Coping With Depressive Symptoms in Young Adults: Perceived Social Support Protects Against Depressive Symptoms Only Under Moderate Levels of Stress.

Introduction: The interrelationship between social support, depressive symptoms, stress and self-esteem in young adults remains unclear. This study aims to test the mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between social support and depressive symptoms and the moderating role of perceived stress in the relationship between the two. This is important to inform components of future intervention development targeting youth depression. Methods: Three hundred forty-four (N = 344) young adults in Cyprus aged 17-26 (78% female) completed measures of self-esteem, social support, depressive symptoms, and perceived stress. Structural equation models were used to examine the interactions between social support and depressive psychopathology, whereas mediational analyses were run to examine the mediating role of self-esteem. Latent moderated mediation models were applied to examine the potentially moderating role of perceived stress. Results: Perceived social support from family and friends were significantly related to lower depressive symptoms. Self-esteem fully mediated the relationship between perceived family support and depressive symptoms. Perceived stress moderated the model, and perceived social support was found to be more protective against depressive symptoms when moderate levels of stress were presented. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that social support is protective against depressive symptoms. Self-esteem and perceived stress are important mechanisms that interact with this effect. Implications include the efforts to increase perceived family support during college years and management of stress levels before working with depressive symptoms.

Externalizing and internalizing behaviours in adolescence, and the importance of parental behavioural and psychological control practices.

The aims of the present study were to explore the impact of parental characteristics (behavioural control and psychological control) on adolescents' expression of externalizing and internalizing behaviours. To address the aim of the study, participants completed quantitative measures; the study included 538 adolescents and their mothers and fathers. Overall, 513 mothers and 464 fathers participated in the study. Adolescents completed the Children's Report on Parent Behaviour Inventory (CRPBI), while parents completed the Child Behaviour Checklist - Parent Report (Short Form; CBCL). Results of the study showed that only maternal and paternal psychological control predicted externalizing and internalizing behaviours. The conclusions have practical applications, as they can provide novel approaches in parent training programmes. Furthermore, results are discussed in relation to the connection with earlier studies and the theoretical contribution.

The health locus of control concept: Factorial structure, psychometric properties and form equivalence of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scales.

Contradictory evidence exists on the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale's factor structure and the psychometric equivalence between Form A and Form B. University students (N = 359) completed the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control and General Self-Efficacy scales. The three-factor model had better fit and parsimony in both Forms. 'Internal' scale negatively correlated with 'chance' but positively with 'others'. The two external scales positively correlated. The scales' reliability was satisfactory, but the two Forms were not psychometrically equivalent. Convergent validity was confirmed. The evidence suggests a three-factor structure and psychometric non-equivalence of the two Forms. Researchers should make an informed choice on which Form to use.

Variability of different reference bodies in normal, keratoconus, and collagen crosslinked corneas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of different Scheimpflug imaging-derived reference bodies in normal, keratoconus (KC), and crosslinked (CXL) eyes. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, 40 participants populated the control group (CG), while 33 and 34 patients formed the KC group and the CXL group, respectively. One eye was randomly selected when both were eligible. Elevation measurements were obtained using Scheimpflug camera, by applying the following reference bodies: the best fit sphere (BFS), the best fit toric ellipsoid (BFTE), the best fit toric ellipsoid with fixed eccentricity of 0.4 (BFTEF), the best fit ellipsoid (BFE), and the best fit torus, by 2 operators in 2 sessions. The variability of different reference bodies' parameters was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Differences between operators were nonsignificant for all reference bodies' parameters in all study groups (p>0.1). Regarding CG, BFS for both operators and BFTE for operator 1 presented the best intrasession repeatability (majority of ICCs >0.90), while average interobserver reliability was recorded for the majority of reference bodies' parameters. Regarding KC and CXL groups, BFS, BFTEF, and BFE reference bodies demonstrated the best intrasession and interobserver reproducibility (majority of ICCs >0.90) for both groups. Steep and flat radius parameters presented the best overall reproducibility, with the majority of ICCs for all reference bodies ranging above 0.90, in all study groups. CONCLUSIONS: High variability was encountered for most reference surfaces. Ellipsotoric surfaces presented acceptable repeatability in KC and post-CXL corneas.