Distinctive subdomains in the resorbing surface of osteoclasts.

We employed a novel technique to inspect the substrate-apposed surface of activated osteoclasts, the cells that resorb bone, in the scanning electron microscope. The surface revealed unexpected complexity. At the periphery of the cells were circles and crescents of individual or confluent nodules. These corresponded to the podosomes and actin rings that form a 'sealing zone', encircling the resorptive hemivacuole into which protons and enzymes are secreted. Inside these rings and crescents the osteoclast surface was covered with strips and patches of membrane folds, which were flattened against the substrate surface and surrounded by fold-free membrane in which many orifices could be seen. Corresponding regions of folded and fold-free membrane were found by transmission electron microscopy in osteoclasts incubated on bone. We correlated these patterns with the distribution of several proteins crucial to resorption. The strips and patches of membrane folds corresponded in distribution to vacuolar H+-ATPase, and frequently co-localized with F-actin. Cathepsin K localized to F-actin-free foci towards the center of cells with circular actin rings, and at the retreating pole of cells with actin crescents. The chloride/proton antiporter ClC-7 formed a sharply-defined band immediately inside the actin ring, peripheral to vacuolar H+-ATPase. The sealing zone of osteoclasts is permeable to molecules with molecular mass up to 10,000. Therefore, ClC-7 might be distributed at the periphery of the resorptive hemivacuole in order to prevent protons from escaping laterally from the hemivacuole into the sealing zone, where they would dissolve the bone mineral. Since the activation of resorption is attributable to recognition of the αVß3 ligands bound to bone mineral, such leakage would, by dissolving bone mineral, release the ligands and so terminate resorption. Therefore, ClC-7 might serve not only to provide the counter-ions that enable proton pumping, but also to facilitate resorption by acting as a 'functional sealing zone'.

Bone is not essential for osteoclast activation.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism whereby bone activates resorptive behavior in osteoclasts, the cells that resorb bone, is unknown. It is known that α(v)ß(3) ligands are important, because blockade of α(v)ß(3) receptor signaling inhibits bone resorption, but this might be through inhibition of adhesion or migration rather than resorption itself. Nor is it known whether α(v)ß(3) ligands are sufficient for resorption the consensus is that bone mineral is essential for the recognition of bone as the substrate appropriate for resorption. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Vitronectin- but not fibronectin-coated coverslips induced murine osteoclasts to secrete tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, as they do on bone. Osteoclasts incubated on vitronectin, unlike fibronectin, formed podosome belts on glass coverslips, and these were modulated by resorption-regulating cytokines. Podosome belts formed on vitronectin-coated surfaces whether the substrates were rough or smooth, rigid or flexible. We developed a novel approach whereby the substrate-apposed surface of cells can be visualized in the scanning electron microscope. With this approach, supported by transmission electron microscopy, we found that osteoclasts on vitronectin-coated surfaces show ruffled borders and clear zones characteristic of resorbing osteoclasts. Ruffles were obscured by a film if cells were incubated in the cathepsin inhibitor E64, suggesting that removal of the film represents substrate-degrading behavior. Analogously, osteoclasts formed resorption-like trails on vitronectin-coated substrates. Like bone resorption, these trails were dependent upon resorbogenic cytokines and were inhibited by E64. Bone mineral induced actin rings and surface excavation only if first coated with vitronectin. Fibronectin could not substitute in any of these activities, despite enabling adhesion and cell spreading. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results show that ligands α(v)ß(3) are not only necessary but sufficient for the induction of resorptive behavior in osteoclasts; and suggest that bone is recognized through its affinity for these ligands, rather than by its mechanical or topographical attributes, or through a putative 'mineral receptor'.

The resorptive apparatus of osteoclasts supports lysosomotropism and increases potency of basic versus non-basic inhibitors of cathepsin K.

In mice and humans, the effect of genetic deficiency of cathepsin K (catK) is impaired bone resorption, or osteopetrosis. Inhibition of catK is therefore a promising strategy for the treatment of osteoporosis. The enzyme acts in an acid environment. This provides a further potential opportunity: if the inhibitor is basic it is more likely to accumulate in membrane-bound acidic compartments (lysosomotropism), so minimizing off-target effects. However, the resorptive hemivacuole is not membrane-bound, and so might not retain lysosomotropic compounds. We therefore elected to determine whether the osteoclastic resorptive apparatus supports such accumulation. First, we attempted to compare the persistence of a lysosomotropic dye in the hemivacuole versus intracellular vesicles. To our surprise the dye could not be detected in the ruffled border region by confocal microscopy. We found that this could be explained by the tight packing of the folds of the ruffled border, and their close apposition to the bone surface. We also found that the dye persisted similarly in resorbing osteoclasts and macrophages, consistent with the notion that resorbing osteoclasts support lysosomotropism. Next, we compared the ability of basic and non-basic inhibitors of catK to suppress bone resorption by human osteoclasts. We found that basic compounds were considerably more potent than non-basic compounds at suppression of osteoclastic resorption than would be anticipated from their potency as enzyme inhibitors. Also consistent with osteoclastic lysosomotropism, basic inhibitors suppressed resorption for substantially longer than a non-basic inhibitor after washout from cell cultures. Furthermore, selectivity of basic inhibitors for inhibition of catK versus other cathepsins persisted: concentrations that inhibited catK in osteoclasts had no detectable effect on cathepsin S (catS) in a cell-based assay. This data is consistent with accumulation and enrichment of such basic inhibitors in the resorptive apparatus of the osteoclast, allowing for prolonged efficacy at the intended site of action. Our results suggest a major advantage for lysosomotropic compounds as inhibitors of bone resorption by osteoclasts in osteoporosis and other diseases caused by excessive osteoclastic activity.