Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Geology ; 20: 99-103, 1992 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11537752

ABSTRACT

The hypothesis of Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary impact on Yucatán, Mexico, predicts that nearby sites should show evidence of proximal impact ejecta and disturbance by giant waves. An outcrop along the Arroyo el Mimbral in northeastern Mexico contains a layered clastic unit up to 3 m thick that interrupts a biostratigraphically complete pelagic-marl sequence deposited at more than 400 m water depth. The marls were found to be unsuitable for determining magnetostratigraphy, but foraminiferal biostratigraphy places the clastic unit precisely at the K-T boundary. We interpret this clastic unit as the deposit of a megawave or tsunami produced by an extraterrestrial impact. The clastic unit comprises three main subunits. (1) The basal "spherule bed" contains glass in the form of tektites and microtektites, glass spherules replaced by chlorite-smectite and calcite, and quartz grains showing probable shock features. This bed is interpreted as a channelized deposit of proximal ejecta. (2) A set of lenticular, massive, graded "laminated beds" contains intraclasts and abundant plant debris, and may be the result of megawave backwash that carried coarse debris from shallow parts of the continental margin into deeper water. (3) At the top, several thin "ripple beds" composed of fine sand are separated by clay drapes; they are interpreted as deposits of oscillating currents, perhaps a seiche. An iridium anomaly (921 +/- 23 pg/g) is observed at the top of the ripple beds. Our observations at the Mimbral locality support the hypothesis of a K-T impact on nearby Yucatán.


Subject(s)
Geology , Glass/analysis , Minor Planets , Animals , Eukaryota , Fossils , Geological Phenomena , Iridium , Mexico , Minerals , Oceans and Seas , Plankton , Plants , Solar System
2.
Trends Ecol Evol ; 3(10): 274-7, 1988 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21227245

ABSTRACT

In alleging that Archaeopteryx is a fake, Hoyle and others marvel at how such a fossil could be the result of natural processes. But the peculiarities of Archaeopteryx's preservation, which they cite as evidence that the feathers cannot be genuine, are features shared with the many other fossils from the Solnhofen limestone.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...