Assessment of clinical outcome after sudden alteration of home parenteral nutrition program from customised to commercially premixed admixtures. Experience with short bowel syndrome treatment.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Disruptions in the home parenteral nutrition (HPN) process may lead to failure to achieve the intended treatment purposes. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcome in a group of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) after a sudden change in the type of home parenteral nutrition programs from customized to commercially premixed admixtures. METHODS: The study conducted in 2020 identified 51 patients with SBS: 27 (53%) women and 24 (47%) men. The SBS were classified as SBS with end jejunostomy 23 (45%) patients, with jejuno-colon anastomosis 23 (45%) patients, with jejuno-ileo anastomosis and total colon in continuity 5 (10%) patients. The following therapeutic program-related data were analysed: changes in nutritional status, body mass index (BMI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, and biochemical assessment. For statistical analysis, the Wilcoxon rank-sum and signed-rank paired tests with continuity corrections were used to compare the results. A p-value of <0.001 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the analysed groups in total energy, amino acid concentrations, and intravenous volume supplementation. BMI and CONUT assessments of nutritional status and selected biochemical parameters were stable during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that a sudden change in the HPN therapy program from parenteral admixtures, tailored to meet individual patients' needs, to commercially premixed admixtures had no significant impact on the mid-term clinical condition of patients with SBS.

Complications of tunneled peripherally inserted and tunneled-cuffed central catheters in home parenteral nutrition.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare complications associated with tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters (tPICCs) and tunneled-cuffed centrally inserted central catheters (tCICCs) in adult home parenteral nutrition (HPN). METHODS: The study (2017-2019) identified 257 people with type III chronic intestinal failure requiring HPN. The data were analyzed for tPICC- and tCICC-related complications. The rate of catheter-related complications was recorded as the number of complications analyzed per 1000 d of catheter use, and rates were compared using the Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: A total of 273 venous access devices were included to the analyses: 150 (55%) non-cuffed tPICCs and 123 (45%) tCICCs. In-dwelling time for tPICCs and tCICCs were 23 045 and 43 789 catheter d, respectively. Median (interquartile range) catheter days and duration of HPN, for tPICCs and tCICCs, were respectively 119 (166) and 324 (314) d and 108 (159) and 324 (322) d. The overall complication rates per 1000 catheter d for tPICCs and tCICCs were 1.52 and 0.8, respectively (P = 0.565). On analysis, there was no statistical difference between complication rates per 1000 catheter d. The removal rate and conversion ratio due to complications were similar for tPICCs and tCICCs. CONCLUSIONS: Both tPICCs and tCICCs have similar complication rates per 1000 d. This study highlights that tCICCs, the preferred and currently used venous access devices in HPN, can be effectively and safely replaced by tPICCs, depending on the indications.

The role of artificial nutrition in gynecological cancer therapy.

Cancer patients are at risk of developing malnutrition from underlying disease as well as from cancer treatment. Moreover, weight loss is considered as a predictive factor for disease progression and shorter survival time. As many as 10-20% of patients with cancer die from the results of malnutrition, instead of from the cancer itself. In the case of cancer-related malnutrition, it is necessary to quickly implement individualized nutritional support depending on the type and stage of the disease, metabolic changes, the patient's condition, expected survival and the function of the gastrointestinal tract. Artificial nutrition reduces the side effects of chemotherapy and improves immunity. Perioperatively it reduces the risk of infection, facilitates wound healing and shortens the length of hospitalization, thereby reducing the costs of the treat- ment. Initially, a malnourished patient, without gastrointestinal dysfunction, qualifies for nutritional counseling. When the energy needs cannot be met by normal feeding, nutritional supplements, taken orally, are recommended. The next step is to feed the patient by nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Parenteral nutrition, which results in more side effects, is only started when enteral nutrition is insufficient to ensure adequate nutritional status or in cases of gastrointestinal tract obstruction. The benefit of parenteral nutrition is that it especially provides for those patients with gynaecological cancer who have radiation-induced intestinal damage and post-surgical complications such as short bowel syndrome. Palliative nutrition must to relieve hunger and thirst. Nutritional interventions should be individualized and focused on the changing nutrient needs of the patient and should be supported by physical activity. Regular assessment of the nutritional status of the patient should be an inherent element of the oncological treatment.