Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
Clin Genet ; 93(5): 972-981, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29318577

ABSTRACT

The latest United Kingdom (UK) strategy for rare diseases emphasises the need to empower affected populations to improve diagnosis, intervention, and coordination of care. Families who have a child with a rare chromosome disorder (RCD) are a challenging group to include. We report the findings of 2 large-scale surveys, undertaken by the UK RCD Support Group Unique, of these families' experiences over a 10-year period. Seven stages of the patient journey were examined. From pre-testing, through diagnosis, genetics consultation, clinical follow-up and peer support. Overall, 1158 families replied; 36.4% response rate (2003) and 53.6% (2013). Analysis of responses identifies significant differences (P < .001) over time with a decrease in results reported face to face (76%-62%), doubling by telephone (12%-22%), improved explanation of chromosome disorder (57%-75%), and increased signposting to peer support group (34%-62%). However, conduct of the consultation raises a number of important questions. Overall, 28 aspects of the patient journey are recognised as requiring improvement; only 12/28 are currently incorporated in UK service specifications. Involvement of RCD families has identified key service improvements. This approach can empower those affected by such extremely rare disorders, and also enable professionals to design improved services in partnership with "expert families." Further surveys are planned.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Disorders/epidemiology , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Rare Diseases/epidemiology , Chromosome Disorders/genetics , Chromosome Disorders/pathology , Chromosome Disorders/psychology , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Rare Diseases/genetics , Rare Diseases/pathology , Rare Diseases/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom/epidemiology
2.
Radiography (Lond) ; 23(2): 171-176, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28390551

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A systematic scoping review was undertaken to establish the evidence base on arbitration and consensus in mammography reporting. Database searches were supplemented with hand searching of peer-reviewed journals, citation tracking, key author searching, grey literature and personal contact with experts. A 3-stage process was utilised to screen a large volume of literature (601) against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 26 papers were retained. KEY FINDINGS: A lack of guidance and underpinning evidence to inform how best to use arbitration or consensus to resolve discordant reads. In particular, a lack of prospective studies to determine effectiveness in real-life clinical settings. CONCLUSION: The insufficiency of follow-up or reporting of true interval cancers compromised the ability to conclude the effectiveness of the processes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Consensus , Mass Screening , Negotiating , Female , Humans
3.
Health Technol Assess ; 14(41): 1-253, iii-iv, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20807469

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the clinical effectiveness of active management (AM) in general practice versus AM plus a group-based, professionally led cognitive behavioural approach (CBA) for subacute and chronic low back pain (LBP) and to measure the cost of each strategy over a period of 12 months and estimate cost-effectiveness. DESIGN: Pragmatic multicentred randomised controlled trial with investigator-blinded assessment of outcomes. SETTING: Fifty-six general practices from seven English regions. PARTICIPANTS: People with subacute and chronic LBP who were experiencing symptoms that were at least moderately troublesome. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised (in a ratio of 2:1) to receive either AM+CBA or AM alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) and the Modified Von Korff Scale (MVK), which measure LBP and disability. Secondary outcomes included mental and physical health-related quality of life (Short Form 12-item health survey), health status, fear avoidance beliefs and pain self-efficacy. Cost-utility of CBA was considered from both the UK NHS perspective and a broader health-care perspective, including both NHS costs and costs of privately purchased goods and services related to LBP. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated from the five-item EuroQoL. RESULTS: Between April 2005 and April 2007, 701 participants were randomised: 233 to AM and 468 to AM+CBA. Of these, 420 were female. The mean age of participants was 54 years and mean baseline RMQ was 8.7. Outcome data were obtained for 85% of participants at 12 months. Benefits were seen across a range of outcome measures in favour of CBA with no evidence of group or therapist effects. CBA resulted in at least twice as much improvement as AM. Mean additional improvement in the CBA arm was 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 1.7], 1.4 (95% CI 0.7 to 2.1) and 1.3 (95% CI 0.6 to 2.1) change points in the RMQ at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. Additional improvement in MVK pain was 6.8 (95% CI 3.5 to 10.2), 8.0 (95% CI 4.3 to 11.7) and 7.0 (95% CI 3.2 to 10.7) points, and in MVK disability was 4.3 (95% CI 0.4 to 8.2), 8.1 (95% CI 4.1 to 12.0) and 8.4 (95% CI 4.4 to 12.4) points at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. At 12 months, 60% of the AM+CBA arm and 31% of the AM arm reported some or complete recovery. Mean cost of attending a CBA course was 187 pounds per participant with an additional benefit in QALYs of 0.099 and an additional cost of 178.06 pounds. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 1786.00 pounds. Probability of CBA being cost-effective reached 90% at about 3000 pounds and remained at that level or above; at a cost-effectiveness threshold of 20,000 pounds the CBA group had an almost 100% probability of being considered cost-effective. User perspectives on the acceptability of group treatments were sought through semi-structured interviews. Most were familiar with key messages of AM; most who had attended any group sessions had retained key messages from the sessions and two-thirds talked about a reduction in fear avoidance and changes in their behaviour. Group sessions appeared to provide reassurance, lessen isolation and enable participants to learn strategies from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CBA in treating subacute and chronic LBP was shown, making this intervention attractive to patients, clinicians and purchasers. Short-term (3-month) clinical effects were similar to those found in high-quality studies of other therapies and benefits were maintained and increased over the long term (12 months). Cost per QALY was about half that of competing interventions for LBP and because the intervention can be delivered by existing NHS staff following brief training, the back skills training programme could be implemented within the NHS with relative ease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN37807450. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Low Back Pain/therapy , Primary Health Care/methods , Confidence Intervals , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Status Indicators , Health Surveys , Humans , Low Back Pain/economics , Low Back Pain/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Single-Blind Method , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
4.
Health Technol Assess ; 13(13): iii, ix-x, 1-121, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19232157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three methods of ankle support compared with double layer tubular compression bandage. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial, designed to reflect practice in UK hospital emergency departments. SETTING: Eight emergency departments in England. PARTICIPANTS: Aged 16 or over with acute severe ankle sprain, unable to weight bear, no fracture. INTERVENTIONS: 584 participants were randomised to one of four treatment arms: tubular bandage, below knee cast, Aircast ankle brace or Bledsoe boot, all applied 2-3 days after presentation to allow swelling to resolve. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to treatment was assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and generic measures (Functional Limitations Profile, SF-12 and EQ-5D). RESULTS: When adjusted for age, sex and baseline scores, the below knee cast offered a small but statistically significant benefit at 4 weeks in terms of pain (FAOS pain difference 5.1; 95% CI 0.4-9.8), foot- and ankle-related quality of life (QoL) (FAOS QoL difference 5.9; 95% CI 0.1-11.8) and the physical component of the SF-12 (SF-12 score difference 2.2; 95% CI 0.0-4.4). Neither the Aircast brace nor the Bledsoe boot was statistically or clinically better. At 12 weeks the below knee cast was significantly better than tubular bandage in terms of pain (FAOS pain difference 5.1; 95% CI 0.3-10.0), activities of daily living (FAOS ADL difference 3.5; 95% CI 0.4-6.6), sports (FAOS sports difference 8.7; 95% CI 1.6-15.7) and QoL (FAOS QoL difference 8.7; 95% CI 2.4-15.0), and the Aircast brace was better only in terms of ankle-related QoL and mental health. The Bledsoe boot conferred no significant advantage over tubular bandage. By 9 months there were no significant differences. Based on mean direct health-care costs per participant, the Bledsoe boot was the most expensive (215 pounds) and tubular bandage the least so (1 pound 44 pence). Inclusion of indirect costs (sick leave) raised overall costs substantially and removed any significant differences between the therapies. Cost-utility analysis demonstrated that the Aircast brace [301 pounds per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)] and below knee cast (339 pounds per QALY) were more cost-effective than the Bledsoe boot (2116 pounds per QALY). However, inclusion of indirect costs produced different rank orders, depending on the assumptions made, and results should be treated with caution. CONCLUSIONS: The below knee cast and the Aircast brace offered cost-effective alternatives to tubular bandage for acute severe ankle sprain, the former having the advantage in terms of overall recovery at 3 months. As there were no differences in long-term outcome, practitioners should consider likely compliance and acceptability to patients when choosing a brace.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/therapy , Bandages/economics , Braces/economics , Casts, Surgical/economics , Restraint, Physical/instrumentation , Sprains and Strains/therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Ankle Injuries/economics , Ankle Injuries/physiopathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Physical Therapy Modalities/economics , Recovery of Function , Restraint, Physical/methods , Sprains and Strains/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Lancet ; 371(9626): 1769-76, 2008 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18502301

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delivery of high-quality, evidence-based health care to deprived sectors of the community is a major goal for society. We investigated the effectiveness of a culturally sensitive, enhanced care package in UK general practices for improvement of cardiovascular risk factors in patients of south Asian origin with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this cluster randomised controlled trial, 21 inner-city practices in the UK were assigned by simple randomisation to intervention (enhanced care including additional time with practice nurse and support from a link worker and diabetes-specialist nurse [nine practices; n=868]) or control (standard care [12 practices; n=618]) groups. All adult patients of south Asian origin with type 2 diabetes were eligible. Prescribing algorithms with clearly defined targets were provided for all practices. Primary outcomes were changes in blood pressure, total cholesterol, and glycaemic control (haemoglobin A1c) after 2 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN 38297969. FINDINGS: We recorded significant differences between treatment groups in diastolic blood pressure (1.91 [95% CI -2.88 to -0.94] mm Hg, p=0.0001) and mean arterial pressure (1.36 [-2.49 to -0.23] mm Hg, p=0.0180), after adjustment for confounders and clustering. We noted no significant differences between groups for total cholesterol (0.03 [-0.04 to 0.11] mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (-0.33 [-2.41 to 1.75] mm Hg), or HbA1c (-0.15% [-0.33 to 0.03]). Economic analysis suggests that the nurse-led intervention was not cost effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio pound28 933 per QALY gained). Across the whole study population over the 2 years of the trial, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and cholesterol decreased significantly by 4.9 (95% CI 4.0-5.9) mm Hg, 3.8 (3.2-4.4) mm Hg, and 0.45 (0.40-0.51) mmol/L, respectively, and we recorded a small and non-significant increase for haemoglobin A1c (0.04% [-0.04 to 0.13]), p=0.290). INTERPRETATION: We recorded additional, although small, benefits from our culturally tailored care package that were greater than the secular changes achieved in the UK in recent years. Stricter targets in general practice and further measures to motivate patients are needed to achieve best possible health-care outcomes in south Asian patients with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Asia, Southeastern/ethnology , Cluster Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/ethnology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
Health Technol Assess ; 10(10): 1-176, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16595079

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate selected molecular tests in diagnosis and screening of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunosuppressed patients. DESIGN: Clinical and cost-effectiveness were assessed through a prospective two-stage trial of CMV screening regimes in a routine service setting. Different molecular test results were fed back to clinicians in each stage, plus antigenaemia results. The technical performance of the molecular methods was assessed through an independent masked comparison of each molecular test against the established (antigenaemia) test. Scientists performing a particular test were blind to the other test results for that sample. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact were recorded prospectively for all tests, to include any effect on diagnostic certainty, changes to CMV therapy and any other reported impact on patient management. The cost of each test was estimated under different laboratory conditions. Prospective patients undergoing CMV screening were compared with consecutive historical controls in the same unit. Towards the end of the study, a survey of all UK virology laboratories was undertaken to identify current CMV screening practice and test preferences. In addition, all UK renal transplant surgeons and haematology transplant centres were surveyed in order to identify current clinical practice and perceptions of the benefits of CMV screening. SETTING: Study patients were recruited from University Hospital Wales (UHW), Cardiff. Staff in the Cardiff Public Health Laboratory Service virology laboratory performed the tests. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of transplant patients was recruited to the prospective study over a 42-month period, totalling 98 renal and 140 haematology patients. A consecutive series of historical controls was identified, with 199 renal and 136 haematology patients who underwent transplants in the UHW during the 29 months prior to the prospective CMV screening trial. INTERVENTIONS: A predefined CMV screening protocol was applied to all patients in the prospective trial. Renal patients were tested every 4 weeks until 16 weeks post-transplant (five tests in total). Haematology patients were tested every 2 weeks until 12 weeks post-transplant, and then every 4 weeks until 24 weeks (10 tests in total). The assays used for CMV screening were as follows: non-molecular test, (1) pp65 antigenaemia assay; molecular tests, semi-quantitative in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR), (2) single-round (PCR1) and (3) two-round, nested (PCR2); and qualitative commercial tests, (4) Roche Amplicor Assay (Amplicor) and (5) pp67 NASBA assay (NASBA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test failure rates, sensitivity/specificity values and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were measured for each assay. The laboratory cost of undertaking various CMV tests was measured and other NHS costs associated with false-positive or false-negative test results were estimated. The likelihood of CMV disease and the likely impact of positive or negative test result on therapy and further investigations were recorded. On receipt of the test result, interim outcome measures were recorded to include the impact of test result on diagnostic certainty, changes to planned patient management (e.g. therapy, investigations) and perceived benefit. All definitive diagnoses of CMV disease, prescribing of CMV therapy and interim patient outcome at the end of the screening period were recorded. RESULTS: In haematology and renal transplant patients, all tests had a similar NPV (0.976--0.997 and 0.935--0.995, respectively) when used in CMV screening. PCR1 is the least expensive molecular test (7.80-13.70 UK pounds). Commercial tests, NASBA and Amplicor, are both more expensive (22.50-34.70 UK pounds NASBA; 23.20-29.20 UK pounds Amplicor). Antigenaemia costs 12.50-27.40 pounds depending on staff grade and batch size. Quantitative PCR (COBAS) is the most expensive at around 50 UK pounds per sample. No clear link between screening test results and CMV prescribing was detected; clinicians appear to consider screening results in the context of other factors. There was no evidence that the introduction of CMV screening led to reductions in CMV deaths or improved transplant success rates. For cost per positive test result, PCR1 was the most cost-effective screening test on this indicator (renal patients 116 UK pounds per true positive, haematology patients 518 pounds). Antigenaemia was the least cost-effective screening test (renal patients 643 UK pounds per true positive, haematology patients 2475 pounds). Cost-effectiveness analysis and cost per "beneficial result" (as judged by clinicians) confirmed that PCR1 remained the most cost-effective test. Modelling outputs for targeted screening protocols also supported this. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings offer some evidence that a CMV screening regime is more cost-effective than diagnostic testing alone, based on the cost per true positive detected and interim outcome such as changes in patient management. However, the study was unable to demonstrate any benefits in terms of longer term patient outcomes. If CMV screening is introduced, the use of antigenaemia pp65 is clearly less cost-effective than the use of molecular tests. The study identified the optimum test for CMV screening as an in-house molecular test (single-round PCR test). This test was less costly to perform and also resulted in lower costs linked to false positives and negatives than other tests. The in-house, semi-quantitative test was two to three times more cost-effective than the commercial molecular tests assessed; however changes to European Union legislation may mean that it may not be feasible to use in-house tests. The use of targeted screening (limiting CMV screening to high-risk transplants) as opposed to universal screening offers a significant improvement in the cost-effectiveness ratio for haematology transplant patients, but has limited impact in the case of renal transplants. Economic analyses could be expanded to model the cost-effectiveness of more frequent screening tests (as reported nationally), and screening in other "at risk" groups. Subgroup specific disease groups should be investigated across a larger population to allow more accurate modelling of the impact of CMV screening on disease progression. Further studies of CMV screening programmes should address a range of outcome measures, including patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/economics , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Immunocompromised Host , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/economics , Data Collection , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom
7.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 6: 1, 2005 Jan 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15777484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal management for severe sprains (Grades II and III) of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle is unclear. The aims of this randomised controlled trial are to estimate (1) the clinical effectiveness of three methods of providing mechanical support to the ankle (below knee cast, Aircast brace and Bledsoe boot) in comparison to Tubigrip, and (2) to compare the cost of each strategy, including subsequent health care costs. METHODS/DESIGN: Six hundred and fifty people with a diagnosis of severe sprain are being identified through emergency departments. The study has been designed to complement routine practice in the emergency setting. Outcomes are recovery of mobility (primary outcome) and usual activity, residual symptoms and need for further medical, rehabilitation or surgical treatment. Parallel economic and qualitative studies are being conducted to aid interpretation of the results and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. DISCUSSION: This paper highlights the design, methods and operational aspects of a clinical trial of acute injury management in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Care Costs , Orthotic Devices/economics , Research Design , Sprains and Strains/therapy , Humans , Treatment Outcome
8.
Postgrad Med J ; 81(953): 141-7, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15749788

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the research evidence on access to health care by ethnic minority populations, and discusses what might need to be done to improve access to services. Research on the process of care, and the quality of care received, is considered as well as studies examining uptake of services. Changes in legal context are increasing the pressure on healthcare organisations to examine and adapt their services to ensure equitable access. Examples presented include a new UK population cancer screening programme. The main challenges for clinicians, managers, and policy makers in ensuring equitable access are discussed.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Ethnicity , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Minority Groups , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Neoplasms/diagnosis , State Medicine/standards , United Kingdom
9.
Diabet Med ; 21(12): 1357-65, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15569141

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We tested the hypothesis that enhanced care for diabetes, tailored to the needs of the South Asian community with Type 2 diabetes, would improve risk factors for diabetic vascular complications and ultimately reduce morbidity and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with general practice the unit of randomization. Six West Midlands general practices with a high proportion of South Asian patients were randomized to 'enhanced care' using Asian link workers and extra community diabetes specialist nurse sessions (intervention) or continued standard practice care (control). RESULTS: Of 401 patients recruited to the study, 361 (90%), comprising 178 from Coventry and 183 from Birmingham were eligible and included in the analyses. The mean age at baseline (standard deviation, SD) was 58.9 (11.7 years) with median (interquartile range; IQR) duration of diabetes 6.5 (3-11) years. At one year follow-up there was a significant difference in reduction of systolic (4.6 mmHg, P = 0.035) and diastolic blood pressure (3.4 mmHg, P = 0.003) and total cholesterol (0.4 mmol/l, P = 0.005), comparing the intervention and control groups. After adjusting for baseline measurement and age, only differential reduction in diastolic blood pressure remained significant. There was no significant change in HbA(1c) and no difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using link workers and extra community diabetes specialist nurse input together with treatment protocols in primary care might prove a useful strategy in working towards NSF targets for diabetes management. In this study, small reductions in blood pressure and cholesterol were achieved. Improvement in glycaemic control may require longer and possibly different strategies. Further research is required to evaluate fully the effectiveness, including the costs and longer term sustainability of culturally sensitive initiatives.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/ethnology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Aged , Asia, Southeastern/ethnology , Blood Pressure , Community Health Nursing , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetic Retinopathy/prevention & control , Family Practice , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United Kingdom
11.
Eur Respir J ; 20(5): 1233-8, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12449179

ABSTRACT

Formulating a rational health policy necessitates the ability to compare between different healthcare interventions and disease scenarios. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy with a conservative lifestyle strategy in sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS) was evaluated using health utility and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as outcome measures. A total 71 SAHS (apnoea/hypopnoea index > or = 15 h(-1)) patients completed a randomised, parallel group study over 3 months using utilities derived by the standard gamble approach (Usg) and European quality of life questionnaire (Euroqol) (Ueq). The severely impaired health status at baseline improved by 23% (Usg 0.32 to 0.55) adding 8 QALYs in the CPAP group, compared to a 4% improvement with 4.7 QALYs added in the lifestyle group (Usg 0.31 to 0.35). The Ueq showed a marginal change with CPAP (0.73 to 0.77) but did not demonstrate any improvement with lifestyle intervention. The health status impairment in sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome patients is markedly improved by continuous positive airway pressure compared to a modest improvement with conservative lifestyle strategies using the standard gamble utility, which may be incorporated in effectiveness and economic analyses. The European quality of life questionnaire did not reflect a similar degree of impact and is probably not useful in this population.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Patient Education as Topic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Health Behavior , Humans , Life Style , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Quality of Life , Self Care , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis
12.
Health Policy ; 53(2): 91-104, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10958991

ABSTRACT

We were commissioned by the West Midlands NHS Regional Specialized Services Group (RSSG) to formulate a strategic plan for the management of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) within the West Midlands, UK. We needed to establish whether an increase in MRI provision was required, and if so to develop criteria to shape both the nature and location of MRI provision. We found that the UK had relatively low MRI provision per capita by international standards, and that the West Midlands region of the UK had less than the UK average level of MRI provision per capita. Within the region there was a 'mixed economy' of MRI provision involving fixed site scanners owned by the NHS and private companies, and private sector mobile MRI provision. There was little evidence of inappropriate MRI use, but considerable evidence of under-provision. Most MRI scanners in the region were heavily utilized, and average waiting times for MRI frequently exceeded guidelines (of a maximum 13-week wait for non-urgent MRI scans). Projections from NHS Trusts, MRI suppliers, and experts in the MRI field, led us to the conclusion that demand for MRI was likely to grow by between 12.5 and 18.5% per annum. This implies that 8-14 additional MRI scanners might be required within the West Midlands over the next 5 years, to meet existing, and rising demand for MRI. We therefore developed criteria (outlined in the paper) to enhance the productive and allocative efficiency of the deployment of MRI provision, whilst improving the configuration of MRI with reference to geographical equality of access to MRI.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Regional Health Planning/methods , Decision Making, Organizational , England , Hospital Costs , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Needs Assessment , Organizational Objectives , Planning Techniques , State Medicine , Waiting Lists
13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10537861

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN: To assess quality of a quick and early diagnosis route (QED) by determining effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of five clinics compared with three conventional outpatient clinics. Prospective economic evaluation. Six-month cohort of all referrals (November 1996-April 1997). SUBJECTS: All referrals for suspected cancers of: upper gastro-intestinal tract; urinary tract, prostate and testis; skin. EFFECTIVENESS: Median days saved between GP referral and date of: diagnostic appointment; consultant decision; intervention. RESULTS: GP referral to diagnostic appointment: QED was effective (median days) for all clinics. Diagnostic appointment to consultant decision: QED was effective for testicular and haematuria clinics. Consultant decision to intervention: QED was effective for haematuria, testicular and melanoma clinics. COST-EFFECTIVENESS: Extra (incremental) NHS cost per patient diagnosed. RESULTS: Less than 5 Pounds per day saved between GP referral and diagnostic appointment for: endoscopy; haematuria; prostate; testicular; melanoma. Less than 3 Pounds per day saved between GP referral and consultant decision for: testicular; haematuria. Less than 3 Pounds per day saved between GP referral and intervention for: endoscopy; haematuria; testicular; melanoma. CONCLUSION: A "quick and early" diagnostic route provides a higher quality service through improved effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional outpatients.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Oncology Service, Hospital/standards , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Referral and Consultation , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitals, University , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/standards , Oncology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Oncology Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/economics , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , State Medicine/organization & administration , State Medicine/standards , Time Factors , United Kingdom
14.
J Clin Pathol ; 49(11): 903-8, 1996 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8944609

ABSTRACT

AIM: To survey the use made of laboratory services for urgent tests and clinicians' attitudes to near patient testing. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to clinicians working in acute hospitals within Trent and North West Thames Regions. RESULTS: 197 replies were received. Most demand came from intensive care units. Overall, clinicians requested a median of six urgent tests a day. Blood glucose and dip stick urine testing were the most commonly performed bedside tests, but 41% of clinicians did not use ward testing. The most frequently cited indication for bedside testing was the need for speed. 85% of clinicians trusted results obtained in their central hospital laboratory, but there was an almost equal division between those who did (34%) and those who did not (38%) trust the results from near patient testing. A slightly larger proportion indicated they would accept responsibility (44%) for results obtained on the ward than would not (35%). Most staff indicated that better transport to the laboratory would remove the need for near patient testing. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have demonstrated an apparent need for rapid response testing but there is a strong preference for rapid transport systems and central laboratory analysis rather than bedside testing as a solution to this problem. There is a need to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of near patient testing as a solution to rapid response testing.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Laboratories, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Medical Staff, Hospital , Point-of-Care Systems/statistics & numerical data , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , England , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Time Factors
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10162123

ABSTRACT

Since 1990, the changes introduced in UK general practice, such as fund holding and national incentives, have altered the process of care. Audit, defined as "the systematic critical analysis of the quality of medical care, including the procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources, and the resulting outcome and quality of life for patients", is one method of monitoring change and raising standards. Presents a successful co-ordinated audit in Warwickshire, 1991-1993, involving 53 general practices. Highlights and influence of attitudes and communication within practices on the success of audit strategies. Associates aspects of practice culture, such as team working and decision-making processes with successful audit. Postulates six descriptive practice types, largely related to culture factors. Suggests that if cultural factors within practices are identified, external assistance with audit may be more focused and effective.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/standards , Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Interviews as Topic , State Medicine/standards , United Kingdom
16.
Br J Gen Pract ; 44(389): 577-80, 1994 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7748669

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of near patient testing in British general practice has largely been confined to studies examining individual tests or comparing equipment. AIM: This study set out to determine the attitudes of practice staff to near patient testing, and the extent to which staff undertook quality assessment. METHOD: Four types of near patient testing machines were introduced into 12 general practices in two regions of England, south west Thames and west Midlands. General practitioner and practice nurse attitudes to near patient testing were assessed by semi-structured interview before and six months after the introduction of the machines. The extent to which routine quality assurance procedures were carried out within the surgery and as part of local and national schemes was examined. RESULTS: Although 80% of general practitioners anticipated changing patient management with near patient testing, only two fifths reported having done so after six months. Nurses generally were enthusiastic at the outset, although one third were unhappy about incorporating near patient testing into their work schedules. Time pressure was the most important factor restricting uptake of near patient testing. Nurses performed quality control regularly but complete local external quality assurance procedures were established in only half the practices. All the practices participated in a national scheme for cholesterol assays. CONCLUSION: General practitioners in this study did not find near patient testing a very useful addition to their resources. Pressure on nurses' time was the most frequently reported limitation.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice , Humans , Nurse Practitioners , Quality Assurance, Health Care
18.
Soc Sci Med ; 38(12): 1679-88, 1994 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8047927

ABSTRACT

Between mid-1991 and mid-1992, nearly 300 different organisations involved in European health care contributed their views to a survey covering a range of topics relevant to health care technology assessment (HCTA) and economic appraisal of health technologies. Organisations who participated included manufacturers, health care institutions, professional associations, health care reimbursement or funding agencies, academic institutions and policy making agencies in eight European countries. The study was carried out as part of a larger project, COMETT-ASSESS, funded partially by the EC COMETT programme, to design and deliver training in health care technology assessment and socioeconomic evaluation. The survey demonstrates a high level of interest in assessment of health care technologies among European organisations, regardless of the type of organisation. Eight out of ten organisations report high-medium levels of interest in using HCTA in their decision making. A similar proportion report high-medium interest in increasing their general understanding of HCTA, and 2 out of 3 in carrying out assessments. All organisations clearly identify a need to train their staff in HCTA. The two key groups of staff requiring training are managers and clinicians. Manufacturers also report a need to train their marketing staff. The principal reason for training is in order to improve the use staff make of HCTA in their decision-making. This finding indicates that it may not be sufficient for European countries to develop effective HCTA dissemination strategies which improve the flow of information on technology assessment results; decision-makers within the organisations targeted will also need training, if they are to use this information effectively. As well as a need to train decision-makers, organisations also report a need to train their researchers, and to a lesser extent their own trainers. When it comes to the types of technologies which need to be assessed, organisations consistently report that they are interested in assessment of accepted health technologies, as well as new or recently introduced ones. In contrast, to date the major emphasis in many HCTA programmes has been on technologies which are yet to enter the service setting. More thought now needs to be given to developing methodologies for assessing technologies once they have reached the service setting. For this the presence of a skilled and well-trained group of health personnel will also be necessary.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Health Facility Administrators/education , Health Personnel/education , Research Personnel/education , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Data Collection , Decision Making, Organizational , Diffusion of Innovation , Economic Competition , Education, Continuing , Educational Measurement , Europe , Humans , Professional Competence
19.
Br J Gen Pract ; 44(378): 19-24, 1994 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8312032

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and relative cost of three forms of information feedback to general practices--graphical, graphical plus a visit by a medical facilitator and tabular. METHOD: Routinely collected, centrally-held data were used where possible, analysed at practice level. Some non-routine practice data in the form of risk factor recording in medical notes, for example weight, smoking status, alcohol consumption and blood pressure, were also provided to those who requested it. The 52 participating practices were stratified and randomly allocated to one of the three feedback groups. The cost of providing each type of feedback was determined. The immediate response of practitioners to the form of feedback (acceptability), ease of understanding (intelligibility), and usefulness of regular feedback was recorded. Changes introduced as a result of feedback were assessed by questionnaire shortly after feedback, and 12 months later. Changes at the practice level in selected indicators were also assessed 12 and 24 months after initial feedback. RESULTS: The resulting cost per effect was calculated to be 46.10 pounds for both graphical and tabular feedback, 132.50 pounds for graphical feedback plus facilitator visit and 773.00 pounds for the manual audit of risk factors recorded in the practice notes. The three forms of feedback did not differ in intelligibility or usefulness, but feedback plus a medical facilitator visit was significantly less acceptable. There was a high level of self-reported organizational change following feedback, with 69% of practices reporting changes as a direct result; this was not significantly different for the three types of feedback. There were no significant changes in the selected indicators at 12 or 24 months following feedback. The practice characteristic most closely related to better indicators of preventive practice was practice size, smaller practices performing significantly better. Separate clinics were not associated with better preventive practice. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that feedback strategies using graphical and tabular comparative data are equally cost-effective in general practice with about two thirds of practices reporting organizational change as a consequence; feedback involving unsolicited medical facilitator visits is less cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of manual risk factor audit is also called into question.


Subject(s)
Family Practice , Information Services , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England , Family Practice/economics , Feedback , Humans , Information Services/economics , Random Allocation
20.
BMJ ; 307(6907): 775-8, 1993 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8219952

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and economic impact of surgery based near patient testing in general practice for six commonly used biochemical and bacteriological tests. DESIGN: After four months' monitoring, equipment for two bacteriological and four biochemical tests was introduced without cost into 12 practices using a crossover design. Structured request forms were used to monitor laboratory investigations. SETTING: 12 general practices in west midlands and south west Thames with list sizes above 9000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Investigation rates per 1000 consultations. Changes from baseline rates. Reasons for requesting investigations and provisional diagnoses. Cost per test and sensitivity of costs to rate of use. RESULTS: Investigation rates for the six tests rose by 16.5% (from 78.6/1000 consultations to 91.6/1000) when equipment was available in the surgery and reverted to baseline rates when it was withdrawn. The average weekly number of tests when equipment was available ranged from 0.5 to 10.5 (mean 9.0). Cholesterol tests were used as an addition to laboratory testing, usually for screening. Midstream urine analysis was often done in the surgery instead of in the laboratory, although 30% of samples were tested by both methods. Doctors' reasons for investigation and conditions tested were largely unaffected by availability of surgery tests. Costs for surgery tests were higher for all tests except midstream urine. CONCLUSIONS: Availability of surgery based testing increased the number of tests performed. It was cost effective only for midstream urine analysis.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Cholesterol/blood , Clinical Enzyme Tests , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Making , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/economics , England , Female , Hematologic Tests , Humans , Urinalysis , Vaginal Smears
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...