Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 34(6): 419-22, 1996 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8879929

ABSTRACT

Among 1619 patients suspected of occupational contact dermatitis examined during the years 1990-1994, sensitivity to acrylates was diagnosed in 9 persons (4 dental technicians, 4 dentists, 1 textile printer). Ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (5 positive patch tests), methyl methacrylate (4), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (4) and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (4) were the most common sensitizers. Comparison of patch test results in dental technicians and dentists indicated that dentists were sensitive to a greater number of (meth)acrylate (acrylate and methacrylate) allergens and also to certain other allergens (metals and rubber additives). Dental technicians were sensitive almost exclusively to methacrylates, while the textile printer only to acrylates.


Subject(s)
Acrylates/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Composite Resins/adverse effects , Cross-Linking Reagents/adverse effects , Dental Alloys/adverse effects , Dental Materials/adverse effects , Dental Technicians , Dentists , Female , Humans , Male , Methacrylates/adverse effects , Methylmethacrylate , Methylmethacrylates/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure , Patch Tests , Poland/epidemiology , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Polymethacrylic Acids/adverse effects , Rubber/adverse effects , Textile Industry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...