Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0134287, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26252526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Strategies to enhance the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines in humans include i) co-administration of molecular adjuvants, ii) intramuscular administration followed by in vivo electroporation (IM/EP) and/or iii) boosting with a different vaccine. Combining these strategies provided protection of macaques challenged with SIV; this clinical trial was designed to mimic the vaccine regimen in the SIV study. METHODS: Seventy five healthy, HIV-seronegative adults were enrolled into a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Multi-antigenic HIV (HIVMAG) plasmid DNA (pDNA) vaccine alone or co-administered with pDNA encoding human Interleukin 12 (IL-12) (GENEVAX IL-12) given by IM/EP using the TriGrid Delivery System was tested in different prime-boost regimens with recombinant Ad35 HIV vaccine given IM. RESULTS: All local reactions but one were mild or moderate. Systemic reactions and unsolicited adverse events including laboratory abnormalities did not differ between vaccine and placebo recipients. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. T cell and antibody response rates after HIVMAG (x3) prime-Ad35 (x1) boost were independent of IL-12, while the magnitude of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) ELISPOT responses was highest after HIVMAG (x3) without IL-12. The quality and phenotype of T cell responses shown by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) were similar between groups. Inhibition of HIV replication by autologous T cells was demonstrated after HIVMAG (x3) prime and was boosted after Ad35. HIV specific antibodies were detected only after Ad35 boost, although there was a priming effect with 3 doses of HIVMAG with or without IL-12. No anti-IL-12 antibodies were detected. CONCLUSION: The vaccines were safe, well tolerated and moderately immunogenic. Repeated administration IM/EP was well accepted. An adjuvant effect of co-administered plasmid IL-12 was not detected. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01496989.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/adverse effects , DNA, Viral/adverse effects , DNA, Viral/immunology , Electroporation , HIV Infections/immunology , Immunization, Secondary , Interleukin-12/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Adenoviridae/metabolism , Adult , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Demography , Double-Blind Method , Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay , Female , Flow Cytometry , HIV Antibodies/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Immunization , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Young Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0125954, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25961283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sequential prime-boost or co-administration of HIV vaccine candidates based on an adjuvanted clade B p24, RT, Nef, p17 fusion protein (F4/AS01) plus a non-replicating adenovirus 35 expressing clade A Gag, RT, Int and Nef (Ad35-GRIN) may lead to a unique immune profile, inducing both strong T-cell and antibody responses. METHODS: In a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 146 healthy adult volunteers were randomized to one of four regimens: heterologous prime-boost with two doses of F4/AS01E or F4/AS01B followed by Ad35-GRIN; Ad35-GRIN followed by two doses of F4/AS01B; or three co-administrations of Ad35-GRIN and F4/AS01B. T cell and antibody responses were measured. RESULTS: The vaccines were generally well-tolerated, and did not cause serious adverse events. The response rate, by IFN-γ ELISPOT, was greater when Ad35-GRIN was the priming vaccine and in the co-administration groups. F4/AS01 induced CD4+ T-cells expressing primarily CD40L and IL2 +/- TNF-α, while Ad35-GRIN induced predominantly CD8+ T-cells expressing IFN-γ +/- IL2 or TNF-α. Viral inhibition was induced after Ad35-GRIN vaccination, regardless of the regimen. Strong F4-specific antibody responses were induced. Immune responses persisted at least a year after the last vaccination. The complementary response profiles, characteristic of each vaccine, were both expressed after co-administration. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of an adjuvanted protein and an adenovirus vector showed an acceptable safety and reactogenicity profile and resulted in strong, multifunctional and complementary HIV-specific immune responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01264445.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Black People , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV-1/immunology , Healthy Volunteers , Human Immunodeficiency Virus Proteins/immunology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/administration & dosage , AIDS Vaccines/adverse effects , Adenoviridae/genetics , Adenoviridae/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Female , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Genetic Vectors/immunology , HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/genetics , Human Immunodeficiency Virus Proteins/genetics , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Interferon-gamma/biosynthesis , Interferon-gamma/blood , Male , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/metabolism , Vaccination , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...