Ommaya reservoir use in pediatric ALL and NHL: a review at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

PURPOSE: The intraventricular route of chemotherapy administration, via an Ommaya Reservoir (OmR) improves drug distribution in the central nervous system (CNS) compared to the more commonly used intrathecal administration. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with intraventricular chemotherapy, focused on methotrexate, in patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: Twenty-four patients (aged 7 days - 22.2 years) with 26 OmR placements were identified for a total of 25,009 OmR days between 1990 and 2019. Methotrexate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations (n = 124) were analyzed from 59 courses of OmR therapy in 15 patients. Twenty-one courses involved methotrexate dosing on day 0 only, whereas 38 courses involved booster dosing on days 1, 2, or both. We simulated the time CSF methotrexate concentrations remained > 1 µM for 3 days given various dosing regimens. RESULTS: CSF methotrexate exposure was higher in those who concurrently received systemic methotrexate than via OmR alone (p < 10- 7). Our simulations showed that current intraventricular methotrexate boosting strategy for patients ≥ 3 years of age maintained CSF methotrexate concentrations ≥ 1 µM for 72 h 40% of the time. Alternatively, other boosting strategies were predicted to achieve CSF methotrexate concentrations ≥ 1 µM for 72 h between 46 and 72% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: OmR were able to be safely placed and administer intraventricular methotrexate with and without boost doses in patients from 7 days to 22 years old. Boosting strategies are predicted to increase CSF methotrexate concentrations ≥ 1 µM for 72 h.

Rituximab administration in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-asparaginase (pegaspargase) is a key agent in chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but recipients frequently experience allergic reactions. We hypothesized that by decreasing antibody-producing CD20-positive B cells, rituximab may reduce these reactions. Children and adolescents (aged 1-18 years) with newly diagnosed B-ALL treated on the St. Jude Total XVII study were randomized to induction therapy with or without rituximab on day 3 (cohort 1) or on days 6 and 24 (cohort 2). Patient clinical demographics, CD20 expression, minimal residual disease (MRD), rituximab reactions, pegaspargase allergy, anti-pegaspargase antibodies, and pancreatitis were evaluated. Thirty-five patients received rituximab and 37 did not. Among the 35 recipients, 16 (45.7%) experienced a grade 2 or higher reaction to rituximab. There were no differences between recipients and non-recipients in the incidence of pegaspargase reactions (P > 0.999), anti-pegaspargase antibodies (P = 0.327), or pancreatitis (P = 0.480). CD20 expression on day 8 was significantly lower in rituximab recipients (P < 0.001), but there were no differences in MRD levels on day 8, 15, or at the end of induction. Rituximab administration during induction in pediatric patients with B-ALL was associated with a high incidence of infusion reactions with no significant decrease in pegaspargase allergies, anti-pegaspargase antibodies, or MRD.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of bendamustine in the BEABOVP regimen for the treatment of pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The Stanford V chemotherapy regimen has been used to treat Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients since 2002 with excellent cure rates; however, mechlorethamine is no longer available. Bendamustine, a drug structurally similar to alkylating agents and nitrogen mustard, is being substituted for mechlorethamine in combination therapy in a frontline trial for low- and intermediate-risk pediatric HL patients, forming a new backbone of BEABOVP (bendamustine, etoposide, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, vinblastine, and prednisone). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a 180 mg/m2 dose of bendamustine every 28 days to determine factors that may explain this variability. METHODS: Bendamustine plasma concentrations were measured in 118 samples from 20 pediatric patients with low- and intermediate-risk HL who received a single-day dose of 180 mg/m2 of bendamustine. A pharmacokinetic model was fit to the data using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: Bendamustine concentration vs time demonstrated a trend toward decreasing clearance with increasing age (p = 0.074) and age explained 23% of the inter-individual variability in clearance. The median (range) AUC was 12,415 (8,539, 18,642) µg hr/L and the median (range) maximum concentration was 11,708 (8034, 15,741) µg/L. Bendamustine was well tolerated with no grade 3 toxicities resulting in treatment delays of more than 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: A single-day dose of 180 mg/m2 of bendamustine every 28 days was safe and well tolerated in pediatric patients. While age accounted for 23% of inter-individual variability observed in bendamustine clearance, the differences did not affect the safety and tolerability of bendamustine in our patient population.

Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are safe to administer in patients with antibodies to pegaspargase.

OBJECTIVE: Allergic reactions to pegaspargase during ALL therapy are typically due to antibodies against polyethylene glycol (PEG), which is also used as a stabilizing agent in mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. To evaluate the safety of these vaccines in patients with anti-pegaspargase antibodies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated for ALL who had received SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. All patients had antibodies against pegaspargase assayed during ALL therapy prospectively and in response to clinical allergies. Symptoms of intolerance to vaccination were gathered retrospectively from chart abstraction. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was well tolerated in all 78 patients with prior exposure to pegaspargase as part of their leukemia therapy. No reactions were observed in the 54 patients without a history of anti-pegaspargase antibodies or in 19 patients with antibodies who received mRNA vaccination. 1 patient who received the polysorbate containing Janssen vaccine experienced mild symptoms after vaccination not meeting the criteria of clinical allergy which spontaneously resolved within 25 minutes. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is safe in this population.

Experience using intravenous posaconazole in paediatric and young adult oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity. An IV formulation became available in 2014. Few studies describing the use of this formulation exist in patients under the age of 18 years. This study describes our experience using IV posaconazole in paediatric and young adult cancer patients. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective chart review evaluated patients who received IV posaconazole and had at least one posaconazole plasma concentration obtained after five or more days with a consistent dosage. Relationships between doses required to achieve a plasma concentration of ≥1 µg/mL and patient age, weight and body surface area (BSA) were evaluated. The clinical record was reviewed to identify descriptions of any adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were analysed, with a median age of 10.5 years (range 1.9-22.9 years; 92% were <18 years). All patients were able to achieve a posaconazole plasma concentration ≥1 µg/mL during their treatment course. The daily mg/kg/day dose required to achieve the target concentration decreased significantly with increasing age of the patient (P = 0.018). Assessment of dosage based on BSA suggested a requirement of 225 mg/m2/day across all age groups <18 years. Adverse events documented in the clinical record were consistent with those described with the oral formulations. No CNS toxicities were observed with use of IV posaconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations ≥1 µg/mL are achievable and a BSA-based dosing approach may allow a consistent empirical dose for patients <18 years of age. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to ensure patients achieve therapeutic concentrations.

Higher plasma asparaginase activity after intramuscular than intravenous Erwinia asparaginase.

It is unclear if dosing intervals for Erwinase can be extended with intramuscular (i.m.) versus intravenous (i.v.) dosing. Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia received Erwinase at 30 000-42 000 IU/m2 i.v. or i.m. I.m. Erwinase (n = 22) achieved activity above 0.1 IU/mL for longer than i.v. Erwinase (n = 33) (3.4 vs 2.9 days, P = 0.0007). With 30 000 IU/m2 Monday, Wednesday, Friday, more patients achieved adequate concentrations over the weekend with i.m. vs i.v. dosing (P = 5 × 10-36 ). A schedule with i.v. doses on Monday and Wednesday and i.m. doses on Friday of 30 000 IU/m2 maintained activity > 0.1 IU/mL over the weekend in 80% of patients.

Antibodies Predict Pegaspargase Allergic Reactions and Failure of Rechallenge.

PURPOSE: Pegaspargase (PEG-ASP) has largely replaced native Escherichia coli asparaginase (L-ASP) in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia because of its longer half-life and lower immunogenicity. Risk factors for allergic reactions to PEG-ASP remain unclear. Here, we identify risk factors for reactions in a front-line acute lymphoblastic leukemia trial and assess the usefulness of serum antibodies for diagnosing allergy and predicting rechallenge outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PEG-ASP was administered to 598 patients in St Jude's Total XVI study. Results were compared with Total XV study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00549848 and NCT00137111), which used native L-ASP. Serum samples (n = 5,369) were analyzed for anti-PEG-ASP immunoglobulin G by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Positive samples were tested for anti-polyethylene glycol (PEG) and anti-L-ASP. We analyzed potential risk factors for reactions and associations between antibodies and reactions, rechallenge outcomes, and PEG-ASP pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Grade 2 to 4 reactions were less common in the Total XVI study with PEG-ASP (81 [13.5%] of 598) than in the Total XV study with L-ASP (169 [41.2%] of 410; P = 1.4 × 10-23). For Total XVI, anti-PEG, not anti-L-ASP, was the predominant component of anti-PEG-ASP antibodies (96%). In a multivariable analysis, more intrathecal therapy (IT) predicted fewer reactions (P = 2.4 × 10-5), which is consistent with an immunosuppressant contribution of IT. Anti-PEG-ASP was associated with accelerated drug clearance (P = 5.0 × 10-6). Failure of rechallenge after initial reactions was associated with anti-PEG-ASP (P = .0078) and was predicted by the occurrence of angioedema with first reaction (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Less IT therapy was the only independent clinical risk factor for reactions to PEG-ASP. PEG, and not L-ASP, is the major antigen that causes allergic reactions. Anti-PEG-ASP has utility in predicting and confirming clinical reactions to PEG-ASP as well as in identifying patients who are most likely to experience failure with rechallenge.

Pentamidine for Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Oncology Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive Chemotherapy.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is a life-threatening opportunistic infection in children receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Without prophylaxis, up to 25% of pediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy will develop Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the preferred agent for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Pentamidine may be an acceptable alternative for pediatric patients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. A retrospective review was conducted of pediatric oncology patients who received ≥1 dose of pentamidine for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis between January 2007 and August 2014. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the incidence of breakthrough Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia or discontinuation of pentamidine associated with adverse events. A total of 754 patients received pentamidine prophylaxis during the period. There were no cases of probable or proven Pneumocystis pneumonia, and 4 cases (0.5%) of possible Pneumocystis pneumonia. The incidence of possible breakthrough Pneumocystis pneumonia was not significantly different between subgroups based on age (<12 months [1.7%] versus ≥12 months [0.4%], P = 0.3), route of administration (aerosolized [0%] versus intravenous [1.0%], P = 0.2), or hematopoietic stem cell transplant status (transplant [0.4%] versus no transplant [0.8%], P = 0.6). Pentamidine was discontinued due to an adverse drug event in 23 children (3.1%), more frequently for aerosolized than for intravenous administration (7.6% versus 2.2%, respectively, P = 0.004). Intravenous or inhaled pentamidine may be a safe and effective second-line alternative for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in children with cancer receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Comparable efficacy with varying dosages of glucarpidase in pediatric oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Glucarpidase rapidly reduces methotrexate plasma concentrations in patients experiencing methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction. Debate exists regarding the role of glucarpidase in therapy given its high cost. The use of reduced-dose glucarpidase has been reported, and may allow more institutions to supply this drug to their patients. This report explores the relationship between glucarpidase dosage and patient outcomes in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: The authors evaluated data from 26 patients who received glucarpidase after high-dose methotrexate. Decrease in plasma methotrexate concentrations and time to renal recovery were evaluated for an association with glucarpidase dosage, which ranged from 13 to 90 units/kg. RESULTS: No significant relationship was found between glucarpidase dosage (units/kg) and percent decrease in methotrexate plasma concentrations measured by TDx (P > 0.1) or HPLC (P > 0.5). Patients who received glucarpidase dosages <50 units/kg had a median percent reduction in methotrexate plasma concentration of 99.4% (range, 98-100) measured by HPLC compared to a median percent reduction of 99.4% (range, 77.2-100) in patients who received ≥50 units/kg. Time to SCr recovery was not related to glucarpidase dosage (P > 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of glucarpidase in the treatment of HDMTX-induced kidney injury was not dosage-dependent in this retrospective analysis of pediatric oncology patients.