Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Guideline for the Prevention of Stress-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Adults.

RATIONALE: Critically ill adults can develop stress-related mucosal damage from gastrointestinal hypoperfusion and reperfusion injury, predisposing them to clinically important stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of UGIB in adults in the ICU. DESIGN: A multiprofessional panel of 18 international experts from dietetics, critical care medicine, nursing, and pharmacy, and two methodologists developed evidence-based recommendations in alignment with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Conflict-of-interest policies were strictly followed during all phases of guideline development including task force selection and voting. METHODS: The panel members identified and formulated 13 Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. We conducted a systematic review for each question to identify the best available evidence, statistically analyzed the evidence, and then assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate the recommendations. Good practice statements were included to provide additional guidance. RESULTS: The panel generated nine conditional recommendations and made four good practice statements. Factors that likely increase the risk for clinically important stress-related UGIB in critically ill adults include coagulopathy, shock, and chronic liver disease. There is no firm evidence for mechanical ventilation alone being a risk factor. Enteral nutrition probably reduces UGIB risk. All critically ill adults with factors that likely increase the risk for stress-related UGIB should receive either proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists, at low dosage regimens, to prevent UGIB. Prophylaxis should be discontinued when critical illness is no longer evident or the risk factor(s) is no longer present despite ongoing critical illness. Discontinuation of stress ulcer prophylaxis before transfer out of the ICU is necessary to prevent inappropriate prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: The guideline panel achieved consensus regarding the recommendations for the prevention of stress-related UGIB. These recommendations are intended for consideration along with the patient's existing clinical status.

A Narrative Review on the Administration of Inhaled Prostaglandins in Critically Ill Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of inhaled prostaglandins on both oxygenation and mortality in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with a focus on safety and efficacy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of MEDLINE was performed using the following search terms: inhaled prostaglandins, inhaled epoprostenol, inhaled nitric oxide, ARDS, critically ill. All abstracts were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant English-language reports and studies conducted in humans between 1980 and June 2023 were considered. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data regarding inhaled prostaglandins and their effect on oxygenation are limited but show a benefit in patients who respond to therapy, and data pertaining to their effect on mortality is scarce. Concerns exist regarding the formulation of inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) utilized in addition to modes of medication delivery; however, the limited data surrounding their use have shown a reasonable safety profile. Other avenues and beneficial effects may exist with inhaled prostaglandins, such as use in COVID-19-associated ARDS or non-COVID-19 ARDS patients undergoing noninvasive mechanical ventilation or during patient transport. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: The use of inhaled prostaglandins can be considered in critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS or non-COVID-19 ARDS who are experiencing difficulties with oxygenation refractory to nonpharmacologic strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The use of iEPO and other inhaled prostaglandins requires further investigation to fully elucidate their effects on clinical outcomes, but it appears these medications may have a potential benefit in COVID-19-associated ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients with refractory hypoxemia but with little effect on mortality.

Evaluation of Goal Phenytoin Levels After an Initial Intravenous Loading Dose at an Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Phenytoin intravenous loading doses are administered in status epilepticus to rapidly achieve therapeutic levels. Accurately assessing phenytoin levels after the initial load can be challenging because of its complex pharmacokinetic profile and nonstandardized weight-based loading doses. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this analysis were to determine the incidence of patients achieving goal phenytoin levels after the initial loading dose and characterize factors that contribute to achieving the goal level. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort analysis was approved by our institutional review board and included adult patients who received a phenytoin load from May 2016 to March 2021. Patients were excluded if no total phenytoin level was drawn within 24 hours of the load, if the maintenance dose was given before the first level was drawn, or if the patient was on phenytoin before the load. The major endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving a corrected goal phenytoin level of ≥10 mcg/mL after the initial load. Multivariate regression was used to determine predictors of achieving the goal phenytoin level. RESULTS: Of the 152 patients included, 139 patients (91.4%) achieved a corrected goal level after the first load. Patients at goal received a significantly higher median weight-based loading dose (19.1 mg/kg [15.0-20.0] vs 12.6 mg/kg [10.1-15.0], P < 0.01). The multivariate analysis identified weight-based dosing as a statistically significant predictor of achieving the corrected goal level (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.53; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Most patients achieved a corrected goal phenytoin level after the initial load. A higher median weight-based loading dose was shown to be a predictor of achieving the goal level and should be encouraged for rapid seizure termination. Future studies are warranted to confirm patient-specific factors that affect rapid achievement of the goal phenytoin level.

Implementation of a myasthenia gravis drug-disease interaction clinical decision support tool reduces prescribing of high-risk medications.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: High-risk medication exposure is a modifiable risk factor for myasthenic exacerbation and crisis. We evaluated whether real-time electronic clinical decision support (CDS) was effective in reducing the rate of prescribing potentially high-risk medications to avoid or use with caution in patients with myasthenia gravis. METHODS: An expert panel reviewed the available drug-disease pairings and associated severity levels to activate the alerts for CDS. All unique alerts activated in both inpatient and outpatient contexts were analyzed over a two-year period. Clinical context, alert severity, medication class, and alert action were collected. The primary outcome was alert override rate. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of unique medication exposures avoided and predictors of alert override. RESULTS: During the analysis period, 2817 unique alerts fired, representing 830 distinct patient-medication exposures for 577 unique patients. The overall alert override rate was 85% (80.3% for inpatient alerts and 95.8% for outpatient alerts). Of unique medication-patient exposures, 19% were avoided because of the alert. Assigned alert severity of "contraindicated" were less likely to be overridden (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.56), as well as alerts activated during evening staffing (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87). DISCUSSION: Implementation of a myasthenia gravis drug-disease interaction alert reduced overall patient exposure to potentially harmful medications by approximately 19%. Future optimization includes enhanced provider and pharmacist education. Further refinement of alert logic criteria to optimize medication risk reduction and reduce alert fatigue is warranted to support clinicians in prescribing and reduce electronic health record time burden.

Evaluation of Rocuronium Continuous Infusion in Critically Ill Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Drug Shortages.

Background: Limited data exist to support the use of rocuronium continuous infusions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objective: To evaluate the dosing and monitoring of adult patients who received rocuronium for hypoxemic respiratory failure during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study from March 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020. We identified all adult patients admitted to any ICU who received rocuronium via continuous infusion. Patients were excluded if they received rocuronium for <6 hours. The main outcome of this study was to determine the median rocuronium maintenance continuous infusion rate in the ICU. Secondary outcomes of this study included the initial continuous infusion rate, duration of therapy, cumulative dose, frequency and median of rocuronium boluses, time to resolution of neuromuscular blockade, and the relationship between the hourly administration rates of rocuronium and train-of-four (TOF) assessments. Results: Seventy-one patients and 97 paralytic infusions were included. Fifty-nine patients (83%) were positive for SARS CoV-2. Of the 97 rocuronium infusions, the median dose at initiation was 3 (3-5) mcg/kg/min and duration of infusion was 45 (23.6-92.5) hours. The median continuous infusion maintenance rate was 4.3 (2.8-7.2) mcg/kg/min. There was a negligible correlation between the dose of rocuronium and the TOF results (r = .04). A total of 1775 TOFs were assessed, of which 46.2% were over-paralyzed, 35.7% well-paralyzed, and 18.1% under-paralyzed. Conclusions: The initial and maintenance infusion doses in our analysis were lower than what have been previously referenced.

Safety of Intravenous Push Ertapenem Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Background: Recent shortages of intravenous (IV) fluids have resulted in healthcare systems converting administration of many medications from IV piggyback (IVPB) to IV push (IVP). Administering medications via IVP presents numerous advantages; however, IV site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration may occur. Objective: The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the infusion site safety of ertapenem given as peripheral IVP compared to IVPB in adult patients. Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective study. Patients, ages 18 or older, receiving IV ertapenem were identified. The major endpoints analyzed were IV site reactions including phlebitis and infiltration. The Naranjo Nomogram was utilized to assess the causality of the reactions to determine the likelihood of whether the event was caused by the medication itself or other factors. Results: To date, 283 administrations (92 patients) in the IVP group and 319 administrations (82 patients) in the IVPB group were analyzed. There were 13 IV site reactions compared to 8 in the IVP vs IVPB group, respectively (P-value = 0.16). Ten of the events in the IVP group were deemed "possible" and 2 deemed "doubtful," while the remaining event was considered "probable" per the Naranjo Nomogram. Of the events in the IVPB group, all 8 were found to be "possible." Conclusion: The administration of IVP ertapenem showed comparable rates of infusion site reactions compared to IVPB. Implementation of IVP ertapenem appears to be associated with infusion site safety similar to IVPB and should be considered safe to administer.

Practical approach to clinical controversies in glycemic control for hospitalized surgical patients.

The importance of glycemic management in surgical patient populations stems from an association between hyperglycemia and increased rates of surgical site infections, sepsis, and mortality. Various guidelines provide recommendations regarding target glucose concentrations, but all stress the importance of avoiding hypoglycemia as well. Within the surgical patient population, glycemic targets may vary further depending on the surgical service, such as cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, or reconstructive burn surgery. Glycemic management in critically ill surgical patients is achieved primarily through the use of intravenous insulin infusion protocols. These protocols can include fixed protocols, multiplication factor protocols, and computerized algorithms. In contrast, noncritically ill surgical patients are generally managed through the utilization of subcutaneous insulin with a combination of basal, bolus, and sliding scale insulin. Insulin protocols should be effective at maintaining glucose concentrations within the specified target range with minimal hypoglycemic events. Monitoring glucose concentrations while on either an intravenous or subcutaneous insulin protocol is essential. Point-of-care testing is the primary method for monitoring glucose concentrations in both critically ill and noncritically ill surgical patients and allows for adjustment of the insulin regimen. As patients move between units and to the outpatient setting, ensuring adequate follow-up is essential to maintaining control of hyperglycemia.

Evaluation of the safety of 500 mg intravenous push thiamine at a tertiary academic medical center.

Background: Thiamine, also known as vitamin B1, is an essential water-soluble micronutrient. Although thiamine has minimal safety concerns, parenteral administration has been associated with rare cases of anaphylactic shock, cardiac arrest, and injection site reaction. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the incidence of anaphylaxis and injection site reactions associated with the administration of thiamine 500 mg as an intravenous (IV) push in adult patients. Method: This single-center, retrospective analysis was performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic health records were used to identify all adult patients who were ordered for thiamine 500 mg IV push between July 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. For the major and minor endpoints, anaphylaxis and injection site reactions were assessed, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used as appropriate. Results: A total of 463 doses of thiamine in 69 patients were evaluated. Thiamine was administered peripherally for 392 (84.7%) doses and centrally for 68 (14.7) doses. No anaphylactic reactions were observed. A total of 4 injection site reactions (0.86%) were noted with 4 unique doses. All reactions were classified as low-grade based on our institutional grading system. All injection site reactions were classified as "possible" (Naranjo score of 1-4). Conclusion: Administration of IV push 500 mg thiamine was not associated with anaphylactic events and was associated with a low rate of injection site reactions.

Managing Clinical Programs in Pharmacy at an Academic Medical Center in the United States.

Managing clinical pharmacy programs requires communication, coordination, and organization to provide the best possible care to patients and to support staff members. While different areas of pharmacy have slight variations in management style, there are core concepts that all clinical managers should address. These include training, staff evaluation and  support, assessment and improvement of policies and processes and research. Standardized training performed by high performing members of  staff is essential in providing the framework for strong employees and clinical  pharmacists. Routine communication, evaluation, and discussion of reward and promotion will provide support to staff and recognition of high-quality  work. Continued evaluation and improvement of policies and processes will  bring attention to areas of improvement and how the change can be agreed  upon and implemented. Research is necessary to advance the healthcare  practice and improve patient outcomes. Managers and administrators should tailor their approach based on what is best for their practice setting,  institution, and staff to promote strong and capable pharmacists, policies, and workflow to provide the best possible care to patients.

La gestión de los programas de Farmacia Clínica requiere comunicación, coordinación y organización para brindar la mejor atención  posible a los pacientes y apoyar a los profesionales de los servicios de  farmacia. Si bien existen ligeras variaciones entre los estilos de gestión de los  diferentes ámbitos de la farmacia hospitalaria, existen algunos conceptos  básicos que todos los gestores clínicos deben abordar. Estos incluyen  formación, evaluación y apoyo al personal, evaluación y mejora de políticas y  procesos, e investigación y docencia. La formación reglada impartida por  personal cualificado es esencial para proporcionar un marco de actuación sólido encaminado a fortalecer las competencias del personal en general y de  los farmacéuticos clínicos en particular. La comunicación, evaluación y  discusión continuas sobre recompensas y promociones sirven para intensificar el apoyo al personal y reconocer la excelencia profesional. La  evaluación y mejora continuas de políticas y procesos ayudan a identificar  posibles áreas de mejora y a consensuar e implementar los cambios  necesarios. La investigación es necesaria para optimizar la atención sanitaria y  mejorar los resultados en salud. Los gerentes y responsables hospitalarios  deben adaptar sus métodos de trabajo en función de las necesidades de su  práctica asistencial, de las características de la institución en la que trabajan y  de los profesionales que ejercen sus funciones en ella. De este modo, podrá  promoverse el desarrollo de profesionales farmacéuticos, políticas y rutinas de  trabajo que permitan ofrecer a los pacientes la más alta calidad asistencial.

Gestión de programas clínicos en farmacia en un hospital docente de los Estados Unidos / Managing Clinical Programs in Pharmacy at an Academic Medical Center in the United States

La gestión de los programas de Farmacia Clínica requiere comunicación,coordinación y organización para brindar la mejor atención posiblea los pacientes y apoyar a los profesionales de los servicios de farmacia. Sibien existen ligeras variaciones entre los estilos de gestión de los diferentesámbitos de la farmacia hospitalaria, existen algunos conceptos básicos quetodos los gestores clínicos deben abordar. Estos incluyen formación, evaluacióny apoyo al personal, evaluación y mejora de políticas y procesos,e investigación y docencia. La formación reglada impartida por personalcualificado es esencial para proporcionar un marco de actuación sólidoencaminado a fortalecer las competencias del personal en general y delos farmacéuticos clínicos en particular. La comunicación, evaluación y discusióncontinuas sobre recompensas y promociones sirven para intensificarel apoyo al personal y reconocer la excelencia profesional. La evaluacióny mejora continuas de políticas y procesos ayudan a identificar posiblesáreas de mejora y a consensuar e implementar los cambios necesarios. Lainvestigación es necesaria para optimizar la atención sanitaria y mejorarlos resultados en salud. Los gerentes y responsables hospitalarios debenadaptar sus métodos de trabajo en función de las necesidades de su prácticaasistencial, de las características de la institución en la que trabajany de los profesionales que ejercen sus funciones en ella. De este modo,podrá promoverse el desarrollo de profesionales farmacéuticos, políticas yrutinas de trabajo que permitan ofrecer a los pacientes la más alta calidadasistencial.

Managing clinical pharmacy programs requires communication, coordination,and organization to provide the best possible care to patients andto support staff members. While different areas of pharmacy have slightvariations in management style, there are core concepts that all clinicalmanagers should address. These include training, staff evaluation and support,assessment and improvement of policies and processes and research.Standardized training performed by high performing members of staff isessential in providing the framework for strong employees and clinical pharmacists.Routine communication, evaluation, and discussion of reward andpromotion will provide support to staff and recognition of high-quality work.Continued evaluation and improvement of policies and processes will bringattention to areas of improvement and how the change can be agreed uponand implemented. Research is necessary to advance the healthcare practiceand improve patient outcomes. Managers and administrators shouldtailor their approach based on what is best for their practice setting, institution,and staff to promote strong and capable pharmacists, policies, andworkflow to provide the best possible care to patients.

Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women's Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to compare the safety profile of IVP to intravenous piggyback (IVPB) levetiracetam administration. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, single-center, pre-post analysis was performed between 1 November, 2019 and 30 May, 2020. The electronic health record was used to identify all administrations of intravenous levetiracetam greater than 1000 mg in patients ≥ 18 years old. The major safety outcomes included hypotension, bradycardia, drug-induced sedation, and intravenous site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration. The major efficiency outcome was the time from pharmacy order verification to first-dose administration. RESULTS: A total of 498 administrations in 162 patients were included in the analysis: 252 administrations in 84 patients in the IVP group and 246 administrations in 78 patients in the IVPB group. The incidence of bradycardia was 7 vs 3 (3.2% vs 1.5%, p = 0.34); hypotension 10 vs 6 (5.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.44); sedation 21 vs 36 (19.3% vs 27.9%, p = 0.12); and peripheral IV site reactions 0 vs 1 (0% vs 0.6%, p = 0.39) in the IVP vs IVPB groups, respectively. The median time between order verification and first-dose administration was significantly reduced in the IVP vs IVPB group (23.5 vs 55 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous push levetiracetam administration of doses up to 4000 mg was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, sedation, and infusion site-related adverse events compared to IVPB and resulted in a significant reduction in time to first-dose administration. Intravenous push levetiracetam in doses as high as 4000 mg may be considered safe with appropriate monitoring.

Safety and efficacy of transitioning from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin in critically ill patients.

Background Intravenous (IV) insulin is commonly used for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. However, an assessment of real-world practices for the transition process from IV to Subcutaneous (SC) is lacking. Objective The objective of this study was to describe the real-world practice during insulin transition from IV to SC in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Setting ICUs at a tertiary medical center. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study. Data were obtained from electronic medical records for all ICU patients for whom insulin infusions were ordered between Nov 2017-2018. Adult ICU patients were included if they were transitioned to a SC insulin regimen after spending at least 6 h on IV insulin infusion. Data collected include blood glucose readings, transition percentage, and the type of insulin regimen used after transition. Main outcome measure Assessment of the transition percentage and dysglycemic events during the insulin transition process from IV to SC. Results Two hundred patients with 4702 blood glucose checks were included. Of the included patients, 65% (130/200) were transitioned to a basal insulin-containing regimen. The median transition percentage in those patients was 45% [IQR: 28 - 69]. In the overall cohort, the number of patients who developed moderate and severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher prior to transition, while hyperglycemia was significantly higher after insulin transition. Conclusion We observed that patients were converted to SC therapy using a lower transition percentage than previously described. More data are needed to optimize the transition process in critically ill patients.

Evaluation of a Phenobarbital-Based Protocol for Severe Alcohol Withdrawal in Critically Ill Patients.

Background: Phenobarbital offers several possible advantages to benzodiazepines including a longer half-life and anti-glutamate activity, and is an alternative for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a phenobarbital protocol for alcohol withdrawal newly implemented at our institution. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of adult patients admitted to the medical/surgical/burn/trauma intensive care unit (ICU) with or at risk of severe alcohol withdrawal. Patients who were admitted prior to guideline implementation and received scheduled benzodiazepines (PRE) were compared to those who received phenobarbital post guideline update (POST). The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS). Results: Upon analysis, 68 patients in the PRE and 64 patients in the POST were identified for inclusion. The median APACHE II score was significantly higher in the POST (4.5 [3:9] vs 10 [5:13], P < 0.001). ICU (2 [1:2] vs 2 [2:5], P = 0.002) and hospital (4.5 [3:6] vs 8 [6:12], P < 0.001) LOS were significantly longer in the POST. There was no difference in mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation. More patients required propofol or dexmedetomidine on day one in the POST (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients in the POST had significantly longer ICU and hospital LOS, and had a higher baseline severity of illness. Future research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of phenobarbital compared to benzodiazepines for severe alcohol withdrawal.

Impact of the 2018 Society of Critical Care Medicine Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Guidelines on Nonopioid Analgesic Use and Related Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults After Major Surgery.

We compared ICU nonopioid analgesic use, opioid use, and pain before and after Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep guideline publication at one academic center among critically ill adults receiving an opioid infusion and greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation after major surgery. The 2017 (n = 77) and 2019 (n = 57) groups were similar at baseline. The 2019 (vs 2017) patients were more likely to receive scheduled IV/oral acetaminophen (84% vs 69%; p = 0.05), less likely to receive a lidocaine patch (33% vs 50%; p = 0.05), and just as likely to receive ketamine (4% vs 3%; p = 1.0), an nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (7% vs 3%; p = 0.26), or gabapentin/pregabalin (16% vs 9%; p = 0.23). Daily average opioid exposure (in IV morphine milligram equivalent) was not different (70 [42-99] [2017] vs 78 mg [49-109 mg]; p = 0.94). The 2019 (vs 2017) group spent more ICU days with severe pain (p = 0.04). At our center, Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep guideline publication had little effect on nonopioid analgesic or opioid prescribing practices in critically ill surgical adults.

Evaluating the Safety of Continuous Infusion Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and the impact on opioid requirements and pain scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, single-arm analysis of adult patients who received intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients were excluded if they received lidocaine for any indication other than pain or if lidocaine was only given intraoperatively. The primary outcome of this analysis was to determine the incidence of adverse effects (AEs) and the reason for discontinuation of lidocaine. Secondary outcomes included median daily pain scores (visual analog scale and Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool) and opioid consumption (daily morphine milligram equivalents) 24 hours before infusion and during day 1. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients were evaluated of which 298 (65.9%) patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 154 patients excluded, 153 did not receive lidocaine postoperatively. The median duration of infusion was 34 [20:48] hours with a median initial and maintenance rate of 1 mg/kg/h dosed on ideal body weight. In our analysis, 174 (58.4%) patients had a documented AE during infusion and 38 (12.8%) had lidocaine discontinued because of an AE. The most common AE was nausea in 62 (20.8%) patients and the most common reason for discontinuation was confusion in 8 (2.7%) patients. Daily morphine milligram equivalents (P<0.001) and visual analog scale (P<0.001) significantly decreased when comparing 24 hours before infusion and day 1. CONCLUSION: Although a majority of patients receiving lidocaine for postoperative pain experienced an AE, this did not result in discontinuation in most patients.

Intravenous levothyroxine stewardship program at a tertiary academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Based on the pharmacokinetic profile of levothyroxine, a 3-day hold guideline for adult patients ordered for intravenous (IV) levothyroxine was implemented at a tertiary academic medical center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of an IV levothyroxine hold guideline. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective analysis identified patients ordered for IV levothyroxine during a 13-week period before and after implementation of the guideline. The primary outcome was guideline adherence, defined as full implementation of the 3-day hold. Secondary outcomes included the number of IV levothyroxine administrations avoided in the post-guideline group, extrapolated yearly cost avoidance (EYCA) after guideline implementation, reasons for guideline non-adherence, and number of safety reports involving IV levothyroxine. RESULTS: A total of 166 and 134 patients met inclusion criteria for the pre- and post-guideline groups, respectively. Guideline adherence was observed in 94 (70.1%) patients, resulting in 276 vials saved in the 13-week post-guideline period, which translated to an EYCA of $139,877. Forty orders (29.9%) were non-adherent to the guideline, with the most common reason stated as nil per os (NPO). No difference in safety outcomes was seen between the pre- and post-guideline groups, as evidenced by 1 safety report in each group. CONCLUSION: We observed a high rate of adherence to an IV levothyroxine hold guideline. This was associated with a substantial cost savings over the study period with no increase in reported safety events. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of an inpatient IV levothyroxine 3-day hold guideline.

Evaluation of Desmopressin in Critically Ill Patients with Hyponatremia Requiring 3% Hypertonic Saline.

BACKGROUND: Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used for hyponatremia management but has been associated with increases in hospital length of stay and duration of hypertonic saline use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hyponatremia management strategies and their effect on sodium correction in critically ill patients requiring 3% hypertonic saline (3HS). METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included critically ill patients with hyponatremia (serum sodium ≤ 125 mEq/L) receiving 3HS from May 31 2015, to May 31 2019. Patients were divided into those who received 3HS for hyponatremia management (HTS) and those who received proactive or reactive DDAVP in addition to 3HS (D-HTS). Patients in either group could receive rescue DDAVP. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving goal sodium correction of 5-10 mEq/L 24 h after 3HS initiation. RESULTS: Goal sodium correction was achieved in 52.5% of patients in HTS compared to 65.6% of patients in D-HTS (p = 0.21). Patients in HTS had a shorter duration of 3HS infusion (p = 0.0022) with no difference in ICU length of stay, free water intake, urine output, or serum sodium increases 12 and 24 h after receiving 3HS. Overcorrection during any 24- or 48 h period was not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients in HTS and D-HTS had similar rates of achieving goal sodium correction at 24 h. A proactive or reactive DDAVP strategy led to an increase in 3HS duration and total amount with no significant difference in rates of overcorrection. Prospective, randomized studies assessing standardized strategies for hyponatremia management and DDAVP administration are warranted.

Characterization of Nocturnal Neuroactive Medication Use and Related Sleep Documentation in Critically Ill Adults.

We retrospectively characterized scheduled, newly initiated, nocturnal neuroactive medication use, and related clinician documentation, in a cohort of consecutive adults admitted greater than or equal to 24 hours to seven different medical/surgical ICUs at two academic centers who had not received a scheduled nocturnal neuroactive medication prior to admission, over a 5-month period (April 1, 2017, to August 31, 2017). A total of 207 different newly initiated, scheduled nocturnal neuroactive medication orders were written (melatonin agonist 101 [48.8%], antipsychotic 80 [38.6%], antidepressant 17 [8.2%], benzodiazepine 9 [4.3%]) in 189 (9.7%) of the 1,955 patients. Among the 1,553 nights, the 189 patients spent in the ICU, a scheduled nocturnal neuroactive medication was administered on 1,103 (71%), an "as needed" nocturnal neuroactive medication was solely administered on 183 (11.8%), delirium occurred on 736 (47.4%), and nurses were twice as likely as physicians (28.8% vs 11.4%; p < 0.0001) to document a note about sleep quality. Among the 69.8% of patients discharged to the floor, and the 64.5% from the hospital, the scheduled nocturnal neuroactive medication was continued in 85.6% and 87.3%, respectively. Scheduled nocturnal neuroactive medication initiation is common, often continued beyond hospital discharge, and poorly documented.