ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The timing and clinical correlates of symptom change following antipsychotic treatment were examined in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia. METHOD: The subjects were 36 first-episode schizophrenic patients who had received minimal or no neuroleptics and 34 patients with chronic illness whose neuroleptics had been withdrawn. They were followed for 2 years and assessed with the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Treatment decisions during follow-up were made clinically by the treating physicians. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, both the neuroleptic-naive and previously treated patients showed significant improvement in positive symptoms (52% and 44% reductions from baseline, respectively). The previously treated but not the neuroleptic-naive patients also showed a significant reduction in negative symptoms (19% from baseline). A longer duration of illness before baseline assessment and inconsistent treatment during follow-up were independently associated with poorer treatment outcome in terms of positive symptoms in both groups. There were no significant changes on the outcome measures in either group after the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that maximum symptomatic improvement occurs within the first 6 months of treatment and that disease progression may blunt treatment efficacy in both first-episode and chronic schizophrenia.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Chronic Disease , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Patient Compliance , Probability , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenic Psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence, clinical correlates, and outcome of the deficit syndrome were determined for 70 patients ascertained in their first episode of schizophrenia and then followed through their recovery. METHODS: Patients were treated in a standardized manner and underwent baseline assessments of symptoms and adverse effects that were repeated at intervals throughout their inpatient and subsequent outpatient course. Forty-seven patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months after remission of their positive symptoms, allowing for an assessment of their deficit syndrome status. RESULTS: Using modified criteria of Carpenter et al. for the deficit syndrome, the authors found that two patients (4%) met all criteria for the deficit syndrome, nine (19%) had deficit symptoms (questionable deficit state), and 36 (77%) had no deficit symptoms. When patients who had not fully remitted or had remitted for less than 6 months were included, seven (10%) met deficit syndrome criteria, 11 (16%) had deficit symptoms, and 52 (74%) had no deficit symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the deficit syndrome in first-episode schizophrenia varies depending on the criteria used and is lower than that previously described in more chronic patient samples. Patients without deficit symptoms had better premorbid functioning and a better global outcome than patients with deficit symptoms.
Subject(s)
Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adult , Age Factors , Chronic Disease , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prevalence , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/classification , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The effects of apomorphine and methylphenidate on thought disorder, as measured by the Thought Disorder Index, in schizophrenic patients and in normal controls were evaluated. Methylphenidate, but not apomorphine, increased thought disorder in patients. Neither drug significantly increased thought disorder in controls.
Subject(s)
Apomorphine/pharmacology , Dopamine/physiology , Methylphenidate/pharmacology , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Schizophrenic Psychology , Thinking/drug effects , Adult , Brain/drug effects , Brain/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Synaptic Transmission/drug effects , Synaptic Transmission/physiology , Thinking/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the potential effect of duration of untreated illness on outcome in a group of first-episode schizophrenic patients. METHOD: Seventy patients with schizophrenia diagnosed according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria entered the study and were followed for up to 3 years. All patients received standardized treatment and uniform assessments both during the acute phase of their illness and throughout the follow-up period. Outcome was measured in terms of time to remission of acute psychotic symptoms as well as degree of symptom remission. RESULTS: The mean duration of psychotic symptoms before initial treatment was 52 weeks, preceded by a substantial prepsychotic period. According to survival analysis, duration of illness before treatment was found to be significantly associated with time to remission as well as with level of remission. The effect of duration of illness on outcome remained significant when diagnosis and gender variables, themselves associated with outcome, were controlled in a regression analysis. Duration of illness was not correlated with age at onset, mode of onset, premorbid adjustment, or severity of illness at entry into the study. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of psychosis before treatment may be an important predictor of outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Acute psychotic symptoms could reflect an active morbid process which, if not ameliorated by neuroleptic drug treatment, may result in lasting morbidity. Further implications of these findings are discussed.