Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Orv Hetil ; 154(16): 627-32, 2013 Apr 21.
Article in Hungarian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23587542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Grade 2 breast carcinomas do not form a uniform prognostic group. AIM: To extend the number of patients and the investigated genes of a previously identified prognostic signature described by the authors that reflect chromosomal instability in order to refine characterization of grade 2 breast cancers and identify driver genes. METHODS: Using publicly available databases, the authors selected 9 target and 3 housekeeping genes that are capable to divide grade 2 breast carcinomas into prognostic groups. Gene expression was investigated by polymerase chain reaction in 249 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors. The results were correlated with relapse-free survival. RESULTS: Histologically grade 2 carcinomas were split into good and a poor prognosis groups. Centroid-based ranking showed that 3 genes, FOXM1, TOP2A and CLDN4 were able to separate the good and poor prognostic groups of grade 2 breast carcinomas. CONCLUSION: Using appropriately selected control genes, a limited set of genes is able to split prognostic groups of breast carcinomas independently from their grade.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Computer Simulation , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Fixatives , Formaldehyde , Gene Expression Profiling/economics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Health Care Costs , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Paraffin Embedding , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Magy Onkol ; 56(2): 75-8, 2012 May.
Article in Hungarian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22629543

ABSTRACT

There is a reasonable heterogeneity in the morphological appearance and the immunohistochemical properties of distinct breast tumors. Furthermore, it is also known that cancer arising in young women have different prognosis than the ones developing in the elderly. We analyzed breast tumors of 41 young (<35 years) and 33 older women (>65 years) regarding histopathological properties and immunohistochemical reactions for ER, PgR, HER2 and Ki-67, as well as HER2 FISH. The longest diameters, thus largest available surface areas of the tumors were included in the evaluation. Different regions were marked for morphology and in all immunohistochemical reactions. The regions in the distinct tumors showing different pathological and immunohistochemical appearance were identical (p<0.001). The number of morphologically different tumor regions were more frequent in tumors developing in the young (1.82 vs. 1.48 regions/tumor), and 53.6% of tumors with heterogeneous architecture were in young vs. 39.4% in the elderly. However, regarding HER2 staining, cancers in the young patients have shown greater variability among the different tumor areas (p=0.007). The origin of tumor cells predicting prognosis remains undetermined. Whether the analysis of the expression pattern of the whole tumor is conducted or the minute regions are separately examined and averaged, the same results can be achieved. With the development of molecular techniques and accurate prognostic and treatment information rendered to samples the question may be soon answered.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Immunophenotyping , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Prognosis
3.
Magy Onkol ; 54(1): 19-26, 2010 Mar.
Article in Hungarian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20350864

ABSTRACT

The two far ends of the age at the diagnosis of breast cancer are the age of younger than 35, and that of older than 70. Most probably, these two groups of patients differ in many ways. The aim of our present study was to underline the fact that age at the diagnosis of breast cancer is indeed a prognostic factor. Between October 1995 and March 2009, 80 old and 51 young breast cancer patients were treated at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest. The prognostic and predictive factors of the tumors were analysed together with the disease-free and overall survival data. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning the menstrual and reproductive factors, histological characteristics and immunophenotype of the tumors. Tumor size, nodal status and the Nottingham Prognostic Index did not show statistically significant differences. A trend to a shorter disease-free survival, higher rate of distant metastases and disease-specific death was seen in the group of young patients, but it was not significant. Overall survival was significantly shorter in the group of young patients. Therefore, we can state that young patients have a more aggressive disease and worse outcome. There is an increased importance of self examination in these groups, since both age groups are beyond the age limits of the screening population in Hungary. The media and primary school education as well should be involved in educating women concerning this aspect. The individual follow-up of young patients with positive family history should also be established.


Subject(s)
Aging , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Genes, Tumor Suppressor , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mutation , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Reproduction , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...