Pattern of osteolysis around two different cementless metal-backed cups: retrospective, radiographic analysis at minimum 10-year follow-up.

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the formation of osteolysis with 2 cementless cups to evaluate if surface holes in metal shells influence the radiographic pattern of osteolysis. At a minimum of 10 years' follow-up, serial radiographs of 112 hips with Arthropor cups (having multiple shell holes) and 126 hips with Anatomic Medullary Locking (AML) cups (with no holes) were reviewed. Despite differences in variables other than cup design that can affect polyethylene wear and osteolysis rates, the incidence of osteolysis between the groups was coincidentally similar (47.3%, Arthropor; 47.6%, AML). The time of onset of osteolysis (mean, 7.5 and 7.4 years) also was similar. The radiographic pattern of the osteolytic lesions, which is largely a factor of cup design, differed. The Arthropor group had significantly larger lesions in Charnley zone I and significantly more hips with retroacetabular lesions (Charnley zones I and II); however, these lesions did not compromise cup stability. Patients with AML cups had more and larger lesions in the greater trochanter.

A clinically practical method of manually assessing polyethylene liner thickness.

BACKGROUND: Most orthopaedists do not have access to contemporary computer-assisted radiographic techniques and therefore must use manual radiographic methods to assess polyethylene wear. The accuracy of most manual methods, however, has not been verified on clinical radiographs. In this study, we used manufacturer-developed wear templates to measure polyethylene wear and compared that technique with two other commonly used manual radiographic methods. Our purpose was to compare the accuracy of these techniques and thus determine their usefulness in assessing polyethylene wear in individual patients. METHODS: We analyzed seventeen polyethylene liners that were retrieved during revision operations after a mean of 12.0 years in situ. With use of digital calipers, we directly measured the true minimum polyethylene thickness of the explanted liner. We then measured the polyethylene thickness on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs that had been made before the revision. Three different manual techniques were used to evaluate the radiographs: the Dorr method, the Livermore method, and the newly described wear-template method. The minimum polyethylene thickness that was calculated with use of each of these methods was compared with the thickness as determined by direct measurement of the explanted liner. RESULTS: The mean error for the Dorr method (1.54 +/- 1.21 mm) was significantly greater than that for both the Livermore method (0.07 +/- 0.62 mm) and the wear-template method (-0.04 +/- 0.28 mm) (p < 0.01). The mean error for the Dorr method was significantly greater than zero (p < 0.01), indicating that this method consistently overestimated the true measurement. In contrast, the mean errors for the Livermore and wear-template methods were not significantly different from zero (p = 0.64 and 0.58, respectively), indicating that these methods did not consistently underestimate or overestimate the true measurement. However, the large standard deviations for all three methods suggest that the ranges in error are wide. The limits of agreement for the Livermore technique ranged from a 1.17-mm underestimation to a 1.31-mm overestimation of the true thickness of the polyethylene; those of the wear-template technique were smaller, ranging from a 0.60-mm underestimation to a 0.52-mm overestimation. CONCLUSION: The practicing orthopaedist needs an accurate and efficient method for determining the polyethylene thickness of modular acetabular components. We found that the template method best met this requirement because it involved a simple procedure: placing the template over the radiograph and measuring the distance between the femoral head and the inner surface of the metal shell. The other methods were less accurate, required additional information from the manufacturer, were more time-consuming, and were not as easy to demonstrate to the patient.

Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty.

The current study examined the relationships among femoral stiffness, implant stiffness, and bone remodeling in 40 femurs retrieved at autopsy from 20 patients with unilateral uncemented hip replacements. The purpose of the study was to determine if the magnitude of periprosthetic bone loss after arthroplasty was correlated with, and could be predicted from, stem and femoral stiffness terms. For analysis, the contralateral normal femur was used as a control to represent the unremodeled condition of the in vivo implanted femur. Bone loss attributable to remodeling was quantified by video-densitometric analysis. Stiffness terms were calculated as the product of the elastic modulus and geometric properties digitized from cross-sectional slab radiographs. Femoral stiffness calculations accounted for variations in modulus attributable to patient differences in bone mineral density and geometric properties attributable to differences in the shape of individual femurs. Similarly, calculations of implant stiffness accounted for variations in implant shape. Results showed axial bone stiffness was the variable most strongly correlated with bone loss. Individual stem stiffness terms were not significantly correlated with bone loss. Multiple linear regression analysis, using stem-to-bone stiffness ratios as independent variables, accounted for 46% of the variance in bone loss data. In the regression analysis, the axial stem-to-bone stiffness ratio was the strongest correlate with bone loss. Although these results show the influence of mechanical stiffness factors on bone remodeling, other factors (hormonal status, drugs, disease, activity level) could represent the variance in bone loss data not accounted for in the study.

Effect of radiographic quality on computer-assisted head penetration measurements.

Even the most sophisticated computer-assisted radiographic techniques of measuring femoral head penetration into the polyethylene liner depend on the quality of the radiograph being evaluated, which varies greatly in clinical settings. The authors of this study sought to determine how the accuracy and reproducibility of three commercially available computer-assisted measurement systems differed when measuring optimal radiographs (with sharply defined component edges) and suboptimal radiographs (with less well defined edges). Using three computer-assisted measurement systems, the authors measured head penetration on simulated and clinical hip radiographs. All systems calculated head penetration as the movement of the head center relative to the cup center. To define the periphery of the prosthetic head and cup, one method (System One) used the human eye and a digitizing tablet, whereas the other two methods (System Two and System Three) used digital edge detection algorithms. For simulated hip radiographs, error was calculated as the absolute value of the difference between the known amount of head penetration, determined by a coordinate measuring machine, and the amount of penetration determined by the software. Three way analysis of variance showed a significant difference in absolute error among the three measurement techniques. System One had a significantly smaller absolute error (0.11 +/- 0.06 mm) than did System Two (0.25 +/- 0.25 mm) and System Three (0.19 +/- 0.13 mm). In addition, three-way analysis of variance showed that optimal radiographs were associated with a significantly lower absolute error (0.14 +/- 0.09 mm) than were suboptimal radiographs (0.23 +/- 0.22 mm). For optimal radiographs, there was no significant difference in error among the three measurement methods; all systems were accurate and reproducible. However, for suboptimal radiographs absolute error increased and varied widely, and a significant difference among the methods existed. These data show the susceptibility of head penetration measurements to radiographic technique and underscore the importance of good quality radiographs for all analyses of head penetration.

The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. A postmortem analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although periprosthetic bone loss remains a major concern in total hip arthroplasty, radiographic assessment of such loss is both difficult and subjective. In the present study, we assessed the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to reproducibly recognize changes in periprosthetic bone density on radiographs. We hypothesized that assessment of periprosthetic bone loss on plain radiographs is not reliable enough to justify its use in outcomes research. METHODS: Twenty-nine unilateral total hip replacements and the surrounding bone were retrieved at autopsy, and radiographs were made; radiographs of the contralateral, normal femur were also made after implantation of an identical prosthesis and used as a control. Three orthopaedic surgeons independently examined the specimen radiographs and classified bone loss in each of sixteen femoral zones. Bone loss was recorded as present if the bone of the femur that had had in vivo implantation showed evidence of cortical thinning, increased porosity, or decreased density (either cortical or trabecular) when compared with the control femur. The kappa coefficient was used to quantify interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in determining bone loss for the 464 zones examined and in determining the Engh and Bobyn stress-shielding classification of each femur. In fourteen femoral pairs, bone loss was also quantified with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and the resulting value was then compared with the bone-loss classification that had been determined radiographically. RESULTS: First, the surgeons agreed on the presence or absence of bone loss in 73 percent (337) of the 464 zones. The interobserver kappa value of 0.58 denoted only good reproducibility. The intraobserver reproducibility was better; the surgeon's initial evaluation of bone loss agreed with his second evaluation for 90 percent of the zones (kappa = 0.74). Second, the three surgeons agreed on the degree of stress-shielding, according to the Engh and Bobyn classification, in 66 percent (nineteen) of the twenty-nine femora. The kappa value for this comparison was only 0.27, indicating marginal reproducibility. Third, although there was some agreement among reviewers when there was 20 to 60 percent reduction in bone-mineral content as determined with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, excellent agreement among the examiners (kappa = 0.85) was not achieved until bone loss averaged 70 percent. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results, we suggest caution in interpreting results from studies of femoral bone loss that have used plain radiographic analysis if the authors have not provided interobserver reliability data. We question the utility of evaluating periprosthetic bone loss on radiographs, since the loss is not reproducibly recognized until 70 percent of the bone is gone.

Comparison of in vivo wear between polyethylene liners articulating with ceramic and cobalt-chrome femoral heads.

At yearly intervals we compared the radiological wear characteristics of 81 alumina ceramic femoral heads with a well-matched group of 43 cobalt-chrome femoral heads. Using a computer-assisted measurement system we assessed two-dimensional penetration of the head into the polyethylene liner. We used linear regression analysis of temporal data of the penetration of the head to calculate the true rates of polyethylene wear for both groups. At a mean of seven years the true rate of wear of the ceramic group was slightly greater (0.09 mm/year, SD 0.07) than that of the cobalt-chrome group (0.07 mm/year, SD 0.04). Despite the numerous theoretical advantages of ceramic over cobalt-chrome femoral heads, the wear performance in vivo of these components was similar.

Characterization of long-term femoral-head-penetration rates. Association with and prediction of osteolysis.

BACKGROUND: We examined the relationship between long-term femoral-head-penetration patterns and osteolysis in a ten-year follow-up study of a well controlled patient population. The purposes of this study were to characterize the linearity of long-term head-penetration patterns over time, to describe the relationship between ten-year true wear rates and osteolysis, and to determine whether the occurrence of osteolysis at ten years could be predicted by penetration data obtained prior to five years. METHODS: Temporal femoral-head-penetration patterns were examined at a minimum of ten years after forty-eight primary total hip arthroplasties. The arthroplasties were performed with the use of an Arthropor acetabular cup (Joint Medical Products) and a thirty-two-millimeter-diameter cobalt-chromium femoral head (DePuy). Using a computer-assisted radiographic technique, we evaluated two-dimensional head penetration on serial annual radiographs. Linear regression analysis modeled penetration-versus-time data as a line for each patient. The slope of the regression line indicated the true wear rate for each patient. In a subgroup of thirty-four hips for which three annual radiographs had been made less than five years after the arthroplasty, we compared early head-penetration patterns with the later occurrence of osteolysis. RESULTS: For all forty-eight hips, the true wear rate averaged 0.18 millimeter per year (range, 0.01 to 0.44 millimeter per year) and temporal head-penetration patterns tended to be linear (mean r2 = 0.91 +/- 0.16). Osteolysis at ten years was strongly associated with increasing true wear rates (p < 0.001). Osteolysis did not develop in any of the nine hips with a true wear rate of less than 0.1 millimeter per year. However, osteolysis developed in nine (43 percent) of twenty-one hips with a rate between 0.1 and less than 0.2 millimeter per year, in eight of ten hips with a rate between 0.2 and 0.3 millimeter per year, and in all eight hips with a rate of greater than 0.3 millimeter per year. Evaluation of early true wear rates as a predictor of late osteolysis showed a similar relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that true wear rates tend to be constant and that increased true wear is significantly associated with osteolysis at ten years after the operation. A similar relationship was also found at the early follow-up interval, indicating that early true wear rates (determined from serial radiographs) might enable orthopaedists to predict if patients are at risk for the development of osteolysis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: On the basis of these findings, we use temporal femoral-head-penetration data in our practice to evaluate polyethylene inserts in asymptomatic patients, to estimate the time to component wear-through, and to adjust the frequency of follow-up evaluations for monitoring the development of osteolytic lesions in at-risk patients.

Migration of polyethylene wear debris in one type of uncemented femoral component with circumferential porous coating: an autopsy study of 5 femurs.

This autopsy study analyzed the migration of polyethylene wear debris adjacent to uncemented femoral components with circumferential porous coating. Five femoral specimens retrieved at autopsy from 3 patients were investigated. Two stems were 40% porous coated, 2 were 80% porous coated, and 1 was 100% porous coated. The implants' time in situ ranged from 53 to 132 months (average, 94.8 months). All patients were followed clinically and radiographically until death. Radiographically, 3 of the stems were bone ingrown with proximal bone loss, 1 stem was mainly fibrous encapsulated, and 1 stem was completely fibrous encapsulated. Histologic examination of bone adjacent to the middle and distal sections of the femoral implant revealed no polyethylene wear debris or granulation tissue in any of the specimens. In 2 bone-ingrown cases, a small number of polyethylene particles and small areas of granulation tissue were present at the proximal level. This granulation tissue, however, did not cause major osteolysis. The findings in this study imply that circumferential porous coating of cementless femoral components could prevent distal migration of polyethylene wear debris along the bone-implant interface in both bone-ingrown and fibrous-encapsulated femoral implants.

The effect of weight-bearing on the radiographic measurement of the position of the femoral head after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In most radiographic studies of polyethylene wear, investigators have used routine annual radiographs made with the patient in the supine position in order to measure penetration by the femoral head into the polyethylene liner. However, researchers have begun to question the effect of weight-bearing on the position of the head within the acetabular cup and, consequently, the effect of weight-bearing on measurements of penetration by the head. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effect of weight-bearing on the two-dimensional radiographic position of the femoral head within the acetabular cup. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (forty-seven hips) who had had a total hip arthroplasty had radiographs made at one of two separate institutions. A set of anteroposterior radiographs was made for each patient: one radiograph was made with the patient supine and one was made with the patient upright bearing full weight on the replaced hip. At one of the institutions, a third anteroposterior radiograph was made with the patient in the same upright position but not bearing weight on the replaced hip. All measurements of the two-dimensional position of the head were performed by a single observer with use of a previously published computerized measurement system. RESULTS: Data from both institutions revealed that measurements of the position of the head on radiographs made with the patient supine were strongly and significantly correlated with measurements of the position of the head on radiographs made with the patient bearing weight (r2>0.93, p<0.001 for both regressions). Examination of the differences between the measurements revealed no bias for one set of measurements to consistently underestimate or overestimate the values derived with use of the other method. Moreover, we found a nearly perfect relationship between the measurements of the position of the head on radiographs made with the patient standing and bearing weight and those on radiographs made with the patient standing but not bearing weight (r2 = 0.97, p<0.001, slope = 0.99, intercept = 0.02 millimeter). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these findings, there is no evidence that radiographs must be made with the patient bearing weight in order to accurately measure the position of the femoral head within the polyethylene liner.

Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling. A postmortem analysis.

This study used femurs retrieved at autopsy to compare the extent and location of bone remodeling between four patients implanted with proximally porous coated femoral prostheses and a matched group of four patients implanted with extensively porous coated femoral prostheses. The femoral components studied were large, cementless, straight, cobalt chrome stems and were identical except for the amount of porous coating. The contralateral normal femur of each patient also was retrieved, implanted with an identical prosthesis, and used as a control for bone mineral content. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometric analysis showed marked loss of bone mineral content in both groups of patients. The extensively coated group had less bone loss on average (18.4%) than did the proximally coated group (38.6%). There was no relationship between the extent of coating and the location of bone mineral loss; specifically, proximal coating did not protect against loss of bone mineral content proximally or distally in the femur. Videodensitometric analysis of cross sections of periprosthetic bone also showed that the extensively coated group tended to have less decrease in bone density than did the proximally coated group (14.3% versus 28.4%). Although one cannot presume that all proximally fixed stem designs would produce results similar to those presented here, these findings show that decreasing the extent of porous coating alone does not necessarily reduce proximal femoral bone loss.

Factors affecting femoral bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

We performed a postmortem comparison of femurs from two patients who had bilateral cementless total hip arthroplasties with femoral prostheses of different stiffness implanted in their right and left hips. Radiographs of transverse sections of the four femurs demonstrated that all the prostheses were bone ingrown with the most ingrowth occurring distally where the porous coating contacted diaphyseal bone. In both patients, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis revealed that the femur implanted with the stiffer prosthesis had a 65% to 79% greater loss of proximal periprosthetic bone than the femur implanted with the more flexible prosthesis. One patient, however, had a dramatically greater total loss of bone from side to side than the other patient. In this patient, we believe that it was host factors more than the differences in stem stiffness that affected the bone-remodeling pattern. Although the two femurs with the stiffer prostheses had the greatest bone loss, the two femurs with the more flexible prostheses demonstrated radiographic signs of cantilever bending of the prosthetic stem and failure of proximal osseointegration. We are not aware of any other bilateral human postmortem analysis that so clearly illustrates the effect of stem stiffness on bone remodeling.

Analysis of temporal wear patterns of porous-coated acetabular components: distinguishing between true wear and so-called bedding-in.

BACKGROUND: Standard radiographic assessment of penetration by the femoral head into a polyethylene liner does not enable clinicians to distinguish between the two processes that cause movement of the head: true wear (the removal of polyethylene particles) and so-called bedding-in (other factors, such as creep and settling-in of the liner). By analyzing radiographs made over time, researchers can distinguish true wear from the bedding-in process. The purpose of the current study was to compare the wear performance of the initial modular acetabular cup design (so-called first-generation components) of three different manufacturers with that of a so-called second-generation component made by one of the manufacturers. METHODS: A two-dimensional computerized radiographic method was used to analyze 1300 radiographs of 315 hips that were followed for 3.0 to 10.5 years. Temporal penetration by the head in the three groups of first-generation cups was compared with penetration in the group of second-generation cups. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to model penetration-versus-time data as a line for each group. The slope of each regression line indicated the true rate of wear, and the intercept of the regression line indicated the amount of bedding-in. RESULTS: Modifications in the design of the second-generation components, including thicker polyethylene and an improved locking mechanism, led to a decrease in the mean penetration by the head; however, the second-generation component did not have a lower true rate of wear than two of the first-generation components. Rather, the decreased penetration by the head into the second-generation component resulted from decreased bedding-in of the liner. CONCLUSIONS: These findings and this technique of analysis are clinically relevant to surgeons who evaluate polyethylene wear radiographically. First, penetration by the head in the early postoperative years might not be due entirely to abrasive wear of the polyethylene liner but, rather, to a change in the position of the head resulting from the bedding-in process. The inclusion of bedding-in in calculations of wear artificially inflates the rate of wear and may result in a misrepresentation of the potential risk of wear-related complications. This is especially true with regard to comparisons of different designs of modular cups, in which conformity and tolerances between the polyethylene liner and the metal shell can vary greatly. Second, analysis of penetration by the head at multiple time-intervals can be used to distinguish true polyethylene wear from the bedding-in process. Such an analysis allows more accurate determination of the true rates of wear of different designs of modular cups and, therefore, of potential wear-related complications.

Analysis of prosthetic femoral heads retrieved at autopsy.

This study examined 24 prosthetic femoral heads retrieved at autopsy from patients with clinically and radiographically successful arthroplasties. Four alumina ceramic and 20 cobalt chrome heads in service for an average of 8.5 years were examined with a contact and a laser stylus profilometer. The authors documented general increases in surface roughness of the cobalt chrome and ceramic femoral heads attributable to in vivo articulation and also observed wear polishing around the apical region of the cobalt chrome heads. The roughness of the prosthetic femoral heads was compared with the polyethylene wear in the matching liners. No relationship was found between femoral head roughness values and polyethylene wear or component duration in situ. The only variable related to the pattern of head roughness and polyethylene wear was the presence of embedded particle debris in the polyethylene liner. Roughness parameters for cobalt chrome heads without embedded debris in the polyethylene liner were fairly uniform around the head. Roughness values, which were higher for heads associated with debris, had a decreasing gradient of surface roughness from the equator to the apex. In addition, the polyethylene wear rate for cups with embedded particle debris in the liner was significantly greater than the wear rate for cups without embedded debris. This study also showed a strong correlation between surface roughness values measured with the contact profilometer and values measured with the noncontact laser profilometer. However, laser profilometer values were four to six times higher, indicating that roughness parameters measured by the two different profilometers cannot be compared directly. Findings of this study point consistently to the influence of third body wear particles on prosthetic femoral head roughness and polyethylene wear. These results stress the importance of minimizing all foreign body debris in maintaining a well functioning articular couple.

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional radiographic measurements of polyethylene wear.

Because polyethylene wear adversely affects the outcome of total hip arthroplasty, reliable techniques for in vivo radiographic evaluation of femoral head penetration into the polyethylene liner are needed. With the recent development of software to measure three-dimensional femoral head penetration, the adequacy of two-dimensional head penetration measurements to estimate a three-dimensional process has been questioned. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to compare directly two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographic measurements of femoral head penetration. Using two computer assisted radiographic techniques, the authors of this study measured the two-dimensional and the three-dimensional penetration of the femoral head into the polyethylene liner in 202 hips implanted with porous coated acetabular components. A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements showed that, on average, the mean amount of three-dimensional head penetration was larger than the mean amount of two-dimensional head penetration. However, linear regression analysis showed that the two measurements were highly correlated (r2 = 0.87, slope = 0.99, intercept = 0.08 mm). For most patients (95%), two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements of femoral head penetration were nearly equal. However, there was a small subset of patients (5%) for whom three-dimensional radiographic penetration measurements were three times greater than corresponding two-dimensional radiographic penetration measurements. No common risk factor among this small subset of patients was identified. The current study provides practical information for the orthopaedic surgeon trying to assess polyethylene wear in hip replacement cases. It shows that for most patients head penetration can be measured sufficiently from anteroposterior radiographs alone. However, in a small percentage of patients (5% in the current study) the femoral head also moves perpendicular to the plane of the anteroposterior radiograph. For these cases, accurate analysis of head penetration requires three-dimensional analysis using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.

Examination of wear in Duraloc acetabular components: two- to five-year evaluation of Hylamer and Enduron liners.

To help increase the longevity of polyethylene components used in total joint arthroplasty, new forms of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) have been developed. This study reports on the in vivo performance of Hylamer (DePuy DuPont Orthopaedics, Newark, DE), a high crystalline form of UHMWPE, and on the performance of conventional Enduron polyethylene (DePuy, Warsaw, IN). With the use of a specially designed computer system, the time course of two-dimensional femoral head penetration into 80 Hylamer and 140 Enduron acetabular liners in situ from two to five years was compared. At the most recent follow-up (mean, 3.6 years), the rate of femoral head penetration into the Hylamer liners was lower than the rate of head penetration into the Enduron liners (0.15 mm/year versus 0.20 mm/year, P = . 10). Temporal analysis revealed that the Hylamer liners had lower penetration rates than those of the conventional polyethylene liners in the first three postoperative years, but that head-penetration rates between the two groups became similar with increased time in situ. Continued examination of both types of polyethylene components is imperative before conclusions on long-term performance can be drawn.

Incidence of late bead shedding from uncemented porous coated cups. A radiographic evaluation.

A radiographic study was performed on late head separation from the porous surface of clinically well functioning and radiographically stable Arthropor uncemented acetabular components. Of 104 cups in 102 patients, 11 (10.6%) showed bead separation from the porous coated surface. Bead shedding occurred at an average of 4.2 years (range, 2-7 years). In each case the phenomenon was progressive. In the group that shed beads, there was a higher prevalence of acetabular radiolucencies (63.6% versus 25.8%) and of osteolysis (45.5% versus 10.8%). These differences were statistically significant. The group that shed beads also had a higher polyethylene wear rate (0.21 mm/year versus 0.16 mm/year) and were younger (49.5 years versus 59.5 years). All cups that shed beads remained clinically and radiographically stable. Thus, the clinical impact of these observations is uncertain. However, the higher prevalence of acetabular lucencies and osteolysis in these patients, in combination with an increased polyethylene wear rate, require thorough clinical and radiographic followup to uncover potential loosening problems of these acetabular components.

Radiographic evaluation of penetration by the femoral head into the polyethylene liner over time.

UNLABELLED: We examined the pattern of temporal penetration by thirty-two-millimeter-diameter femoral heads into polyethylene liners in a group of 105 hips (103 patients) in which an Arthropor metal-backed cup had been implanted. Each patient was evaluated radiographically and clinically at a minimum of four different postoperative intervals. The initial evaluation was performed a mean of 2.9 weeks (range, one to fifteen weeks) postoperatively, and the latest evaluation was performed a mean of 7.9 years (range, five to ten years) postoperatively. Two-dimensional wear - that is, penetration by the femoral head into the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene liner - was determined from anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis with a computer analysis system that calculated the change in the position of the center of the head relative to the center of the cup. Three new findings are reported. First, there was a large difference (mean, 1.1 millimeters) between the center of the head and that of the cup as measured on the initial postoperative radiographs. This difference underscores the need for researchers to consider the initial displacement of the head when measuring and reporting polyethylene wear. Second, although there was wide variation in responses among individuals, temporal examination of the data revealed a trend toward a decreasing rate of penetration with time. Moreover, the rate of penetration appeared to reach a steady-state value after the sixth postoperative year and remained nearly constant until the ninth postoperative year. Third, by comparing the subsets of patients who had the greatest and the least initial penetration by the head, we found that penetration behavior, although remarkably different between the groups in the first three years postoperatively, became similar with time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When making decisions regarding individual patients or hip systems that demonstrate penetration by the femoral head into the polyethylene liner, clinicians should consider the patterns of penetration over time. Measurements of the amount and rate of penetration that are based solely on the most recent radiograph do not represent the full clinical picture. We advocate more frequent radiographic follow-up and, when available, analysis of serial radiographs for patients who have excessive penetration by the femoral head into the acetabular liner.

The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement.

Previous studies evaluating femoral remodeling after total hip arthroplasty have used clinical radiographs and dual energy xray absorptiometry. Limitation of these techniques make it impossible to quantify the magnitude of bone loss in terms of cortical thinning and cortical bone area and bone mineral density changes. Femoral cortical bone remodeling after cemented and cementless replacement was quantified and possible determinants of bone remodeling in terms of clinical and radiographic variables were evaluated. Forty-eight anatomic specimen femora from 24 patients with unilateral cemented and cementless hip replacements were analyzed. Cortical thickness, cortical bone area, and bone mineral density was assessed in 4 quadrants at 5 discrete levels. The maximum cortical bone loss by level was at the middle section for the cemented femurs and at the midproximal and middle sections for the cementless femurs. However, if one examines individual quadrants, the proximal medial cortex still represents the specific region of maximal bone loss for both types of implant fixation. The posterior cortex had substantially more bone loss, even in the diaphyseal levels, than had been previously appreciated. A strong correlation was noted between the bone mineral density of the control femur and the percentage decrease of bone mineral density in the remodeled femur. Based on this data, it seems that the less dense the bone is before hip replacement surgery, the greater the extent of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty regardless of the fixation type.

Bone remodeling around cementless hip implants.

Bone remodeling results from the adaptation of bone to the stresses that act upon it. The insertion of an endoprosthesis into a femur changes the stress distribution within the femur, causing the bone to remodel. In this paper, we show how radiographic bone remodeling changes can be used to determine implant fixation and how bone remodeling changes can be quantitated by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis as well as computer-assisted videodensitometry.