Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Matern Child Nutr ; 15 Suppl 4: e12781, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31225708

ABSTRACT

Promotion of breast milk substitutes (BMS) and inappropriate marketing of commercially produced complementary foods (CPCF), including through television, can negatively influence infant and young child feeding. The World Health Organization International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and subsequent relevant World Health Assembly (WHA) resolutions prohibit such advertising and require manufacturers and distributors to comply with its provisions; however, such regulations at national level may vary. Advertisements require Ministry of Health approval in Cambodia but are not regulated in Senegal. Television stations were monitored for 13 months in Phnom Penh and for 3 months in Dakar to assess advertisements for BMS and CPCF. Ten television channels (out of 16) in Phnom Penh and four (out of 20) in Dakar aired advertisements for BMS. Three and five channels, respectively, aired advertisements for CPCF. All BMS advertised in Phnom Penh were for children over 1 year of age. BMS products for children 6+ months of age and 1+ years of age were advertised in Dakar. Average air time for BMS advertisements was 189.5 min per month in Phnom Penh and 29.7 min in Dakar. Air time for CPCF advertisements averaged 3.2 min per month and 13.6 min, respectively. Fewer than half of BMS advertisements and three quarters of CPCF advertisements explicitly stated an age of use for products. Nutrition and health claims were common across BMS advertisements. This study illustrates the need to adopt, regulate, monitor, and enforce legislation prohibiting BMS promotion, as well as to implement regulations to prevent inappropriate promotion of CPCF.


Subject(s)
Advertising/statistics & numerical data , Milk Substitutes/economics , Milk Substitutes/legislation & jurisprudence , Television/statistics & numerical data , Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Cambodia , Fast Foods/economics , Food Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant , International Law , Milk, Human , Nutrition Policy/economics , Nutrition Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Prevalence , Senegal , Television/legislation & jurisprudence , World Health Organization
2.
Matern Child Nutr ; 12 Suppl 2: 64-76, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27061957

ABSTRACT

This study assessed the promotion of commercially produced foods and consumption of these products by children less than 24 months of age in Dakar Department, Senegal. Interviews with 293 mothers of children attending child health clinics assessed maternal exposure to promotion and maternal recall of foods consumed by the child on the preceding day. Promotion of breastmilk substitutes and commercially produced complementary foods outside health facilities was common with 41.0% and 37.2% of mothers, respectively, reporting product promotions since the birth of their youngest child. Promotion of commercially produced snack food products was more prevalent, observed by 93.5% of mothers. While all mothers reported having breastfed their child, only 20.8% of mothers breastfed their newborn within the first hour after delivery, and 44.7% fed pre-lacteal feeds in the first 3 days after delivery. Of children 6-23 months of age, 20.2% had consumed a breastmilk substitute; 49.1% ate a commercially produced complementary food, and 58.7% ate a commercially produced snack food product on the previous day. There is a need to stop the promotion of breastmilk substitutes, including infant formula, follow-up formula, and growing-up milks. More stringent regulations and enforcement could help to eliminate such promotion to the public through the media and in stores. Promotion of commercial snack foods is concerning, given the high rates of consumption of such foods by children under the age of 2 years. Efforts are needed to determine how best to reduce such promotion and encourage replacement of these products with more nutritious foods.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Diet/adverse effects , Infant Food , Infant Formula , Nutrition Policy , Patient Compliance , Breast Feeding/ethnology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Developing Countries , Diet/ethnology , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Fast Foods/economics , Female , Food Labeling , Humans , Infant , Infant Food/economics , Infant Formula/economics , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mothers , Nutrition Surveys , Patient Compliance/ethnology , Senegal , Snacks/ethnology , Urban Health/ethnology
3.
Matern Child Nutr ; 12 Suppl 2: 106-25, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27061960

ABSTRACT

National legislation and global guidance address labelling of complementary foods to ensure that labels support optimal infant and young child feeding practices. This cross-sectional study assessed the labels of commercially produced complementary foods (CPCF) sold in Phnom Penh (n = 70), Cambodia; Kathmandu Valley (n = 22), Nepal; Dakar Department (n = 84), Senegal; and Dar es Salaam (n = 26), Tanzania. Between 3.6% and 30% of products did not provide any age recommendation and 8.6-20.2% of products, from all sites, recommended an age of introduction of <6 months. Few CPCF products provided a daily ration (0.0-8.6%) and 14.5-55.6% of those that did exceeded the daily energy recommendation for complementary foods for a breastfed child from 6 to 8.9 months of age. Only 3.6-27.3% of labels provided accurate and complete messages in the required language encouraging exclusive breastfeeding, and almost none (0.0-2.9%) provided accurate and complete messages regarding the appropriate introduction of complementary foods together with continued breastfeeding. Between 34.3% and 70.2% of CPCF manufacturers also produced breastmilk substitutes and 41.7-78.0% of relevant CPCF products cross-promoted their breastmilk substitutes products. Labelling practices of CPCF included in this study do not fully comply with international guidance on their promotion and selected aspects of national legislation, and there is a need for more detailed normative guidance on certain promotion practices in order to protect and promote optimal infant and young child feeding.


Subject(s)
Beverages , Food Labeling , Food-Processing Industry , Guideline Adherence , Infant Food , Beverages/economics , Cambodia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Developing Countries , Diet Surveys , Food Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Labeling/standards , Food-Processing Industry/economics , Humans , Infant , Infant Food/economics , Nepal , Recommended Dietary Allowances , Senegal , Tanzania , Urban Health
4.
Matern Child Nutr ; 12 Suppl 2: 126-39, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27061961

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: In order to assess the prevalence of point-of-sale promotions of infant and young child feeding products in Phnom Penh, Cambodia; Kathmandu Valley, Nepal; Dakar Department, Senegal; and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, approximately 30 retail stores per site, 121 in total, were visited. Promotional activity for breastmilk substitutes (BMS) and commercially produced complementary foods in each site were recorded. Point-of-sale promotion of BMS occurred in approximately one-third of sampled stores in Phnom Penh and Dakar Department but in 3.2% and 6.7% of stores in Kathmandu Valley and Dar es Salaam, respectively. Promotion of commercially produced complementary foods was highly prevalent in Dakar Department with half of stores having at least one promotion, while promotions for these products occurred in 10% or less of stores in the other three sites. While promotion of BMS in stores is legal in Senegal, it is prohibited in Cambodia without prior permission of the Ministry of Health/Ministry of Information and prohibited in both Nepal and Tanzania. Strengthening legislation in Senegal and enforcing regulations in Cambodia could help to prevent such promotion that can negatively affect breastfeeding practices. KEY MESSAGES: Even in countries such as Cambodia, Nepal and Tanzania where point-of-sale promotion is restricted, promotions of BMS were observed (in nearly one-third of stores in Phnom Penh and less than 10% in Dar es Salaam and Kathmandu). Limited promotion of commercially produced complementary foods was evident (less than 10% of stores had a promotion for such foods), except in Dakar Department, where promotions were found in half of stores. Efforts are needed to strengthen monitoring, regulation and enforcement of restrictions on the promotion of BMS. Manufacturers and distributors should take responsibility for compliance with national regulations and global policies pertaining to the promotion of breastmilk substitutes.


Subject(s)
Beverages , Food Labeling , Infant Food , Infant Formula , Milk Substitutes , Beverages/economics , Cambodia , Developing Countries , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Fast Foods/economics , Food, Fortified/economics , Humans , Infant , Infant Food/economics , Infant Formula/economics , Milk Substitutes/economics , Nepal , Senegal , Snacks , Tanzania , Urban Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...