Left ventricular extracellular volume fraction and atrioventricular interaction in hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: Left atrial enlargement (LAE) predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Impaired LA function also confers poor prognosis. This study aimed to determine whether left ventricular (LV) interstitial fibrosis is associated with LAE and LA impairment in systemic hypertension. METHODS: Following informed written consent, a prospective observational study of 86 hypertensive patients (49 ± 15 years, 53% male, office SBP 168 ± 30 mmHg, office DBP 97 ± 4 mmHg) and 20 normotensive controls (48 ± 13 years, 55% male, office SBP 130 ± 13 mmHg, office DBP 80 ± 11 mmHg) at 1.5-T cardiovascular magnetic resonance was conducted. Extracellular volume fraction (ECV) was calculated by T1-mapping. LA volume (LAV) was measured with biplane area-length method. LA reservoir, conduit and pump function were calculated with the phasic volumetric method. RESULTS: Indexed LAV correlated with indexed LV mass (R = 0.376, p < 0.0001) and ECV (R = 0.359, p = 0.001). However, ECV was the strongest significant predictor of LAE in multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio [95th confidence interval] 1.24 [1.04-1.48], p = 0.017). Indexed myocardial interstitial volume was associated with significant reductions in LA reservoir (R = -0.437, p < 0.0001) and conduit (R = -0.316, p = 0.003) but not pump (R = -0.167, p = 0.125) function. Multiple linear regression, correcting for age, gender, BMI, BP and diabetes, showed an independent decrease of 3.5% LA total emptying fraction for each 10 ml/m2 increase in myocardial interstitial volume (standard ß coefficient -3.54, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: LV extracellular expansion is associated with LAE and impaired LA reservoir and conduit function. Future studies should identify if targeting diffuse LV fibrosis is beneficial in reverse remodelling of LA structural and functional pathological abnormalities in hypertension. KEY POINTS: • Left atrial enlargement (LAE) and impairment are markers of adverse prognosis in systemic hypertension but their pathophysiology is poorly understood. • Left ventricular extracellular volume fraction was the strongest independent multivariate predictor of LAE and was associated with impaired left atrial reservoir and conduit function. • LV interstitial expansion may play a central role in the pathophysiology of adverse atrioventricular interaction in systemic hypertension.

ECG strain pattern in hypertension is associated with myocardial cellular expansion and diffuse interstitial fibrosis: a multi-parametric cardiac magnetic resonance study.

AIMS: In hypertension, the presence of left ventricular (LV) strain pattern on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) carries adverse cardiovascular prognosis. The underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. We investigated whether hypertensive ECG strain is associated with myocardial interstitial fibrosis and impaired myocardial strain, assessed by multi-parametric cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 100 hypertensive patients [50 ± 14 years, male: 58%, office systolic blood pressure (SBP): 170 ± 30 mmHg, office diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 97 ± 14 mmHg) underwent ECG and 1.5T CMR and were compared with 25 normotensive controls (46 ± 14 years, 60% male, SBP: 124 ± 8 mmHg, DBP: 76 ± 7 mmHg). Native T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) were calculated with the modified look-locker inversion-recovery sequence. Myocardial strain values were estimated with voxel-tracking software. ECG strain (n = 20) was associated with significantly higher indexed LV mass (LVM) (119 ± 32 vs. 80 ± 17 g/m2, P < 0.05) and ECV (30 ± 4 vs. 27 ± 3%, P < 0.05) compared with hypertensive subjects without ECG strain (n = 80). ECG strain subjects had significantly impaired circumferential strain compared with hypertensive subjects without ECG strain and controls (-15.2 ± 4.7 vs. -17.0 ± 3.3 vs. -17.3 ± 2.4%, P < 0.05, respectively). In subgroup analysis, comparing ECG strain subjects to hypertensive subjects with elevated LVM but no ECG strain, a significantly higher ECV (30 ± 4 vs. 28 ± 3%, P < 0.05) was still observed. Indexed LVM was the only variable independently associated with ECG strain in multivariate logistic regression analysis [odds ratio (95th confidence interval): 1.07 (1.02-1.12), P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In hypertension, ECG strain is a marker of advanced LVH associated with increased interstitial fibrosis and associated with significant myocardial circumferential strain impairment.

Comprehensive characterisation of hypertensive heart disease left ventricular phenotypes.

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial intracellular/extracellular structure and aortic function were assessed among hypertensive left ventricular (LV) phenotypes using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: An observational study from consecutive tertiary hypertension clinic patients referred for CMR (1.5 T) was performed. Four LV phenotypes were defined: (1) normal with normal indexed LV mass (LVM) and LVM to volume ratio (M/V), (2) concentric remodelling with normal LVM but elevated M/V, (3) concentric LV hypertrophy (LVH) with elevated LVM but normal indexed end-diastolic volume (EDV) or (4) eccentric LVH with elevated LVM and EDV. Extracellular volume fraction was measured using T1-mapping. Circumferential strain was calculated by voxel-tracking. Aortic distensibility was derived from high-resolution aortic cines and contemporaneous blood pressure measurements. RESULTS: 88 hypertensive patients (49±14 years, 57% men, systolic blood pressure (SBP): 167±30 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 96±14 mm Hg) were compared with 29 age-matched/sex-matched controls (47±14 years, 59% men, SBP: 128±12 mm Hg, DBP: 79±10 mm Hg). LVH resulted from increased myocardial cell volume (eccentric LVH: 78±19 mL/m(2) vs concentric LVH: 73±15 mL/m(2) vs concentric remodelling: 55±9 mL/m(2), p<0.05, respectively) and interstitial fibrosis (eccentric LVH: 33±10 mL/m(2) vs concentric LVH: 30±10 mL/m(2) vs concentricremodelling: 19±2 mL/m(2), p<0.05, respectively). LVH had worst circumferential impairment (eccentric LVH: -12.8±4.6% vs concentric LVH: -15.5±3.1% vs concentric remodelling: -17.1±3.2%, p<0.05, respectively). Concentric remodelling was associated with reduced aortic distensibility, but not with large intracellular/interstitial expansion or myocardial dysfunction versus controls. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial interstitial fibrosis varies across hypertensive LV phenotypes with functional consequences. Eccentric LVH has the most fibrosis and systolic impairment. Concentric remodelling is only associated with abnormal aortic function. Understanding these differences may help tailor future antihypertensive treatments.