A hybrid clampless technique for aortic anastomoses.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In various circumstances of aortic repairs (heavy circumferential calcifications or shaggy aorta with extensive thrombus), open and endovascular techniques are at high risk. In addition to a likelihood of emboli, aortic clamping can be complicated by rupture and endovascular techniques may not be successful. We here describe a simple and reproducible hybrid technique that allows performing an aortic anastomosis without clamping in these situations. METHODS: After a limited exposure of the anterior aortic wall in a healthy segment, a prosthetic graft is sutured without any arteriotomy or clamping (adventitial suture), mimicking the final aspect of an end-to-side anastomosis. The graft and the anastomosis site are punctured using a long needle, allowing a guidewire to be positioned in the aorta under fluoroscopic guidance. Protected covered stenting of the anastomosis site opens the anastomosis without aortic clamping. After tunneling the graft to the target artery, the distal anastomosis is performed in a usual fashion. RESULTS: This technique was successfully used in 10 challenging consecutive cases with a sustained patency. CONCLUSIONS: This hybrid clampless technique for aortic anastomosis represents a useful alternative for challenging lesions unsuitable for a simple open or endovascular treatment.

A Simple Technique to Perform Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with a Very Low Dose of Iodine Contrast Media.

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) dose is a major factor for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (glomerular function rate [GFR] <30 mL/min) during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Fusion imaging in hybrid rooms and carbon dioxide angiography represent alternatives but are limited by significant cost and availability. We here describe a simple technique allowing EVAR with a limited ICM dose (<5 mL). Using a standard C-arm, the lowest renal artery and the hypogastric arteries are blindly catheterized based on noncontrast pre-operative imaging (duplex-scan associated with noncontrast computed tomography scan and/or magnetic resonance angiography). An injection of diluted ICM (1 mL ICM + 4 mL saline) can be performed to confirm the correct catheterisation and angiography catheters are let in place as landmarks. Ten patients with GFRs between 17 and 29 ml/min were successfully treated using these tips (median ICM = 3 mL) without postoperative AKI and satisfactory mid-term results.

Practice patterns of dialysis access and outcomes in patients wait-listed early for kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Early kidney transplantation (KT) is the best option for patients with end-stage kidney disease, but little is known about dialysis access strategy in this context. We studied practice patterns of dialysis access and how they relate with outcomes in adults wait-listed early for KT according to the intended donor source. METHODS: This study from the REIN registry (2002-2014) included 9331 incident dialysis patients (age 18-69) wait-listed for KT before or by 6 months after starting dialysis: 8342 candidates for deceased-donor KT and 989 for living-donor KT. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) of KT and death associated with hemodialysis by catheter or peritoneal dialysis compared with arteriovenous (AV) access were estimated with Fine and Gray models. RESULTS: Living-donor candidates used pretransplant peritoneal dialysis at rates similar to deceased-donor KT candidates, but had significantly more frequent catheter than AV access for hemodialysis (adjusted OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.09-1.43). Over a median follow-up of 43 (IQR: 23-67) months, 6063 patients received transplants and 305 died before KT. Median duration of pretransplant dialysis was 15 (7-27) months for deceased-donor recipients and 9 (5-15) for living-donor recipients. Catheter use in deceased-donor candidates was associated with a lower SHR for KT (0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.94) and a higher SHR for death (1.53, 95%CI 1.14-2.04). Only five deaths occurred in living-donor candidates, three of them with catheter use. CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant dialysis duration may be quite long even when planned with a living donor. Advantages from protecting these patients from AV fistula creation must be carefully evaluated against catheter-related risks.

Multicentre Experience with the Chimney Technique for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in French University Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: The chimney technique (ChEVAR) allows for proximal landing zone extension for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms. The aim of the present study was to assess ChEVAR national outcomes in French university hospital centres. METHODS: All centres were contacted and entered data into a computerised online database on a voluntary basis. Clinical and radiological data were collected on all consecutive ChEVAR patients operated on in 14 centres between 2008 and 2016. Patients were deemed unfit for open repair. Factors associated with early (30 day or in hospital) mortality and type 1 endoleak (Type I EL) were calculated using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: In total, 201 patients with 343 target vessels were treated. There were 94 juxtarenal (46.8%), 67 pararenal (33.3%), 10 Crawford type IV thoraco-abdominal (5%) aneurysms, and 30 (15.1%) proximal failures of prior repairs. The pre-operative diameter was 66.8 ± 16.7 mm and 28 (13.9%) ChEVAR were performed as an emergency, including six (2.9%) ruptures. There were 23 (11.7%) unplanned intra-operative procedures, mainly related to access issues. The rate of early deaths was 11.4% (n = 23). The elective mortality rate was 9.8% (n = 17). Nine patients (4.5%) presented with a stroke. The rate of early proximal Type I EL was 11.9%. Survival was 84.6%, 79.4%, 73.9%, 71.1% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. The primary patency of chimney stents was 97.4%, 96.7%, 95.2%, and 93.3% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Performing unplanned intra-operative procedures (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-10.9) was identified as the only independent predictor of post-operative death. A ChEVAR for juxtarenal aneurysm was independently associated with fewer post-operative Type I ELs (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.58). CONCLUSION: In this large national ChEVAR series, early results were concerning. The reasons may lie in heterogeneous practices between centres and ChEVAR use outside of current recommendations regarding oversizing rates, endograft types, and sealing zones. Future research should focus on improvements in pre-operative planning and intra-operative technical aspects.

A Very Unlucky Intraoperative Event During a Chimney Technique for Juxtarenal Aneurysm Exclusion.

A two-vessel Ch-EVAR procedure was scheduled within the instructions for use of the devices. After deploying, it appeared that the long sheath inserted through an arm access was discovered to be trapped behind the aortic stentgraft barbs. Trying to remove the sheath, the graft was displaced upward and the procedure was converted for a three-vessel Ch-EVAR incorporating the superior mesenteric artery. Simultaneous ballooning of the target vessels and the stentgraft permitted to exert a strong pullback traction on the blocked sheath, allowing its removal. A segment of the sheath distal end was left trapped in the aortic stentgraft. At 12 months follow-up, the patient is free of any complications and there are no occlusions of the abdominal visceral branches or embolic events in peripheral arteries.

Eligibility Rates for Ambulatory EVAR.

BACKGROUND: The current results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) and the wide use of percutaneous closure systems suggest that ambulatory treatment is feasible in selected patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of eligibility to ambulatory EVAR (EVAR-Ambu) and its potential medicoeconomic impact. METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2016, 245 patients were operated of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in our center. The 128 patients whose anatomy was unfavorable with EVAR, which were operated in urgency or who were classified as American society of anesthesiologists 4, were excluded from the study. The 117 remaining files were reexamined to evaluate the eligibility for EVAR-Ambu retrospectively. The patients were considered as eligible if they presented all the following criteria: (1) normal surgical risk, (2) logistic feasibility of an ambulatory procedure (home <1 hr away from the hospital, available relatives), and (3) anatomical criteria of percutaneous feasibility according to angio-computed tomography. The surgical risk was evaluated according to the French High Health Authority (HAS) and the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) score. The balance between costs and revenue was evaluated for each patient according to the length of stay. RESULTS: Among the 117 patients, 43 (37%) and 57 (49%) were eligible for EVAR-Ambu by percutaneous route according to whether the surgical risk was assessed according to the HAS or the SVS criteria. If a conventional surgical approach was considered as compatible with EVAR-Ambu, 12 (10%) and 13 (11%) additional patients were eligible according to whether the surgical risk was assessed according to the HAS or the SVS criteria, respectively. In terms of medicoeconomic evaluation, the cost of the initial intervention depended was mainly on the cost of the stent graft and the operating room services. The cost spent of 1 night conventional hospitalization (CH) after EVAR was 603€ per day versus 490€ in the Day Surgery Unit (DSU). In comparison, the revenue for the institution was identical for DSU and a 1-night CH. According to our estimates, the balance between revenue and expenditures amounted to +122€ per patient for EVAR-Ambu versus +10€ or +119€ per patient hospitalized 1 or 2 nights, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR-Ambu is possible in a substantial proportion of patients treated for infrarenal AAA. Its medicoeconomic interest is real for the health system although it appears low at the individual level. The safety of this approach in clinical practice must be confirmed by a prospective study in selected patients.

Three Hundred Fifty-One Patients With Pneumothorax Undergoing Uniportal (Single Port) Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is usually performed using three ports. Uniportal VATS has not yet been widely developed. We report our single institution experience in uniportal VATS for the surgical management of 351 patients with pneumothorax. METHODS: Between November 2009 and February 2016, we conducted a study in 351 patients treated for pneumothorax using uniportal VATS. Resection of apical bullae associated with partial pleurectomy, pleural abrasion, or talc effusion was performed. RESULTS: The mean age was 29.6 ± 10.1 years. Surgical indications were mainly persistence or recurrence of pneumothorax. Sixty-seven patients (19%) presented with complications. At the 30-day control, 60.1% of patients were asymptomatic; 85% of patients were satisfied with the single small scar. The recurrence rate was 3.6% at 24 ± 13 months. CONCLUSIONS: Uniportal VATS is feasible, safe, and reproducible in the treatment of pneumothorax. Morbidity is similar to multiport VATS. The recurrence rate is comparable with best results after multiport VATS or thoracotomy. Patients were satisfied with the single small scar.