Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 2024 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235656

ABSTRACT

Esophageal stenosis after ESD has been recorded high for large-scale esophageal lesion. Risk factors for increasing the occurrence of stenosis includes long type lesions, lesions infiltrating into the muscularis mucosa and muscular layer injury. In this case, postoperative stricture of the patient was highly likely occurred. Smectite is a mucosal protective agent that can resist external stimuli, promote wound healing, and reduce inflammatory factors. Therefore, it can effectively prevent the formation of scars on wounds. This study was carried out in humans for the first time and was successful. In conclusion, endoscopic spraying of smectite may be effective and safe in preventing esophageal stenosis after ESD with large non-circumferential lesions.

2.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 76: e2942, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34669873

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the protective effect of calcium dobesilate against contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: A total of 130 patients with diabetes and CKD estimated glomerular filtration rate: 30-90 mL/min/1.73m2 were enrolled and included in the analysis. They were divided into experimental (n=65) and control groups (n=65). Patients in the experimental group were administered oral calcium dobesilate (500 mg) three times daily for 2 days before and 3 days after the procedure. The serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (Cys C), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured before and after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean SCr level at 24h after the procedure was found to be significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (79.1±19.6 µmol/L vs. 87.0±19.3 µmol/L, p=0.023). However, the Cys C and NGAL levels were not significantly different between the two groups at all measurement time points (all p>0.05). The incidence of CIN defined by the SCr level was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (3 [4.6%] vs. 13 [20.0%], p=0.017). However, the incidence of CIN defined by the Cys C level was not statistically different between the two groups (7 [10.8%] vs. 7 [10.8%], p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that calcium dobesilate has no preventive effect against CIN in patients with diabetes and CKD.


Subject(s)
Calcium Dobesilate , Diabetes Mellitus , Kidney Diseases , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Biomarkers , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography , Creatinine , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications
3.
Clinics ; 76: e2942, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1345813

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the protective effect of calcium dobesilate against contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: A total of 130 patients with diabetes and CKD estimated glomerular filtration rate: 30-90 mL/min/1.73m2 were enrolled and included in the analysis. They were divided into experimental (n=65) and control groups (n=65). Patients in the experimental group were administered oral calcium dobesilate (500 mg) three times daily for 2 days before and 3 days after the procedure. The serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (Cys C), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured before and after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean SCr level at 24h after the procedure was found to be significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (79.1±19.6 μmol/L vs. 87.0±19.3 μmol/L, p=0.023). However, the Cys C and NGAL levels were not significantly different between the two groups at all measurement time points (all p>0.05). The incidence of CIN defined by the SCr level was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (3 [4.6%] vs. 13 [20.0%], p=0.017). However, the incidence of CIN defined by the Cys C level was not statistically different between the two groups (7 [10.8%] vs. 7 [10.8%], p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that calcium dobesilate has no preventive effect against CIN in patients with diabetes and CKD.


Subject(s)
Humans , Calcium Dobesilate , Diabetes Mellitus , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Kidney Diseases , Biomarkers , Coronary Angiography , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Creatinine , Glomerular Filtration Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...