Surgery for chronic idiopathic constipation: pediatric and adult patients - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a substantial problem in pediatric and adult patients with similar symptoms and workup; however, surgical management of these populations differs. We systematically reviewed the trends and outcomes in the surgical management of CIC in pediatric and adult populations. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1, 1995 and June 26, 2020. Clinical trials and retrospective and prospective studies of patients of any age with a diagnosis of CIC with data of at least 1 outcome of interest were selected. The interventions included surgical resection for constipation or antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedures. The outcome measures included bowel movement frequency, abdominal pain, laxative use, satisfaction, complications, and reinterventions. RESULTS: Adult patients were most likely to undergo resection (94%), whereas pediatric patients were more likely to undergo ACE procedures (96%) as their primary surgery. Both ACE procedures and resections were noted to improve symptoms of CIC; however, ACE procedures were associated with higher complication and reintervention rates. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of CIC in pediatric and adult patients differs with pediatric patients receiving ACE procedures and adults undergoing resections. The evaluation of resections and long-term ACE data in pediatric patients should be performed to inform patients and physicians whether an ACE is an appropriate procedure despite high complication and reintervention rates or whether resections should be considered as an initial approach for CIC.

Intestinal Knockout of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Alpha Affects Structural Adaptation but not Liver Injury Following Massive Enterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Resection-associated liver steatosis, injury, and fibrosis is a devastating complication associated with massive small bowel resection (SBR). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) is a key regulator of intestinal lipid transport and metabolism whose expression is selectively increased after SBR. Here we asked if attenuating intestinal PPARα signaling would prevent steatosis and liver injury after SBR. METHODS: Pparα was deleted selectively in adult mouse intestine using a tamoxifen-inducible Cre-LoxP breeding schema. Mice underwent 50% SBR. At 10 weeks post-operatively, metabolic phenotyping, body composition analysis, in vivo assessment of lipid absorption and intestinal permeability, and assessment of adaptation and liver injury was completed. RESULTS: Pparα intestinal knockout and littermate control mice were phenotypically similar in terms of weight trends and body composition after SBR. All mice demonstrated intestinal adaptation with increased villus height and crypt depth; however, Pparα intestinal knockout mice exhibited decreased villus growth at 10 weeks compared to littermate controls. Liver injury and fibrosis were similar between groups as assessed by serum AST and ALT levels, Sirius Red staining, and hepatic expression of Col1a1 and Acta2. CONCLUSIONS: Inducible intestinal deletion of Pparα influences structural adaptation but does not mitigate liver injury after SBR. These findings suggest that enterocyte PPARα signaling in adult mice is dispensable for resection-induced liver injury. The results are critical for understanding the contribution of intestinal lipid metabolic signaling pathways to the pathogenesis of hepatic injury associated with short bowel syndrome.

Medical student preparation for the operating room.

BACKGROUND: This study examines student perceptions of preparedness for the operating room (OR), resources used, and time spent in preparation. METHODS: Third-year medical and second-year physician assistant students across two campuses at a single academic institution were surveyed to assess perceptions of preparedness, time spent in preparation, resources used, and perceived benefits of preparation. RESULTS: 95 responses (response rate 49%) were received. Students reported being most prepared to discuss operative indications and contraindications (73%), anatomy (86%), and complications (70%), but few felt prepared to discuss operative steps (31%). Students spent a mean of 28 min preparing per case, citing UpToDate and online videos as the most used resources (74%; 73%). On secondary analysis, only the use of an anatomic atlas was weakly correlated with improved preparedness to discuss relevant anatomy (p = 0.005); time spent, number of resources or other specific resources were not associated with increased preparedness. CONCLUSION: Students felt prepared for the OR, though there is room for improvement and a need for student-oriented preparatory materials. Understanding the deficits in preparation, preference for technology-based resources, and time constraints of current students can be used to inform optimisation for medical student education and resources to prepare for operating room cases.