Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Respir Care ; 63(3): 347-352, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29279365

ABSTRACT

Incentive spirometry (IS) is commonly prescribed to reduce pulmonary complications, despite limited evidence to support its benefits and a lack of consensus on optimal protocols for its use. Although numerous studies and meta-analyses have examined the effects of IS on patient outcomes, there is no clear evidence establishing its benefit to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. Clinical practice guidelines advise against the routine use of IS in postoperative care. Until evidence of benefit from well-designed clinical trials becomes available, the routine use of IS in postoperative care is not supported by high levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases/prevention & control , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Spirometry/methods , Humans , Postoperative Care/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Spirometry/instrumentation , Spirometry/standards
2.
Anesth Analg ; 123(1): 123-8, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27159073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a well-established method that can exclude pneumothorax by demonstration of pleural sliding and the associated ultrasound artifacts. The positive diagnosis of pneumothorax is more difficult to obtain and relies on detection of the edge of a pneumothorax, called the "lung point." Yet, anesthesiologists are not widely taught these techniques, even though their patients are susceptible to pneumothorax either through trauma or as a result of central line placement or regional anesthesia techniques performed near the thorax. In anticipation of an increased training demand for LUS, efficient and scalable teaching methods should be developed. In this study, we compared the improvement in LUS skills after either Web-based or classroom-based training. We hypothesized that Web-based training would not be inferior to "traditional" classroom-based training beyond a noninferiority limit of 10% and that both would be superior to no training. Furthermore, we hypothesized that this short training session would lead to LUS skills that are similar to those of ultrasound-trained emergency medicine (EM) physicians. METHODS: After a pretest, anesthesiologists from 4 academic teaching hospitals were randomized to Web-based (group Web), classroom-based (group class), or no training (group control) and then completed a posttest. Groups Web and class returned for a retention test 4 weeks later. All 3 tests were similar, testing both practical and theoretical knowledge. EM physicians (group EM) performed the pretest only. Teaching for group class consisted of a standardized PowerPoint lecture conforming to the Consensus Conference on LUS followed by hands-on training. Group Web received a narrated video of the same PowerPoint presentation, followed by an online demonstration of LUS that also instructs the viewer to perform an LUS on himself using a clinically available ultrasound machine and submit smartphone snapshots of the resulting images as part of a portfolio system. Group Web received no other hands-on training. RESULTS: Groups Web, class, control, and EM contained 59, 59, 20, and 42 subjects. After training, overall test results of groups Web and class improved by a mean of 42.9% (±18.1% SD) and 39.2% (±19.2% SD), whereas the score of group control did not improve significantly. The test improvement of group Web was not inferior to group class. The posttest scores of groups Web and class were not significantly different from group EM. In comparison with the posttests, the retention test scores did not change significantly in either group. CONCLUSIONS: When training anesthesiologists to perform LUS for the exclusion of pneumothorax, we found that Web-based training was not inferior to traditional classroom-based training and was effective, leading to test scores that were similar to a group of clinicians experienced in LUS.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiologists/education , Anesthesiology/education , Computer-Assisted Instruction , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Video Recording , Adult , Aged , Austria , Boston , Clinical Competence , Germany , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Task Performance and Analysis
3.
Anesth Analg ; 116(2): 399-405, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23302971

ABSTRACT

Although numerous studies have addressed the relationship between intrapartum neuraxial analgesia, particularly epidural fentanyl, and breastfeeding, substantial study design limitations have precluded the current literature from furnishing strong, clinically significant conclusions. Lack of randomized controlled trials, nonstandardization of breastfeeding evaluations across studies, and failure to control for confounding variables all pose significant problems. Further research is needed to elucidate the specific relationship between neuraxial opioids and breastfeeding and, if there are significant associations, whether these drugs act directly on neonatal brain tissue to attenuate exhibition of breastfeeding behaviors. In this review, I will detail the deficiencies of the current literature and make recommendations for future research.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Analgesia, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Body Mass Index , Body Temperature/drug effects , Body Temperature/physiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Oxytocics/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Social Support , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...