Retrospective Cohort Study of Frequency and Patterns of Orbital Injuries on Whole-Body CT with Maxillofacial Multi-Slice CT.

Background: High-impact trauma frequently leads to injuries of the orbit, but literature focusing on the viscerocranium rather than the neurocranium is underrepresented. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2006-2014) at an urban level 1 trauma center assessing the frequency and typical patterns of orbital injuries on whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) with maxillofacial multi-slice CT (MSCT) after severe trauma. (1) Screening of consecutive WBCT cases for dedicated maxillofacial MSCT. (2) Examination by two independent experts' radiologists for (peri-/)orbital injuries. (3) Case review for trauma mechanisms. Results: 1061 WBCT were included revealing 250 (23.6%) patients with orbital injuries. Less than one-quarter (23.3%) of patients showed osseous and 9.5% showed soft tissue injuries. Combined osseous and soft tissue lesions were present in 39.2% of orbital injuries, isolated soft tissue injuries were rare. Single- or two-wall fractures of the orbit were prevalent, and the orbital floor was affected in 67% of fractures. Dislocated extraocular muscles (44.6%), deformation of the ocular globe (23.8%), and elongation of the optic nerve (12.9%) were the most frequently soft tissue findings. Vascular trauma was suspected in 15.8% of patients. Conclusions: Orbital trauma was confirmed in 23.6% of cases with suspected facial injuries after severe trauma. Concomitant soft tissue injuries should be excluded explicitly in cases with orbital fractures to prevent loss of vision or ocular motility.

The Accuracy of On-Call CT Reporting in Teleradiology Networks in Comparison to In-House Reporting.

(1) Background: We aimed to compare the accuracy of after-hours CT reports created in a traditional in-house setting versus a teleradiology setting by assessing the discrepancy rates between preliminary and final reports. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective study to determine the number and severity of discrepancies between preliminary and final reports for 7761 consecutive after-hours CT scans collected over a 21-month period. CT exams were performed during on-call hours and were proofread by an attending the next day. Discrepancies between preliminary and gold-standard reports were evaluated by two senior attending radiologists, and differences in rates were assessed for statistical significance. (3) Results: A total of 7209 reports were included in the analysis. Discrepancies occurred in 1215/7209 cases (17%). Among these, 433/7209 reports (6%) showed clinically important differences between the preliminary and final reports. A total of 335/5509 of them were in-house reports (6.1%), and 98/1700 were teleradiology reports (5.8%). The relative frequencies of report changes were not significantly higher in teleradiology. (4) Conclusions: The accuracy of teleradiology reports was not inferior to that of in-house reports, with very similar clinically important differences rates found in both reporting situations.

Identifying communication-related predictors of patient satisfaction in a briefing prior to contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to prospectively investigate patients' satisfaction with briefings before computed tomography (CT) examinations, determine feasibility, and identify factors influencing patient satisfaction independent of patient and physician characteristics. METHODS: One hundred sixty patients received information by a radiologist prior to contrast-enhanced CT examinations in an open, prospective, two-center, cross-sectional study (including the introduction of the radiologist, procedure, radiation exposure, possible side effects, and alternatives). Afterwards, patients and radiologists evaluated the briefing using a standardized questionnaire. Additionally, factors such as age, socioeconomic status, inpatient/outpatient status, length of the radiologist's professional experience, duration of the briefing, clarity of the radiologist's explanations as perceived by patients, and the duration of communication were obtained in this questionnaire. Subsequently, three classes of influencing factors were defined and entered stepwise into a hierarchical regression. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction ratings differed significantly by type of hospitalization, perceived type of communication, and patient gender. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that perceived clarity was the strongest predictor of patients' satisfaction when controlling for the patient and physician characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Patients appeared to be satisfied with the briefing prior to CT examination. The mean briefing time (2 min 35 s) seemed feasible. Patients' demographics influenced satisfaction. To improve patients' satisfaction with briefings before contrast-enhanced CT, radiologists should aim to clarify their communication.

The so-called "bovine aortic arch": a possible biomarker for embolic strokes?

PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of the so-called bovine aortic arch variation (common origin of the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery) in embolic stroke patients, compared with a control group. METHODS: Aortic arch branching patterns were retrospectively evaluated in 474 individuals with (n = 152) and without (n = 322) acute embolic stroke of the anterior circulation. Contrast-enhanced CT scans of the chest and neck (arterial contrast phase, 1-2-mm slice thickness) were used to evaluate aortic arch anatomy. The stroke cohort included 152 patients who were treated for embolic strokes of the anterior circulation between 2008 and 2018. A total of 322 randomly selected patients who had received thoracic CT angiographies within the same time frame were included as a control group. RESULTS: With a prevalence of 25.7%, the bovine aortic arch variant was significantly more common among patients suffering from embolic strokes, compared with 17.1% of control patients (p = 0.039, OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.05-1.97). Stroke patients were more likely to show the bovine arch subtype B (left common carotid artery originating from the brachiocephalic trunk instead of the aortic arch) (10.5% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.039, OR = 2.25, 95%CI = 1.09-4.63), while subtype A (V-shaped common aortic origin of the brachiocephalic trunk and the left carotid) was similarly common in both groups. There was no significant difference regarding the frequency of other commonly observed variant branching patterns of the aortic arch. CONCLUSION: The bovine aortic arch, particularly the bovine arch subtype B, was significantly more common among embolic stroke patients. This might be due to altered hemodynamic properties within the bovine arch.