Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther ; 45(4): 215-22, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24407899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Implantable venous access ports are essential for patients requiring chronic venous access. The aim of this study was to determine securities, risks of complications and patients' satisfaction with using a port system. METHODS: Between April 2008 and May 2013, 220 consecutive patients (mean age: 53 ± 12 years; 155 female) were enrolled into this observational, single-centre study. 65 patients who received a port system were asked to complete a questionnaire with the aim of evaluating the patient's satisfaction and quality of life. RESULTS: First vena subclavia and later internal jugular were the most frequently used for venous access. Among serious complications, three cases (1.5%) of pneumothorax were observed. Technical difficulties of cannulation were observed in 12 cases (5.6%). In the late period, functional complications, defined as 'easy injection, impossible aspiration' at port access, affected more than 25% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of vascular ports is a safe procedure, and serious complications are rare. In the evaluated group, complications connected with the complete functioning of ports were observed. Among responders, more than 90% of patients reported high overall satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/psychology , Catheters, Indwelling , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...