ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during chronic inflammation has been implicated in the progression of liver diseases and carcinogenesis. Subjects with inflammatory liver disease and one non-functional allele of the base excision repair gene, MYH, may be more susceptible to progression to cancer due to MYH haploinsufficiency in repairing oxidative damage caused by ROS. Here, we investigated the association of two common germline MYH mutations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: DNA from patients with HCC (n=48) or cholangiocarcinoma (n=84) compared to non-cancerous controls (n=308) were genotyped for the Y165C and G382D mutations in MYH. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in MYH mutation carrier status between patients with HCC (1/48), cholangiocarcinoma (3/84), and non-cancerous controls (4/308). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCC or cholangiocarcinoma do not have an increased incidence of monoallelic MYH mutations pre-disposing them to disease.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/genetics , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/genetics , Cholangiocarcinoma/genetics , DNA Glycosylases/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA Repair , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: A significant proportion of Lynch syndrome cases are believed to be due to large genomic alterations in the mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2. However, previous studies have not adequately identified the frequency and scope of such mutations, and routine clinical Lynch syndrome testing often does not include analysis for these mutations. Our aim was to characterize hMLH1 and hMSH2 genomic rearrangements in a large population of suspected Lynch syndrome patients. METHODS: A total of 365 samples from probands referred for genetic testing for Lynch syndrome were analyzed for the presence of large genomic alterations in hMLH1 or hMSH2 by using a combination of techniques. Samples with a deletion in exons 1-6 in hMSH2 were further characterized by polymerase chain reaction to establish the presence of the hMSH2 American founder deletion. RESULTS: An hMLH1 or hMSH2 mutation was identified in 153 cases, and, of these, 12 of 67 (17.9%) and 39 of 86 (45.3%) had a large genomic alteration in hMLH1 and hMSH2, respectively. Overall, 6 different hMLH1 and 12 different hMSH2 deletions/duplications, including 10 novel mutations, were identified. Analysis of the hMSH2 exon 1-6 deletion samples showed that 13 of 18 (72.2%) had the American founder deletion. CONCLUSIONS: These data show a high frequency and diverse spectrum of large genomic alterations in hMLH1 and hMSH2 in suspected Lynch syndrome patients. Thus, a comprehensive mutation identification strategy that includes the ability to detect large genomic rearrangements is imperative for the clinical genetic identification of Lynch syndrome patients and families.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Age of Onset , Carrier Proteins , Exons , Female , Gene Dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , MutL Protein Homolog 1 , MutS Homolog 2 Protein , Nuclear Family , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Retrospective Studies , Sequence DeletionABSTRACT
A significant fraction of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer cases with defective mismatch repair (ie, Lynch syndrome) have large genomic deletions or duplications in the mismatch repair genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, which can be challenging to detect by traditional methods. For this study, we developed and validated a novel Southern blot analysis method that allows for ascertainment of the extent of the dosage alterations on an exon-by-exon basis and compared this method to a second novel technique, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). From a total of 254 patients referred for Lynch syndrome testing, 20 of the 118 MLH1 cases and 42 of the 136 MSH2 cases had large genomic alterations, as detected by Southern blot. MLPA and Southern blot results were concordant with the exception of three major discrepancies: one because of a lack of MLPA probes for the region altered, another because of a point mutation near the MLPA probe ligation site, and another that was unexplained. Compared to Southern blot, MLPA has a shorter turn-around time, the analysis is less costly, less time-consuming, and less labor-intensive, and results are generally clear and unambiguous. However, concerns with MLPA include the presence of false-negatives and -positives because of positioning of probes and DNA variants near the probe ligation site. Overall, both Southern blot and MLPA provide important tools for the complete evaluation of patients with Lynch syndrome.
