Collaborative approach in the development of high-performance brain-computer interfaces for a neuroprosthetic arm: translation from animal models to human control.

Our research group recently demonstrated that a person with tetraplegia could use a brain-computer interface (BCI) to control a sophisticated anthropomorphic robotic arm with skill and speed approaching that of an able-bodied person. This multiyear study exemplifies important principles in translating research from foundational theory and animal experiments into a clinical study. We present a roadmap that may serve as an example for other areas of clinical device research as well as an update on study results. Prior to conducting a multiyear clinical trial, years of animal research preceded BCI testing in an epilepsy monitoring unit, and then in a short-term (28 days) clinical investigation. Scientists and engineers developed the necessary robotic and surgical hardware, software environment, data analysis techniques, and training paradigms. Coordination among researchers, funding institutes, and regulatory bodies ensured that the study would provide valuable scientific information in a safe environment for the study participant. Finally, clinicians from neurosurgery, anesthesiology, physiatry, psychology, and occupational therapy all worked in a multidisciplinary team along with the other researchers to conduct a multiyear BCI clinical study. This teamwork and coordination can be used as a model for others attempting to translate basic science into real-world clinical situations.

Prospective randomized trial of hepatic artery chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin, with or without lipiodol in the treatment of advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This randomized study assessed the responses in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to hepatic arterial doxorubicin plus cisplatin, with or without lipiodol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable and biopsy-proven HCC were treated with doxorubicin (30 mg/m) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m) without (Solution) or with (Lipiodol) emulsification every 2 months till tumor progression. Primary end point was response. RESULTS: Partial response rate was 56.8% for Lipiodol and 47% for Solution, P=0.48. Responses were evaluated as tumor size changes without vascularity assessments, due to the lipiodol. There were no complete responses. Survival at 6,12,18, and 24 months was 65, 32, 27, and 10.8% for Lipiodol patients and 70.6, 26.6, 8.8, and 8.8 for Solution patients. Of the total 71 enrolled and evaluable patients, survival at 6, 12, and 18 months was 75.7, 40, and 35% for responders and 58.8, 17.6, and 0 for nonresponders. There were no clear clinical or biochemical profile differences between the 2 treatment groups or between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Lipiodol conferred a minor response advantage, recorded as tumor size change, to hepatic arterial chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cisplatin for HCC, but no survival advantage.

Explanations and unresolved issues pertaining to the development of the Nuclear Pharmacy Compounding Guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: To provide background information related to the development of the Nuclear Pharmacy Compounding Guidelines, to discuss regulatory complexities related to radiopharmaceutical compounding practice, and to summarize the gaps in the current compounding regulations for radiopharmaceuticals. DATA SOURCES: The Guidelines closely follow the provisions of section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the monographs and chapters related to pharmacy compounding in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), and the recommended guidelines published by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) of 1997 established parameters under which the compounding of drug products is appropriate and lawful, but these criteria expressly do not apply to radiopharmaceuticals. The Nuclear Pharmacy Compounding Practice Committee, a group of nuclear pharmacists convened by the American Pharmaceutical Association, developed the Nuclear Pharmacy Compounding Guidelines to establish a set of principles and guidelines for good radiopharmaceutical compounding practice. The intent of the new document is to provide guidance on radiopharmaceutical compounding practices that have evolved over the last 2 decades and to place them in an appropriate regulatory framework in accordance with previous enforcement policies and guidelines issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the exemption of certain pharmacy practices from enforcement of adulteration, misbranding, and new drug requirements. CONCLUSION: The Nuclear Pharmacy Compounding Guidelines, recently released by APhA, is the first official document that provides realistic and practical compounding guidance for nuclear pharmacists. Even though the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ruled section 503A of the FD&C Act to be invalid in its entirety, and the Supreme Court upheld that ruling, the compliance policy guides issued by FDA in March 1992 and revised in May 2002 maintain guiding principles on pharmacy compounding similar to those stated in section 503A of the FD&C Act. The Nuclear Pharmacy Compounding Practice Committee is optimistic that the practical information contained in the Guidelines will assist state boards of pharmacy, FDA, and the United States Pharmacopeial Convention in setting appropriate standards for nuclear pharmacy compounding practice that will ensure the continued availability of high-quality compounded radiopharmaceuticals at reasonable cost.