Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Psychopharmacol ; 29(8): 933-42, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26040903

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a clinically acceptable method of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for olanzapine and risperidone and to evaluate the feasibility of its implementation. METHOD: A non-randomised study of inpatients from five Mental Health Trusts was conducted, with a clinical interview at the time of TDM and a subsequent 6-week follow-up review of clinical notes. The TDM intervention comprised: (a) a venous blood sample taken 12 hours post-dose, 7-10 days after drug initiation, and (b) rapid results feedback, with interpretation algorithm guidance. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants provided samples (19 prescribed olanzapine, 13 risperidone). Twenty-six participants remained on the target drug at study end, with seven experiencing a dose change, for whom only four of the TDM results were confirmed as having been checked. Mean dose increased for olanzapine (0.9 mg/day, range 0-10) and decreased for risperidone (-0.3 mg/day, range -4-3). CONCLUSION: TDM can be implemented as part of routine clinical practice for both drugs. However, the lack of robust supporting evidence for or against antipsychotic TDM has probably led to a lack of enthusiasm for and interest in the results. Nevertheless, the advent of less invasive measures and the targeting of patients who might be more likely to benefit may facilitate uptake.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Benzodiazepines/blood , Drug Monitoring/methods , Risperidone/blood , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Olanzapine , Risperidone/administration & dosage , Young Adult
2.
J Psychopharmacol ; 29(2): 212-23, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25049261

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepine prescribing for schizophrenia occurs in clinical practice and antipsychotic trials. This review examined the clinical outcomes for benzodiazepines in schizophrenia. METHOD: A systematic search identified randomised controlled trials that evaluated benzodiazepines in comparison with placebo or antipsychotics, and also as adjuncts to antipsychotics. Relevant clinical outcome data was extracted. RESULTS: Twenty six studies were included with some reporting multiple comparisons. Seven short-term studies compared benzodiazepines with placebo: benzodiazepine superiority was found in two out of five studies for global improvements and two out of four studies for psychiatric/behavioural outcomes. Eleven studies compared benzodiazepines with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs): four out of nine studies (including two long-term studies) reported greater global improvements for antipsychotics; four out of five studies showed no treatment differences for psychiatric/behavioural outcomes. Fourteen studies compared benzodiazepines (as adjunct to antipsychotics) vs antipsychotics alone (mostly FGAs); benzodiazepine superiority was found for global improvement in one out of eight studies and inferiority in two out of eight short-term studies whereas superiority was found for psychiatric/behavioural outcomes in three out of 12 short-term studies and inferiority in three out of 12 studies. CONCLUSION: Benzodiazepine superiority over placebo was found for global, psychiatric and behavioural outcomes, but inferiority to antipsychotics on longer-term global outcomes. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the addition of benzodiazepines to antipsychotics; thus the use of benzodiazepines in clinical practice and antipsychotic trials should be limited.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/urine , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...