Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 20(7): 497-501, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18502105

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Serial photographs have been collected prospectively to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy on normal tissues in the breast. The aim of this study was to compare two methods of scoring radiation-induced changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five-year photographs of 400 patients randomised to receive either 42.9 or 39 Gy in 13 fractions to the whole breast after tumour excision of early breast cancer were compared with a post-surgery baseline and scored for change in breast appearance on a three-point graded scale. Two alternative methods of scoring using three observers were compared: (a) scores allocated independently, with independent resolution of discrepancies, and (b) scores allocated by consensus. RESULTS: Treatment effects estimated from the consensus and independent scores were very similar (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.96 vs 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.50-3.47, respectively). Agreement between the scores obtained from each method was reasonable, and the repeatability of the consensus method was good. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus method of scoring photographic change in breast appearance seems to be no less sensitive to randomised dose as the independent method of assessment, but is much quicker to administer. The consensus method has been used to score over 3000 sets of photographs in the National Cancer Research Institute Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy trial.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Photography , Breast Neoplasms/classification , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Confidence Intervals , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors
2.
Lancet ; 371(9618): 1098-107, 2008 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18355913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The international standard radiotherapy schedule for early breast cancer delivers 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2.0 Gy over 5 weeks, but there is a long history of non-standard regimens delivering a lower total dose using fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation). We aimed to test the benefits of radiotherapy schedules using fraction sizes larger than 2.0 Gy in terms of local-regional tumour control, normal tissue responses, quality of life, and economic consequences in women prescribed post-operative radiotherapy. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2001, 2215 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 23 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2.0 Gy over 5 weeks or 40 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy over 3 weeks. Women were eligible for the trial if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. FINDINGS: 1105 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group and 1110 to the 40 Gy group. After a median follow up of 6.0 years (IQR 5.0-6.2) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 2.2% (95% CI 1.3-3.1) in the 40 Gy group and 3.3% (95% CI 2.2 to 4.5) in the 50 Gy group, representing an absolute difference of -0.7% (95% CI -1.7% to 0.9%)--ie, the absolute difference in local-regional relapse could be up to 1.7% better and at most 1% worse after 40 Gy than after 50 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments indicated lower rates of late adverse effects after 40 Gy than after 50 Gy. INTERPRETATION: A radiation schedule delivering 40 Gy in 15 fractions seems to offer rates of local-regional tumour relapse and late adverse effects at least as favourable as the standard schedule of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Proportional Hazards Models , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy Dosage , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
3.
Lancet Oncol ; 9(4): 331-41, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18356109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The international standard radiotherapy schedule for breast cancer treatment delivers a high total dose in 25 small daily doses (fractions). However, a lower total dose delivered in fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation) is hypothesised to be at least as safe and effective as the standard treatment. We tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction schedule against the standard regimen with the aim of measuring the sensitivity of normal and malignant tissues to fraction size. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002, 2236 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 17 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2.0 Gy versus 41.6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions of 3.2 Gy or 3.0 Gy over 5 weeks. Women were eligible if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate surgical reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. FINDINGS: 749 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group, 750 to the 41.6 Gy group, and 737 to the 39 Gy group. After a median follow up of 5.1 years (IQR 4.4-6.0) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 3.6% (95% CI 2.2-5.1) after 50 Gy, 3.5% (95% CI 2.1-4.3) after 41.6 Gy, and 5.2% (95% CI 3.5-6.9) after 39 Gy. The estimated absolute differences in 5-year local-regional relapse rates compared with 50 Gy were 0.2% (95% CI -1.3% to 2.6%) after 41.6 Gy and 0.9% (95% CI -0.8% to 3.7%) after 39 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments suggested lower rates of late adverse effects after 39 Gy than with 50 Gy, with an HR for late change in breast appearance (photographic) of 0.69 (95% CI 0.52-0.91, p=0.01). From a planned meta-analysis with the pilot trial, the adjusted estimates of alpha/beta value for tumour control was 4.6 Gy (95% CI 1.1-8.1) and for late change in breast appearance (photographic) was 3.4 Gy (95% CI 2.3-4.5). INTERPRETATION: The data are consistent with the hypothesis that breast cancer and the dose-limiting normal tissues respond similarly to change in radiotherapy fraction size. 41.6 Gy in 13 fractions was similar to the control regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions in terms of local-regional tumour control and late normal tissue effects, a result consistent with the result of START Trial B. A lower total dose in a smaller number of fractions could offer similar rates of tumour control and normal tissue damage as the international standard fractionation schedule of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Confidence Intervals , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pilot Projects , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy Dosage/standards , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
5.
Biotechnology (N Y) ; 9(1): 64-8, 1991 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1367214

ABSTRACT

We have cloned the light and heavy chain cDNAs for the humanized monoclonal antibody Campath-1H and expressed them in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells using a dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) amplification procedure. Each cDNA was positioned under control of the strong human beta-actin promoter/polyadenylation signals and used to evaluate alternative vector design and amplification procedures. By employing a dual selection co-transfection strategy, initial transformants accumulated antibody levels of 0.5 micrograms/ml after 4 days continuous culture. When subjected to successive rounds of selection in medium containing stepwise increments in methotrexate (MTX), stable cell lines were obtained that secreted up to 200 micrograms/ml of Campath-1H during the same period. This reflects a productivity of 100 micrograms/10(6) cells/day and demonstrates the potential of engineering CHO cells for the production of recombinant antibodies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/biosynthesis , Antigens, CD/immunology , Antigens, Neoplasm , Glycoproteins , Actins/genetics , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/genetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/metabolism , Antibody-Producing Cells/metabolism , CD52 Antigen , Cells, Cultured , Cloning, Molecular , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , DNA/genetics , Female , Gene Amplification , Gene Expression , Genetic Vectors/physiology , Humans , Kinetics , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Rats , Recombinant Proteins/biosynthesis , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Tumor Cells, Cultured
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...