Emergent Subtotal Colectomies Have Higher Leak Rates in Subsequent J-Pouch Stages.

PURPOSE: The most common surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) is the staged restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). On occasion, an emergent first-stage subtotal colectomy must be performed. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of postoperative complications in three-stage IPAA patients who underwent emergent vs non-emergent first-stage subtotal colectomies in the subsequent staged procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review conducted at a single tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. All UC or IBD-Unspecified patients who underwent a three-stage IPAA between 2008 and 2017 were identified. Emergent surgery was defined as that performed on an inpatient who had perforation, toxic megacolon, uncontrolled hemorrhage, or septic shock. The primary outcomes were the presence of anastomotic leak, obstruction, bleeding, and the need for reoperation for each within a 6-month postoperative period of the second (RPC with IPAA and DLI) and third surgical stages (ileostomy reversal). RESULTS: A total of 342 patients underwent a three-stage IPAA, of which 30 (9.4%) had emergent first-stage operations. Patients who underwent an emergent STC were more likely to have a post-operative anastomotic leak and need an additional procedure following the subsequent second and third-staged operations on both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). No difference was found for obstruction, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, or bleeding (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Three-stage IPAA patients with emergent first-stage subtotal colectomies were more likely to have a post-operative anastomotic leak and need an additional procedure for a leak following the subsequent second- and third-stage operations.

Concordance of financial disclosures among faculty at the 2018-2020 SAGES annual meetings.

BACKGROUND: Financial relationships with industry may bias educational content delivered by physicians. SAGES strives to mitigate potential bias, relying on physician self-reporting. Retrospective review of relationships is possible using the Open Payments Database (OPD), a public record of industry-reported payments to US physicians. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the SAGES disclosure process by comparing faculty disclosures to SAGES, faculty disclosures within presentations, and OPD records among speakers at the 2018-2020 SAGES meetings. METHODS: We reviewed all presentations from the SAGES 2018-2020 Annual Meetings. For each invited presentation, all slide-disclosed relationships were recorded. For US physicians, we queried the OPD and recorded relationships ≥ $500 USD in the calendar year prior to presentation. We compared the slide-disclosed relationships with OPD-reported relationships and with those provided to SAGES during the faculty disclosure process. We surveyed a sample of the 2020 annual meeting speakers to analyze potential reasons for discordance. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, there were 1,355 invited presentations, of which 1,234 (91%) were available for review. Disclosure slides were present in 1,098 (89%), increasing from 86% in 2018 to 93% in 2020. The proportion of speakers with OPD-reported relationships ≥ $500 increased from 54% in 2018 to 66% in 2020. The total value of OPD relationships decreased from $5.9 million (2018) to $3.3 million (2020) with a concomitant decrease in the proportion with high discordance from 9% in 2018 to 5% in 2020. Among the 2020 speakers with high discordance, the most common explanations for discordance were being unaware of payment or payment outside the 12-month timeframe (55%). CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between financial disclosures reported to SAGES and OPD highlight the need for improvements in the faculty disclosure process. SAGES will continue to streamline this process by incorporating faculty review of their OPD disclosures to ensure all educational programs remain free of commercial bias.

Slow and Steady Wins the Race: A Solid Case for a 3-Stage Approach in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis require surgery during their disease course, of which the most common is the staged restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the rates of anastomotic leaks among all staged restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA procedures. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary care IBD center. PATIENTS: All patients with ulcerative colitis or IBD-unspecified who underwent a primary total proctocolectomy with IPAA for medically refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was anastomotic leak within a 6-month postoperative period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare patients with and without anastomotic leaks. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 584 nonemergent patients, of whom 50 (8.6%) underwent 1-stage, 162 (27.7%) underwent 2-stage, 58 (9.9%) underwent modified 2-stage, and 314 (53.7%) underwent a 3-stage total proctocolectomy with IPAA. The primary indication was medically refractory disease in 488 patients and dysplasia/cancer in 101 patients. Anastomotic leak occurred in 10 patients (3.2%) after 3-stage, 14 patients (8.6%) after 2-stage, 6 patients (10.3%) after modified 2-stage, and 10 patients (20.0%) after a 1-stage procedure. A 3-stage procedure had fewer leaks and additional procedures for leaks compared with 1- and modified 2-stage procedures (p < 0.03). The 3-stage procedure had fewer combined anastomotic leaks and pelvic abscesses than all of the other staged procedures (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design and evolving electronic medical charts system. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-stage total proctocolectomy with IPAA is the optimal staged method in ulcerative colitis to reduce leaks and related complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B693. LENTO Y CONSTANTE GANA LA CARRERA UN CASO SLIDO PARA UN ENFOQUE DE TRES ETAPAS EN LA COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANTECEDENTES:Aproximadamente el 10-20% de los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa requieren cirugía durante el curso de su enfermedad, de los cuales la más común es la proctocolectomía restauradora escalonada con anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue comparar las tasas de fugas anastomóticas entre todos los procedimientos de proctocolectomía restauradora por etapas con procedimiento de anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un único centro de atención terciaria de tercer nivel para enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.PACIENTES:Se identificaron todos los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa o enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal inespecífica que se sometieron a una proctocolectomía total primaria mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal por enfermedad médicamente refractaria o displasia entre 2008 y 2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la fuga anastomótica dentro de un período posoperatorio de seis meses. Se utilizó regresión logística univariante y multivariante para comparar pacientes con y sin fugas anastomóticas.RESULTADOS:La muestra estuvo compuesta por 584 pacientes no emergentes, de los cuales 50 (8,6%) se sometieron a una etapa, 162 (27,7%) se sometieron a dos etapas, 58 (9,9%) se sometieron a modificación en dos etapas y 314 (53,7%) se sometieron a una proctocolectomía total en tres tiempos mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal. La indicación principal fue enfermedad médicamente refractaria en 488 pacientes y displasia / cáncer en 101 pacientes. Se produjo una fuga anastomótica en 10 (3,2%) pacientes después de tres etapas, 14 (8,6%) pacientes después de dos etapas, 6 (10,3%) pacientes después de dos etapas modificadas y 10 (20,0%) pacientes después de una etapa procedimiento. Un procedimiento de tres etapas tuvo menos fugas y procedimientos adicionales para las fugas en comparación con los procedimientos de una y dos etapas modificadas (p <0.03). El procedimiento de tres etapas tuvo menos fugas anastomóticas y abscesos pélvicos combinados que todos los demás procedimientos por etapas (p <0,05).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y su sistema de registros médicos electrónicos en evolución.CONCLUSIONES:La proctocolectomía total en tres etapas mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal es el método óptimo por etapas en la colitis ulcerosa para reducir las fugas y las complicaciones relacionadas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B693.