Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 60: 21-24, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27864157

ABSTRACT

A tilapia farm experiencing endemic streptococcosis was selected to study the effect of vaccination with a feed-based vaccine on naturally ocurring streptococcosis. A total of 9000 red tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus × Oreochromis mossambicus of 100 ± 20 g were divided into 9 cages. Fish of Group 1 in cages 1, 2 and 3 were not vaccinated. Group 2 in cages 4, 5 and 6 were vaccinated on days 0 and 14 (single booster) while Group 3 in cages 7, 8 and 9 were vaccinated on days 0, 14 and 42 (double booster). Vaccination was done by oral administration of the feed-based bacterin vaccine at 4% bodyweight. Samples of serum for antibody study and the brain, eyes and kidney for bacterial isolation were collected at 14-day intervals. The study was carried out during the critical months between April and June. Following vaccination and booster, there was significant (p < 0.05) increase in the antibody levels in all vaccinated groups from week 1 that reached the peak at week 3 before declining gradually until week 6. However, second booster on week 6 significantly (p < 0.05) increased the antibody level that remained high until the end of the 16-week study period (double booster). Streptococcus agalactiae was isolated at the start of the experiment (day 0) at an average of 10 ± 5.0% of the sampled fish. In week 4, the isolation rate was 13 ± 5.7% but increased to 18 ± 7.6% in week 8, to 25 ± 10.0% in week 10, to 28 ± 5.8% in week 12 and 25 ± 7.3% in week 14. The average isolation rate was 28 ± 7.2%, 18 ± 7.1% and 13 ± 8.2% of the fish sampled from unvaccinated, single booster and double booster groups, respectively. At the end of the study period, the survival rate was 45.2 ± 2.45% for unvaccinated, 65.3 ± 4.8% for single booster and 75.1 ± 2.1% for double booster groups. Vaccinating fish in endemic farm might not eliminate the disease but was able to significantly improve the survival rate.


Subject(s)
Cichlids , Fish Diseases/prevention & control , Fisheries , Streptococcal Infections/veterinary , Streptococcal Vaccines/immunology , Streptococcus agalactiae/immunology , Animal Feed , Animals , Fish Diseases/microbiology , Hybridization, Genetic , Streptococcal Infections/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Tilapia , Vaccination/veterinary
2.
BMC Vet Res ; 12(1): 194, 2016 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27608936

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Streptococcosis is an important disease of tilapia throughout the world. In Malaysia, streptococcosis outbreak was commonly reported during the 3-month period of high water temperature between April and July. This study describes the duration of protection following single and double booster dose regimes against streptococcosis in tilapia using a feed-based vaccine containing formalin-killed Streptococcus agalactiae. A total of 510 tilapias of 120 ± 10 g were selected and divided into 3 groups. Fish of Group 1 were vaccinated at weeks 0 and 2 (single booster group) while fish of Group 2 were vaccinated at weeks 0, 2 and 6 (double booster group) with a feed-based vaccine against streptococcosis. Fish of Group 3 was not vaccinated. Serum samples were collected weekly to determine the antibody level while samples of eye, brain and kidney were collected for bacterial isolation. At week 10, all fish were challenged with live S. agalactiae and the survival rate was determined. RESULTS: Both vaccinated groups showed significant (p < 0.05) increase in the antibody levels following the first booster dose, which lasted until week 6. Group 2 showed consistent high level of antibody following the second booster dose at week 6 and remained high until week 12. Challenge trial at week 10 resulted in 45 %, 70 % and 0 % rate of survival for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Double booster regime is most suitable to be applied for feed-based vaccination against streptococcosis prior to the start of the hot season.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Fish Diseases/prevention & control , Streptococcal Infections/veterinary , Streptococcal Vaccines/immunology , Tilapia/genetics , Vaccination/veterinary , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolation & purification , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...