Regional and temporal variations of spontaneous coronary artery dissection care according to consensus recommendations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: The first expert consensus documents on management of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) were published in 2018. Worldwide quality of care, as measured by adherence to these recommendations, has not been systematically reviewed. We aim to review the proportion of patients with SCAD receiving consensus recommendations globally, regionally and, determine differences in practice before and after 2018. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review was performed by searching four main databases (Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, CINAHL) from their inception to 16 June 2022. Studies were selected if they included patients with SCAD and reported at least one of the consensus document recommendations. 53 studies, n=8456 patients (mean 50.1 years, 90.6% female) were included. On random effects meta-analysis, 92.1% (95% CI 89.3 to 94.8) received at least one antiplatelet, 78.0% (CI 73.5 to 82.4) received beta-blockers, 58.7% (CI 52.3 to 65.1) received ACE inhibitors or aldosterone receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs), 54.4% (CI 45.4 to 63.5) were screened for fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), and 70.2% (CI 60.8 to 79.5) were referred to cardiac rehabilitation. Except for cardiac rehabilitation referral and use of ACEIs/ARBs, there was significant heterogeneity in all other quality-of-care parameters, across geographical regions. No significant difference was observed in adherence to recommendations in studies published before and after 2018, except for lower cardiac rehabilitation referrals after 2018 (test of heterogeneity, p=0.012). CONCLUSION: There are significant variations globally in the management of patients with SCAD, particularly in FMD screening. Raising awareness about consensus recommendations and further prospective evidence about their effect on outcomes may help improve the quality of care for these patients.

Environmental Sustainability in the Cardiac Catheter Laboratory.

The health care sector contributes to nearly 5% of global carbon emissions with the exponential growth of medical waste posing a significant challenge to environmental sustainability. As the impact of climate change on individuals and population health becomes increasingly more apparent, the health care system's significant impact on the environment is also raising concerns. Hospitals contribute disproportionately to health care waste with the majority arising from resource intensive areas such as operating theatres and cardiac catheter labs (CCLs). Despite the growing volume of cardiac procedures worldwide, initiatives to reduce waste from CCLs have received limited attention, overlooking opportunities for significant reduction in operational costs and carbon footprint. We aim to raise awareness of the current landscape of waste management in CCLs. We identify areas of resource optimisation and highlight practical strategies and frameworks employed elsewhere in health care to reduce waste. Importantly, we hope to empower health care workers in CCLs to make a meaningful change to their practice and contribute towards a more sustainable future.

Nondominant Right Coronary Artery Occlusion: Small Vessel, Dramatic Sequelae.

Nondominant right coronary artery (NDRCA) occlusion is rare and generally affects a small volume of myocardium. Despite this, NDRCA occlusion can result in dramatic clinical sequelae. These cases demonstrate the characteristic electrocardiographic findings and consequences of NDRCA occlusion, highlighting the importance of recognition of this pathologic condition to institute appropriate management. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Contemporary Management of Isolated Ostial Side Branch Disease: An Evidence-based Approach to Medina 001 Bifurcations.

The optimal management of bifurcation lesions has received significant interest in recent years and remains a matter of debate among the interventional cardiology community. Bifurcation lesions are encountered in approximately 21% of percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and are associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. The Medina classification has been developed in an attempt to standardise the terminology when describing bifurcation lesions. The focus of this article is on the management of the Medina 0,0,1 lesion ('Medina 001'), an uncommon lesion encountered in <5% of all bifurcations. Technical considerations, management options and interventional techniques relating to the Medina 001 lesion are discussed. In addition, current published data supporting the various proposed interventional treatment strategies are examined in an attempt to delineate an evidence-based approach to this uncommon lesion.

Percutaneous closure of an iatrogenic right ventricular perforation with an angio-seal vascular closure device: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic perforation of the right ventricle (RV) is a rare but recognized complication of pericardiocentesis. Treatment strategies for RV perforation include surgical repair and percutaneous closure. In this case report, we describe the use of an angio-seal vascular closure device (Terumo Interventional Systems) to seal an iatrogenic RV perforation secondary to incorrect placement of a pericardial drain. CASE SUMMARY: A 55-year-old female presented with an anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography demonstrated occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. The patient went on to have primary percutaneous coronary intervention and both the left anterior descending and D1 were wired. During kissing balloon inflation, the Sion Blue wire migrated distally in the D1 causing an Ellis type 3 wire tip perforation in the distal D1. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed however the 8 French (8 Fr) pericardial drain was inadvertently inserted into the RV. It was decided to attempt percutaneous closure with an 8 Fr angio-seal in the catheter lab under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. Our patient did not demonstrate any recurrence of pericardial effusion on repeat echocardiography over 60 days post-procedure. DISCUSSION: Our patient did not demonstrate any recurrence of pericardial effusion on repeat echocardiography over 60 days post-procedure. We feel that the angio-seal vascular closure device represents an effective, minimally invasive treatment for this rare but potentially catastrophic complication of pericardiocentesis. In this case, the technique spared our patient a sternotomy with its associated morbidity.

Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Determine whether an ultrathin biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent ('Orsiro'-BP-SES) has clinical benefits over second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES). METHODS: We conducted a prospective systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing Orsiro BP-SES against DP-DES (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42019147136). The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF): composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation (TLR)) evaluated at the longest available follow-up. RESULTS: Nine trials randomised 11 302 patients to either Orsiro BP-SES or DP-DES. At mean weighted follow-up of 2.8 years, the primary outcome (TLF) occurred in 501 of 6089 (8.2%) participants with BP-SES compared with 495 of 5213 (9.5%) participants with DP-DES. This equates to an absolute risk reduction of 1.3% in TLF in favour of Orsiro BP-SES (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; p=0.03). This was driven by a reduction in TVMI (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98; p=0.03). There were no significant differences in other clinical endpoints: cardiac death, TLR and stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: The Orsiro BP-SES shows promising clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared with contemporary second-generation DES at a short to medium term follow-up. More research is warranted to evaluate performance over a longer follow-up period and in different clinical and lesion subsets.

Measurement and Management of QT Interval Prolongation for General Physicians.

One of the more challenging aspects of ECG interpretation is measurement and interpretation of the QT interval. This interval represents the time taken for the ventricles to completely repolarise after activation. Abnormal prolongation of the QT interval can lead to torsades de pointes, a form of potentially life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Detection of a prolonged QT interval is essential as this can be a reversible problem, particularly in the context of the use of a variety of commonly prescribed medications in the hospital setting. Automated ECG printouts cannot be relied upon to diagnose QT interval prolongation; thus, the onus is on the clinician to identify it. This is a difficult task, as the normal QT interval is typically measured relative to the heart rate. Therefore, the QT interval often requires "correction" for the current heart rate, in order to correctly stratify the risk of torsades de pointes. A wealth of correctional formulae have been derived, but none has proven superior. We present an approach to the ECG in this context, and a step-by-step guide to manually measuring and correcting the QT interval, and an approach to management in common hospital-based clinical scenarios.

Acute right to left shunt-Combination of tricuspid valve endocarditis, Chiari network, and ostium secundum atrial septal defect.

A 72-year-old Tongan female was admitted to our facility with dyspnea and refractory hypoxia. She became febrile and blood cultures were positive for Enterococcus faecalis. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed showing two large vegetations on the tricuspid valve causing severe regurgitation. The tricuspid regurgitant jet with the assistance of a large Chiari network was being directed across an ostium secundum atrial septal defect. This clinical scenario represented an unusual cause of acute right to left shunt explaining the patient's refractory hypoxia. .

Target-vessel versus multivessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

INTRODUCTION: In acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary reperfusion with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat the culprit lesion responsible for infarction improves clinical outcomes in nearly all patients. The concurrent treatment of non-infarct vessels with significant stenoses during initial angiography remains an area of controversy. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Original data were abstracted from each study and used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Only four randomised trials comprising 775 patients met full criteria for analysis. The incidence of non-fatal MI (3.25% vs 8.51%, OR: 0.376, 95% CI: 0.192-0.763), refractory angina (4.01% vs 9.57%, OR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.241-0.741) and repeat revascularisation (10.52% vs 24.20%, OR: 0.336, 95% CI: 0.202-0.661) was lower in the multivessel revascularisation cohort. Death from cardiac causes or refractory angina or non-fatal MI (11.78% vs 28.86%, OR: 0.336, 95% CI: 0.223-0.505) and death from cardiac causes or non-fatal MI (5.26% vs 12.76%, OR: 0.420, 95% CI: 0.245-0.722) were significantly lower in the multivessel revascularisation cohort. The Median Contrast Volume and Procedure Length were similar in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute STEMI who undergo primary PCI, a strategy of treatment of significant non-infarct stenosis (preventive PCI) in addition to the culprit lesion responsible for infarction may result in improved cardiovascular outcomes and reduced overall mortality; however there is insufficient data to fully validate this from currently published literature.