Are Proud Tibial Cone Constructs an Effective Alternative to Those That are Fully Seated in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between patients treated with the traditional fully seated tibial cone construct and those with the novel proud tibial cone construct in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 56 adult patients who had a minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent rTKA with either the fully seated (n = 18 knees) or proud (n = 42 knees) tibial cone construct between 2010 and 2020. The electronic medical record was reviewed for demographic, clinical, and radiographic data. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were collected. RESULTS: All patients had improved mechanical alignment postoperatively regardless of surgical technique. All patients showed good evidence of osseointegration without loss of fixation at the latest follow-up. There were no significant differences in the complication rate or re-revision rate between the groups. KOOS Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) scores were significantly higher for patients treated with the fully seated construct (mean 57 [range, 20 to 95] versus 38 [range, 0 to 75], P = .04); however, no significant differences were present for the other KOOS subscales or KOOS Jr. CONCLUSION: The proud tibial cone construct may be an effective alternative to the fully seated construct in the setting of severe bone loss in rTKA. The proud construct avoids a proximal tibial cut, and thus is a bone-preserving technique that provides good fixation, reduces operative time, prevents potential iatrogenic injuries, decreases the need for tibial augments, saves costs, and improves the ease of restoring joint height.

Meta-analysis of overall survival and postoperative neurologic deficits after resection or biopsy of butterfly glioblastoma.

Butterfly glioblastoma (bGBM) is a grade 4 glioma with a poor prognosis. Surgical treatment of these cancers has been reviewed in the literature with some recent studies supporting resection as a safe and effective treatment instead of biopsy and adjuvant therapy. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether there are significant differences in overall survival (OS) and postoperative neurologic deficits (motor, speech, and cranial nerve) following intervention in patients who underwent tumor resection as part of their treatment, compared to patients who underwent biopsy without surgical resection. A literature search was conducted using PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Embase (Elsevier) to identify articles from each database's earliest records to May 25, 2021, that directly compared the outcomes of biopsy and resection in bGBM patients and met predetermined inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of the two management strategies on OS and postoperative neurologic deficits. Six articles met our study inclusion criteria. OS was found to be significantly longer for the resection group at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.05) and 12 months (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.10-12.76) than for the biopsy group. No statistically significant differences were found in OS at 18 and 24 months. Resection was associated with an increased rate of postoperative neurologic deficit (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.02-4.09). Resection offers greater OS up to 1 year postintervention than biopsy alone; however, this comes at the cost of higher rates of postoperative neurologic deficits.

High flow or low flow? An unusual case of ischemic priapism following gunshot wound to the cervical spinal cord.

Ischemic priapism has rarely been reported in the setting of acute spinal cord injury. Herein, we present a 25 year-old male with cavernous blood gas evidence of ischemic priapism following a traumatic gunshot wound with a retained bullet fragment in the third cervical vertebra. The patient received definitive treatment with corporal aspiration and irrigation, with no evidence of priapism recurrence. This unusual case emphasizes the critical importance of obtaining a cavernous blood gas, even when a common cause of non-ischemic priapism is apparent. Suspicion for ischemic priapism must be maintained, especially in the setting of multiple known risk factors.