ABSTRACT
The breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP or ABCG2) involved in cancer multidrug resistance (MDR), transports many hydrophobic compounds, including a number of anti-cancer drugs. Our comprehensive study using a mouse model reveals that a subcutaneously growing tumor strongly affects the expression of BCRP in the host's normal organs on both the transcriptional and translational level. Additionally, the efflux of BCRP substrates is markedly enhanced. The levels of BCRP and its transcript in normal tissues distant from the tumor site correlate with tumor growth and the levels of cytokines in the peripheral blood. Thus, oncogenic stress causes transient systemic upregulation of BCRP in the host's normal tissues and organs, which is possibly mediated via cytokines. Because BCRP upregulation takes place in many organs as early as the initial stages of tumor development, it reveals a most basic mechanism that may be responsible for the induction of primary MDR. We hypothesize that such effects are not tumor-specific responses, but rather constitute a more universal defense strategy. The xenobiotic transporters are systemically mobilized due to various stresses, seemingly in a pre-emptive manner so that the body can be quickly and efficiently detoxified. Our findings shed new light on the biology of cancer and on the complexity of cancer-host interactions and are highly relevant to cancer therapies as well as to the design of new generations of therapeutics and personalized medicine.
ABSTRACT
The xenobiotic transporters are among the most important constituents of detoxification system in living organisms. Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) is one of the major transporters involved in the efflux of xenobiotics. To understand its role in chemotherapeutic and multidrug resistance, it is crucial to establish the determinants of its substrate specificity, which obviously is of high relevance for successful therapy of many diseases. This article summarizes the current knowledge about the substrate preferences of BCRP. We overview the factors which determine its activity, inhibition and substrate recognition, focusing on the structural features of the transporter. BCRP substrate specificity is quite low as it interacts with a spectrum of substances with only a few common features: hydrophobic and aromatic regions, possibly a flat conformation and the metal ion-, oxygen- and nitrogen-containing functionalities, most of which may be the donors/acceptors of H-bonds. Several amino acid residues and structural motifs are responsible for BCRP activity and substrate recognition. Thus, the active form of BCRP, at least a dimer or a larger oligomer is maintained by intramolecular disulfide bridge that involves Cys(603) residues. The GXXXG motif in transmembrane helix 1, Cys residues, Arg(482) and Lys(86) are responsible for maintaining the protein structure, which confers transport activity, and the His(457) or Arg(456) residues are directly involved in substrate binding. Arg(482) does not directly bind substrates, but electrostatically interacts with charged molecules, which initiates the conformational changes that transmit the signal from the transmembrane regions to the ABC domain.
