Tailored Nurse Support Program Promoting Positive Parenting and Family Preservation.

BACKGROUND: Public health nurse home visiting is a promising approach for addressing the complex needs of families at risk of child maltreatment. The Colorado Nurse Support Program advances service provision by using evidence-based practices to provide tailored assessment and intervention to low-income, primiparous, and multiparous families with children under 18 years of age identified as high risk by county human service systems. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to test the effects of the Nurse Support Program on child protective services case characteristics between Nurse Support Program families and a demographically comparable reference group of families and evaluate changes in parenting outcomes from pre- to postprogram involvement for Nurse Support Program families. METHODS: We used a matched comparison group quasi-experimental design in which families in the Nurse Support Program ( n = 48) were compared to families ( n = 150) who were identified using administrative data from Colorado's Comprehensive Child Welfare Information System. Outcomes were child protective case characteristics (child protection referrals, open assessments, founded assessments, open cases, and children's placement in out-of-home care) and parenting outcomes. RESULTS: Nurse Support Program families were less likely to have a child protection case opened or have their child placed in out-of-home care. There were no significant between-group differences in child protection referrals, open assessments, or founded assessments. Families in the Nurse Support Program showed improvements in parenting outcomes over time. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that the Nurse Support Program is a successful public health nurse home-visiting approach to promote positive parenting and family preservation among families with complex needs. Implementing tailored public health nurse home-visiting programs, such as the Nurse Support Program, should continue to be evaluated and supported to mitigate the public health risk of child maltreatment.

Public Health Nurse Tailored Home Visiting and Parenting Behavior for Families at Risk for Referral to Child Welfare Services, Colorado: 2018-2019.

Objectives. To examine public health nurse (PHN) intervention tailoring through the Colorado Nurse Support Program (NSP). Our 2 specific aims were to describe the NSP program and its outcomes and to determine the effects of modifying interventions on short- and long-term outcomes among NSP clients. Methods. In our retrospective causal investigation of 150 families in Colorado in 2018-2019, intervention effects were modeled via longitudinal modified treatment policy analyses. Results. Families served by PHNs improved in terms of knowledge, behavior, and status outcomes after receiving multidimensional, tailored home visiting interventions. Case management interventions provided in the first month of PHN home visits had lasting effects on behavior outcomes, and 2 additional case management interventions in the first month were estimated to have even more of an impact. Conclusions. Modern causal inference methods and real-world PHN data revealed a nuanced, fine-grained understanding of the real impact of tailored PHN interventions. Public Health Implications PHN programs such as the NSP and use of the Omaha System should be supported and extended to advance evaluations of intervention effectiveness and knowledge discovery and improve population health. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S3):S306-S313. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306792).

Understanding barriers to uptake of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHP) in women with history of preterm birth.

Background: Premature birth is responsible for approximately 38% of infant deaths as well as a host of complications, including abnormal lung development, infection, and long-term disabilities. For women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth in a singleton pregnancy, use of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHP) can reduce the risk of a recurrent preterm birth by up to 42%. However, less than half of eligible women currently receive 17-OHP.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to understand the barriers to access and acceptability of 17-OHP use from the patient perspective.Study design: A qualitative study was conducted of women with a history of a prior spontaneous, singleton preterm birth who were eligible for 17-OHP during a subsequent singleton pregnancy. Researchers recruited 118 eligible women during the Spring and Summer of 2018 from a safety-net hospital in Denver, CO, USA, a hospital that provides healthcare for individuals regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay. Responses from 35 participants were analyzed, looking at themes surrounding knowledge of and counseling received regarding 17-OHP, hesitations, and barriers toward receiving the treatment.Results: Among respondents (34.0% response rate), the mean age was 31.5 years and mean gestational age at delivery was 32.1 weeks. Major themes from interviews included reasons that encouraged women to use 17-OHP, such as the desire to do anything for the health of their baby and reasons that women felt discouraged from using 17-OHP, including unknown complications and lack of information. Other barriers to this treatment method included the time commitment, specifically the length of clinic appointments and concerns about the safety of the 17-OHP injection.Conclusions: One of the strongest reasons for women choosing to use 17-OHP was a desire to do anything possible to support their babies. Somewhat surprisingly, there was not a significant relationship with the participants between gestational age of prior preterm deliveries and subsequent use of 17-OHP. There were two important reasons women cited most frequently for choosing not to use 17-OHP. One was feeling that they lacked information or knowledge about 17-OHP to make an informed decision, which is crucial because the study also showed that all eligible women are not being appropriately counseled on the option of 17-OHP. In terms of time commitment, it was the length of individual appointments, rather than frequency that was a barrier to receiving weekly injections.