Clinical pharmacogenomics: patient perspectives of pharmacogenomic testing and the incidence of actionable test results in a chronic disease cohort.

AIM: This study aimed to examine pharmacogenomic test results and patient perspectives at an academic cardiovascular medicine clinic. PATIENTS & METHODS: Test results for three common cardiovascular drug-gene tests (warfarin-CYP2C9-VKORC1, clopidogrel-CYP2C19 and simvastatin-SLCO1B1) of 208 patients in the Ohio State University-Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative were examined to determine the incidence of potentially actionable test results. A post-hoc, anonymous, patient survey was also conducted. RESULTS: Potentially actionable test results for at least one of the three drug-gene tests were determined in 170 (82%) patients. Survey responses (n = 134) suggested that patients generally considered their test results to be important (median of 7.5 on a 10-point scale of importance) and were interested (median of 7.3 on a 10-point scale of interest) in a Clinical Pharmacogenomic Service. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward pharmacogenomic testing were generally favorable, and potentially actionable test results were not uncommon in this cardiovascular medicine cohort.

Cerebral palsy and seizures in a child with tubulinopathy pattern dysgenesis and focal cortical dysplasia.

A 7-year-old boy with a history of spasticity, global developmental delay, and seizures was given the general diagnosis of cerebral palsy at an early age. Chromosomal array analysis performed at an outside center was normal. The patient's family sought neurodevelopmental pediatric care at a new institution following a move out of state. Electroencephalography confirmed abnormal epileptogenic activity. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed findings consistent with a tubulin gene defect (tubulinopathy) and of focal cortical dysplasia, as well as evidence of a remote occipital lobe injury. This case report describes the various brain magnetic resonance findings suggestive of a tubulin gene defect and raises the possibility of focal cortical dysplasia manifesting as a result of tubulin dysfunction.

CYP2D6 Genetic Variation and Beta-Blocker Maintenance Dose in Patients with Heart Failure.

PURPOSE: This study examined whether a CYP2D6 polymorphism (CYP2D6*4) was related to beta-blocker maintenance dose in patients with heart failure. METHODS: Logistic regression modeling was utilized in a retrospective chart-review analysis of heart-failure patients (60% Male, 90% of European descent) to assess whether CYP2D6*4 (non-functional CYP2D6 allele present in 1 of 5 individuals of European descent) is associated with maintenance dose of carvedilol (n = 65) or metoprolol (n = 33). RESULTS: CYP2D6*4 was associated with lower maintenance dose of metoprolol (OR 0.13 [95% CI 0.02-0.75] p = 0.023), and a trend was observed between CYP2D6*4 and higher maintenance dose of carvedilol (OR 2.94 [95% CI 0.84-10.30] p = 0.093). None of the patients that carried CYP2D6*4 achieved the recommended target dose of metoprolol (200 mg/day). CONCLUSION: Consistent with the role of CYP2D6 in the metabolism of metoprolol, the tolerated maintenance dose of metoprolol was lower in CYP2D6*4 carriers compared to non-carriers. Consistent with the role of CYP2D6 in activation of carvedilol, tolerated maintenance dose of carvedilol was higher in CYP2D6*4 carriers compared to non-carriers. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain the potential of CYP2D6 as a potential predictive biomarker of beta-blocker maintenance dose in heart failure patients.

Identification and referral of families at high risk for cancer susceptibility.

PURPOSE: Obtainment of family history and accurate assessment is essential for the identification of families at risk for hereditary cancer. Our study compared the extent to which the family cancer history in the physician medical record reflected that entered by patients directly into a touch-screen family history computer program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 362 patients seen at a comprehensive cancer center ambulatory clinic over a 1-year period who voluntarily used the computer program and were a mixture of new and return patients. The computer entry was assessed by genetics staff and then compared with the medical record for corroboration of family history information and appropriate physician risk assessment. RESULTS: Family history information from the medical record was available for comparison to the computer entry in 69%. It was most often completed on new patients only and not routinely updated. Of the 362 computer entries, 101 were assigned to a high-risk category. Evidence in the records confirmed 69 high-risk individuals. Documentation of physician risk assessment (ie, notation of significant family cancer history or hereditary risk) was found in only 14 of the high-risk charts. Only seven high-risk individuals (6.9%) had evidence of referral for genetic consultation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the need to collect family history information on all new and established patients in order to perform adequate cancer risk assessment. The lack of identification of patients at highest risk seems to be directly correlated with insufficient data collection, risk assessment, and documentation by medical staff.