Endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosing and staging of lung cancer by Acquire 22G TBNB versus regular 22G TBNA needles: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has an important role in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Evaluation of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and molecular profiling has become standard of care but cytological samples frequently contain insufficient tumor cells. The 22G Acquire needle with Franseen needle tip was developed to perform transbronchial needle biopsy (TBNB) with improved tissue specimens. This study evaluated if the 22G Acquire TBNB needle results in enhanced PD-L1 suitability rate compared to the regular Expect 22G TBNA needle. METHODS: in this multi-center randomized clinical trial (Netherlands Trial Register NL7701), patients with suspected (N)SCLC and an indication for mediastinal/hilar staging or lung tumor diagnosis were recruited in five university and general hospitals in the Netherlands, Poland, Italy and Czech Republic. Patients were randomized (1:1) between the two needles. Two blinded reference pathologists evaluated the samples. The primary outcome was PD-L1 suitability rate in patients with a final diagnosis of lung cancer. In case no malignancy was diagnosed, the reference standard was surgical verification or 6 month follow-up. RESULTS: 154 patients were randomized (n = 76 Acquire TBNB; n = 78 Expect TBNA) of which 92.9% (n = 143) had a final malignant diagnosis. Suitability for PD-L1 analysis was 80.0% (n = 56/70; 95 %CI 0.68-0.94) with the Acquire needle and 76.7% (n = 56/73; 95 %CI 0.65-0.85) with the Expect needle (p = 0.633). Acquire TBNB needle specimens provided more frequent superior quality (65.3% (95 %CI 0.57-0.73) vs 49.4% (95 %CI 0.41-0.57, p = 0.005) and contained more tissue cores (72.0% (95 %CI 0.60-0.81) vs 41.0% (95 %CI 0.31-0.54, p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in tissue adequacy, suitability for molecular analysis and sensitivity for malignancy and N2/N3 disease. CONCLUSION: The 22G Acquire TBNB needle procured improved quality tissue specimens compared to the Expect TBNA needle but this did not result in an improved the suitability rate for PD-L1 analysis.

Endosonography and endosonography guided needle aspiration for left adrenal gland assessment in lung cancer patients - 10 years' experience.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer patients (LCP) require invasive evaluation of left adrenal glands (LAG) if distant metastases (M1b/1c) are suspected in CT or PET-CT. Only few studies showed utility of endosonography and particularly EUS-b-FNA as minimally invasive endoscopic method of LAG analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive LCP was conducted in two pulmonology centers between January 2010 and December 2019. Records of complete endosonographic staging with use of single ultrasound bronchoscope or two scopes were overviewed. The analysis included cases of enlarged LAG (body size or limbs > 10 mm) examined and sampled by EUS-b-FNA or EUS-FNA. RESULTS: 142 of 2596 LCP staged by complete endosonography (M: 88, F: 54 mean age 64.7) had enlarged LAG, which were biopsied by conventional EUS-FNA (52) and/or by EUS-b-FNA (90). Strong correlation with gland diameter (P < 0.001) was observed. The incidence of LAG metastases in analyzed group was 52.1% (74/142) and regarding histology: SCLC 76.9% (10/13), adenocarcinoma 66.7% (44/66), NSCLC 56.3% (9/16) and SCC 17.5% (7/40). A specificity and PPV for both methods were 100%. A sensitivity, accuracy and NPV for EUS-FNA were 91.7%, 96.2%, 93.3% and for EUS-b-FNA 88%, 93.3% and 87%, respectively and no significant differences for both methods were noted (P = 0.62, 0.44, 0.35). No severe complications afterall biopsies were observed. A six months clinical follow up included all negative LCP with enlarged LAG. CONCLUSIONS: After our study EUS-b-FNA seems to be a reasonable method of choice for LAG assesssment in LCP.

EBUS versus EUS-B for diagnosing sarcoidosis: The International Sarcoidosis Assessment (ISA) randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endosonography with intrathoracic nodal sampling is proposed as the single test with the highest granuloma detection rate in suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II. However, most studies have been performed in limited geographical regions. Studies suggest that oesophageal endosonographic nodal sampling has higher diagnostic yield than endobronchial endosonographic nodal sampling, but a head-to-head comparison of both routes has never been performed. METHODS: Global (14 hospitals, nine countries, four continents) randomized clinical trial was conducted in consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II presenting between May 2015 and August 2017. Using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope, patients were randomized to EBUS or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-B-guided nodal sampling, and to 22- or 25-G ProCore needle aspiration (2 × 2 factorial design). Granuloma detection rate was the primary study endpoint. Final diagnosis was based on cytology/pathology outcomes and clinical/radiological follow-up at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients were randomized: 185 patients to EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and 173 to EUS-B-fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Final diagnosis was sarcoidosis in 306 patients (86%). Granuloma detection rate was 70% (130/185; 95% CI, 63-76) for EBUS-TBNA and 68% (118/173; 95% CI, 61-75) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.67). Sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis was 78% (129/165; 95% CI, 71-84) for EBUS-TBNA and 82% (115/141; 95% CI, 74-87) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.46). There was no significant difference between the two needle types in granuloma detection rate or sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Granuloma detection rate of mediastinal/hilar nodes by endosonography in patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II is high and similar for EBUS and EUS-B. These findings imply that both diagnostic tests can be safely and universally used in suspected sarcoidosis patients.

Ultrasound predictors of left adrenal metastasis in patients with lung cancer: a comparison of computed tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound using ultrasound bronchoscope.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with resectable lung cancer require invasive evaluation of the enlarged left adrenal gland (LAG). Few studies showed the utility of endoscopic ultrasound using ultrasound bronchoscope (EUS­B) in LAG assessment. Moreover, little is known on the combination of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET­CT), and EUS­B for predicting left adrenal metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study performed from 2012 to 2019, patients with left adrenal enlargement were evaluated by CT, PET­CT, and EUS­B, followed by complete endoscopic mediastinal staging. The adrenal glands were sampled by EUS­B-guided fine­needle aspiration. Patients were followed for 6 months. RESULTS: During the staging of lung cancer in 2176 patients, 113 enlarged LAGs (5.19%) were biopsied. Malignancy was reported in 51 LAGs (45.13%). Endoscopic ultrasound upstaged 7 patients (6.2%) and downstaged 11 patients (9.37%) after false CT or PET­CT findings. There were no biopsy­related complications. Radiologic predictors of left adrenal metastases had the highest yield at the following cutoff points: Hounsfield units >23, standardized uptake value >4.2, and LAG size >25 mm. Hypoechogenic LAGs with loss of sea­gull shape on EUS­B were associated with a 28.67­fold higher likelihood of metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for all ultrasound predictors were 86.21%, 85.45%, 85.84%, 85.45%, and 86.21%, respectively. When combined with radiologic features, the respective values were 93.10%, 94.55%, 93.81%, 92.86%, and 94.74%. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoechogenicity and loss of sea­gull shape on EUS­B are the most reliable predictors of left adrenal metastasis. The combination of CT, PET­CT, and EUS­B improves the noninvasive diagnosis of left adrenal metastases in lung cancer patients.

Endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosing and staging of lung cancer by Acquire 22G TBNB versus regular 22G TBNA needles: study protocol of a randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is crucial because it directs treatment and prognosis. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) are important in this process by sampling hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes and centrally located lung tumours. With the upcoming of immunotherapy and targeted therapies, assessment of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and molecular profiling has become important but is often impossible in cytological samples obtained through standard 22G TBNA needles. Recently, a three-pronged cutting edge 22G needle was developed that allows for transbronchial needle biopsy (TBNB). Our objective is to determine if EBUS/EUS-B-guided nodal/lung tumour sampling with Acquire 22G TBNB needles results in an improved suitability rate for the assessment of PD-L1 expression in comparison to standard 22G TBNA needles in patients with a final diagnosis of lung cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an investigator-initiated, parallel group randomised clinical trial. Patients are recruited at respiratory medicine outpatient clinics of participating university and general hospitals in the Netherlands, Poland and Italy. In total 158 adult patients with (suspected) lung cancer are included if they have an indication for mediastinal/hilar lymph node or lung tumour sampling by EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-B-FNA based on current clinical guidelines. Web-based randomisation between the two needles will be performed. Samples obtained from mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes and/or primary tumour will be processed for cytology smears and cell block analysis and reviewed by blinded reference pathologists. An intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. Patients with missing data will be excluded from analysis for that specific variable but included in the analysis of other variables. This study is financially supported by Boston Scientific. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie Amsterdam Medical Center (AMC)). Dissemination will involve publication in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7701; Pre-results.

Observational cross-sectional study of 5279 bronchoscopy results for the practical effectiveness of various biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of lung diseases with particular emphasis on lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchoscopy is the main method in the diagnosis of various lung diseases. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the most modern bronchoscopic technique useful in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer (LC). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the yield of bronchoscopy in patients with suspected various respiratory diseases including LC. In particular, we examined the efficiency of different biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of LC in correlation with its localisation and pathomorphological type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results of pathomorphological examinations from 5279 bronchoscopies performed in 2016-2018 were analysed. The material was collected with EBUS-TBNA, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endobronchial forceps biopsy. Clinical and demographic factors were analysed using the Fisher χ2 test. RESULTS: 5279 patients were diagnosed due to various respiratory symptoms. LC was confirmed in 36.42% of patients. 40.81% of patients had no definitive pathomorphological diagnosis. Among patients with LC, the most frequent diagnosis was non-small cell LC: squamous cell lung cancer (SCC)-32.07% and adenocarcinoma (AC)-30.61%, then small cell LC-25.83% and not otherwise specified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC-NOS)-11.49%. Diagnosis of SCC was obtained significantly more often (χ2=43.143, p<0.000001) by forceps biopsy (41.09%) than by EBUS-TBNA/EUS-FNA (26.62%). On the contrary, diagnosis of AC or NSCLC-NOS was significantly more often (χ2=20.394, p<0.000007, and χ2=3.902, p<0.05, respectively) observed in EBUS-TBNA/EUS-FNA (34.31% and 12.6%) than in endobronchial biopsies (24.52% and 9.64%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of various lung diseases is vital but also has many limitations. Effectiveness of EBUS-TBNA and endobronchial forceps biopsy in the diagnosis of lung cancer is strongly affected by tumour localisation and type of cancer.

Comparison of the diagnostic effectiveness between an expert and a student in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis by transbronchial biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes under the control of endosonography.

INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of mediastinal lymph nodes is currently considered to be the most effective minimally invasive diagnostic method in patients with suspected stage I and II sarcoidosis. However, diagnostic effectiveness depends on the experience and skills of the doctor which is dependent on the number of correctly performed procedures. The aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of the EBUS-TBNA test obtained by an expert in this field vs that of his student. MATERIAL AND METHODS: in patients with a clinical and radiological suspicion of sarcoidosis, EBUS-TBNA procedures were performed by an expert (over 1000 previously performed tests) and by his student who completed basic training (15 procedures performed). In the expert's opinion, the student was experienced enough to perform the EBUS-TBNA on his own. Previously, more than 100 conventional fibreoptic bronchoscopies had been performed by the student. During that time, he had been working in the department of pulmonary diseases and tuberculosis for two years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and accuracy of the EBUS-TBNA test in diagnosing sarcoidosis were calculated. Statistical evaluation was made using ROC curves for the expert and for the student. RESULTS: The study included 215 patients between 22-68 years of age with suspected sarcoidosis who were diagnosed between 2013-2016. 124 EBUS-TBNA tests were performed by the expert, and 91 procedures were performed by the student. The presence of sarcoid granulomas was confirmed by a biopsy in 165 (76.7%) patients. In terms of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, a higher sensitivity and accuracy of the EBUS test was found in the procedures done by the expert (76.7% and 95.3%, respectively) as compared to the results obtained by the student (66.1% and 93.1%, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.11). All tests were assessed in a hospital pathology unit, but not necessarily by one person, which may be a limitation of our research. In this study, only cytological smears were taken into consideration. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, the student, after appropriate training by an expert, achieved a comparable level of diagnostic effectiveness with EBUS-TBNA after performing 90 tests independently.

Endobronchial ultrasound for T4 staging in patients with resectable NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: In lung cancer patients, accurate assessment of mediastinal and vascular tumor invasion (stage T4) is crucial for optimal treatment allocation and to prevent unnecessary thoracotomies. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) for T4-status in patients with centrally located lung cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective study among consecutive patients who underwent EBUS for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer in four hospitals in The Netherlands (Amsterdam, Leiden), Italy (Bologna) and Poland (Zakopane) between 04-2012 and 04-2019. Patients were included if the primary tumor was detected by EBUS and subsequent surgical-pathological staging was performed, which served as the reference standard. T4-status was extracted from EBUS and pathology reports. Chest CT's were re-reviewed for T4-status. RESULTS: 104 patients with lung cancer in whom EBUS detected the primary tumour, and who underwent subsequent surgical-pathological staging were included. 36 patients (35 %) had T4-status, based on vascular (n = 17), mediastinal (n = 15), both vascular and mediastinal (n = 3), or oesophageal invasion (n = 1). For EBUS, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for T4-status were (n = 104): 63.9 % (95 %CI 46.2-79.2 %), 92.6 % (83.7-97.6 %), 82.1 % (65.6-91.7 %), and 82.9 % (75.7-88.2 %), respectively. For chest CT (n = 72): 61.5 % (95 %CI 40.6-79.8 %), 37.0 % (23.2-52.5 %), 35.6 % (27.5-44.6 %), and 63.0 % (47.9-75.9 %), respectively. When combining CT and EBUS with concordant T4 status (n = 33): 90.9 % (95 %CI 58.7-99.8 %), 77.3 % (54.6-92.20 %), 66.7 % (47.5-81.6 %), and 94.4 % (721-99.1%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both EBUS and CT alone are inaccurate for assessing T4-status as standalone test. However, combining a negative EBUS with a negative CT may rule out T4-status with high certainty.

Influence of bilateral mediastinal lymph node dissection on survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients - Randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the effect of bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy (BML) on survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The hypothesis was: BML offers survival benefit as compared with SLND. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial including stage I-IIIA NSCLC patients was performed. All patients underwent anatomical lung resection. BML was performed during the same operation via additional cervical incision (BML group). In the control group, standard lymphadenectomy (systematic lymph node dissection, SLND) was performed. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients were randomized. No significant difference was found in the type of lung resection, blood loss, chest tube output, air leak, pain, and complications (p = 0.188-0.959). In the BML group, the operative time was longer (318 vs 223 min, p < 0.001) with higher number of removed N2 nodes (24 vs 14, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was 72 % in the BML group vs 53 % in the SLND group (OR 2.33, 95 % CI 0.95-5.69, p = 0.062). Separate comparisons for different lobar locations of the tumor have shown no significant difference in survival for the right lung tumors and left upper lobe tumors. For the left lower lobe tumors, survival time was longer in the BML group (p = 0.021), and the 5-year survival rate was 90.9 % vs 37.5 %, (OR 16.66, 95 % CI 1.36-204.04, p = 0.0277). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSCLC located in the left lower lobe, bilateral lymph node dissection may be associated with better survival. The invasiveness of BML is comparable to that of SLND.

Usefulness of combined endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: a prospective multicenter trial.

INTRODUCTION: Needle biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes is an accepted method for the diagnostic workup of sarcoidosis, but the optimal endosonography­guided approach is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the relative diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound­guided needle aspiration (CUS­b­NA), which includes endobronchial ultrasound­guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS­TBNA) with endoscopic ultrasound fine­needle aspiration (EUS­b­FNA), as well as the role of the cell block (CB) technique and lymph node localization in the diagnostic workup of sarcoidosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study including consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of stage I or II sarcoidosis. CUS­b­NA with smears and CB technique were performed in the whole study group. If a biopsy result was not conclusive, an invasive diagnostic workup and a 6-month follow­up were scheduled. RESULTS: Out of 77 screened patients, 54 signed written consent and 50 were enrolled for the final analysis. The overall sensitivity of EBUS­TBNA, EUS­b­FNA, and CUS­b­NA was 76.6%, 70.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. There were no differences between EBUS­TBNA and EUS­b­FNA (P = 0.52) but CUS­b­NA had a higher diagnostic yield (P = 0.005 and P = 0.001, respectively). Adding the CB method to smear technique (P = 0.008) and biopsy of the subcarinal lymph nodes increased the diagnostic yield (P = 0.001).  Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of CUS­b­NA is higher than that of endosonographic techniques alone in the diagnostic workup of stage I and II sarcoidosis. The preparation of cytological material including CB and the choice of the subcarinal lymph node station for the biopsy increase the diagnostic efficacy.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy guided by radial mini-probe endobronchial ultrasound in interstitial lung diseases - a multicenter prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is commonly used in diagnosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Ageneral anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, balloon blockers and fluoroscopy control is the most common modality. Simplifying the procedure without decreasing it's safety could result in wider use. Prospective, observational study was conducted in three Polish pulmonology centers to evaluate safety and diagnostic yield of TBLC under conscious sedation, without intubation and bronchial blockers and with radial-EBUS guidance instead of fluoroscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In patients suspected of ILD, in accordance with high resolution computer tomography (HRCT) selected lung segments were examined with radial-EBUS mini probe without aguide sheath. If the lung infiltrations were visible this locations were preferred. If not, specimens were taken from two different segments of the same lobe. Two to five biopsies with freezing time 5-8 seconds were performed. Moreover ultrasound examination was used to avoid injury of lung vessels. RESULTS: From March 2017 to September 2019 - 114 patients (M: 59, F: 55) of mean (SD) age 54 (14) years were included to the study on the basis of medical history and HRCT. Histopathology was conclusive in 90 (79%) patients and included 16 different diagnoses (sarcoidosis, EAA, COP predominantly). 24 inconclusive biopsies of unclassifiable pulmonary fibrosis were followed up. Complications included five cases (4.4%) of pneumothorax requiring achest tube drainage and aminor and moderate bleeding in few cases. There was no need for use of balloon bronchial blockers. CONCLUSIONS: TBLC under conscious sedation guided by radial EBUS mini-probe is novel, reasonable and safe technique for histological diagnosis of ILDs.

[Advances in endoscopic diagnosis of sarcoidosis]. / Postepy w endoskopowej diagnostyce sarkoidozy.

A diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis is based on the assessment of clinical outcome, radiology findings and detection of noncaseating granulomas in cytology or histology specimens. Cytological material obtained from enlarged lymph nodes and/or histological specimens from bronchial mucosa and lung tissue are examined according to sarcoidosis stage. The most available are standard bronchoscopic methods as conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (cTBNA), endobronchial biopsy (EBB) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) both performed with use of forceps. The new endoscopic techniques introduced to pulmonary diagnostics are: endobronchial ultrasoundguided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or if used by the ultrasound bronchoscope (EUS-b-FNA) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC). Considering a dynamic improvement in cytology assessment techniques (processed as cytology smears and cell blocks) the endoscopic methods with use of fine needle aspiration biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes became a method of choice in sarcoidosis with lymphadenopathy, and published data suggest a higher diagnostic yield when performed under endosonographic guidance. The optimal approach (transbronchial or transesophageal) and the selection of mediastinal lymph node stations considered for biopsy still need evaluation. Also TBLC, successfully used in the diagnosis of other diffuse parenchymal lung diseases, requires more experiences and trials to establish its role in diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Current Practice of Airway Stenting in the Adult Population in Europe: A Survey of the European Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP).

BACKGROUND: Airway stenting (AS) commenced in Europe circa 1987 with the first placement of a dedicated silicone airway stent. Subsequently, over the last 3 decades, AS was spread throughout Europe, using different insertion techniques and different types of stents. OBJECTIVES: This study is an international survey conducted by the European Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP) focusing on AS practice within 26 European countries. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all EABIP National Delegates in February 2015. National delegates were responsible for obtaining precise and objective data regarding the current AS practice in their country. The deadline for data collection was February 2016. RESULTS: France, Germany, and the UK are the 3 leading countries in terms of number of centres performing AS. These 3 nations represent the highest ranked nations within Europe in terms of gross national income. Overall, pulmonologists perform AS exclusively in 5 countries and predominately in 12. AS is performed almost exclusively in public hospitals. AS performed under general anaesthesia is the rule for the majority of institutions, and local anaesthesia is an alternative in 9 countries. Rigid bronchoscopy techniques are predominant in 20 countries. Amongst commercially available stents, both Dumon and Ultraflex are by far the most commonly deployed. Finally, 11 countries reported that AS is an economically viable activity, while 10 claimed that it is not. CONCLUSION: This EABIP survey demonstrates that there is significant heterogeneity in AS practice within Europe. Therapeutic bronchoscopy training and economic issues/reimbursement for procedures are likely to be the primary reasons explaining these findings.

EUS-B-FNA vs conventional EUS-FNA for left adrenal gland analysis in lung cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with lung cancer, left adrenal glands (LAG) suspected for distant metastases (M1b) based on imaging require further evaluation for a definitive diagnosis. Tissue acquisition is regularly performed using conventional EUS-FNA. The aim of this study was to investigate the success rate of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration using the EBUS scope (EUS-B-FNA) for LAG analysis. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter study in consecutive patients with (suspected) lung cancer and suspected mediastinal and LAG metastases. Following complete mediastinal staging using the EBUS scope (EBUS+EUS-B), the LAG was evaluated and sampled by both EUS-B (experimental procedure) and conventional EUS (current standard of care). RESULTS: The success rate for LAG analysis (visualized, sampled and adequate tissue obtained) was 89% (39/44; 95% CI 76-95%) for EUS-B-FNA, and 93% (41/44; 95%CI 82-98%) for EUS-FNA. In the absence of metastases at EUS-B and/or EUS, surgical verification of the LAG or 6 months clinical and radiological follow-up was obtained, but missing for 5 patients. The prevalence of LAG metastases was 54% (21/39). In patients in whom LAG was seen and sampled, sensitivity for LAG metastases was at least 87% (95%CI 65-97%) for EUS-B, and at least 83% (95%CI 62-95%) for conventional EUS. CONCLUSION: LAG analysis by EUS-B shows a similar high success rate in comparison to conventional EUS. IMPLICATION: Both a mediastinal nodal and LAG evaluation can be adequately performed with just an EBUS scope and single endoscopist. This staging strategy is likely to reduce patient-burden and costs.

Initial Polish experience of Flexible 19 gauge Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration.

INTRODUCTION: EBUS is a well established minimally invasive diagnostic tool for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. The novel ViziShot Flex 19G needle (Olympus Respiratory America, Redmond, WA, USA) was introduced in 2015 in order to improve loaded scope flexion and to obtain larger tissue samples for analysis. The aims of this study were to assess diagnostic yield of Flex 19G needles and to present endoscopist's feedback about the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Flex 19G needles were used in patients with hilar and/or mediastinal adenopathy in two Polish pulmonology centers. Cytology smears and cell blocks (CB) were prepared. The prospective analysis was performed due to collected data. RESULTS: Twenty two selected patients with confirmed adenopathy on chest-CT (mean age 58 ± 12) underwent EBUS-TBNA with use of Flex 19G needles. All procedures occurred to be diagnostic for smears (yield 100%). The malignancy was found in 15 cases (68.2%), and benign adenopathy in 7 (31.8%). In 12 of 14 cases of lung cancer (yield 85.7%) CB were diagnostic for immunohistochemical and molecular staining. After puncturing nodes, especially in hilar position not extensive bleeding was observed. Comparing to standard 21/22G EBUS-TBNA endoscopists underlined better flexion of loaded scope and sample adequacy and found non-significant differences in another biopsy details. CONCLUSIONS: The first Polish experience with use of Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA needle occurs to be similar in performance with standard technique with use of 22/21G needles and presents high diagnostic yield for lung cancer diagnostics, especially when preparing CB. A safety profile of the biopsy is acceptable.

Endosonography­guided fine­needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: a randomized study.

INTRODUCTION    There are no widely accepted standards for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVES    The aim of this study was to assess the relative diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EBUS -FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS -FNA), and to compare them with standard diagnostic techniques such as endobronchial biopsy (EBB), transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), and mediastinoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS    This was a prospective randomized study including consecutive patients with clinical diagnosis of stage I or II sarcoidosis. EBB, TBLB, and TBNA were performed at baseline in all patients. Subsequently, patients were randomized to group A (EBUS -FNA) or group B (EUS -FNA). Next, a crossover control test was performed: all patients with negative results in group A underwent EUS -FNA and all patients with negative results in group B underwent EBUS -FNA. If sarcoidosis was not confirmed, mediastinoscopy was performed. RESULTS    We enrolled 106 patients, of whom 100 were available for the final analysis. The overall sensitivity and accuracy of standard endoscopic methods were 64% each. When analyzing each of the standard endoscopic methods separately, the diagnosis was confirmed with EBB in 12 patients (12%), with TBLB in 42 patients (42%), and with TBNA in 44 patients (44%). The sensitivity and accuracy of each endosonographic technique were significantly higher than those of EBB+TBLB+TBNA (P = 0.0112 vs P = 0.0134). CONCLUSIONS    The sensitivity and accuracy of EBUS -FNA and EUS -FNA are significantly higher than those of standard endoscopic methods. Moreover, the sensitivity and accuracy of EUS -FNA tend to be higher than those of EBUS -FNA.