Benefits of complementary therapy with insulin aspart versus human regular insulin in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Absorption rates of the phosphate-buffered insulin analogs aspart, lispro, and glulisine prevail over that of regular human insulin. The aim of this prospective observational open-label controlled study was to compare the effects of aspart and human regular insulin resulting from their sequential long-lasting routine administration in small preprandial boluses to individuals with type 2 diabetes according to identical algorithms. METHODS: Fifty-seven individuals with type 2 diabetes 64.0 +/- 1.29 (mean +/- SE) years old with diabetes' duration of 12.4 +/- 1.06 years, treated with human regular insulin for 5.2 +/- 0.44 years, and a serum C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.10 nmol/L were enrolled into the study. Following two checkups performed in the course of the 364 +/- 17.9-day baseline period, human regular insulin was replaced with aspart in equivalent boluses, and two checkups in the course of 330 +/- 11.1-day sequential period were performed. The control group consisted of 17 individuals with type 2 diabetes 68.4 +/- 2.36 years old with diabetes' duration of 9.9 +/- 1.57 years, treated with insulin for 4.2 +/- 0.57 years, and a C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.11 nmol/L. Data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS version 10.1. (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Following the switch from human regular insulin to aspart, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.4 +/- 0.23% at baseline to 7.9 +/- 0.17% (P = 0.031), and thereafter to 7.5 +/- 0.20% (P < 0.001), while plasma glucose concentrations in 10-point profiles, daily insulin dose (37.1 +/- 1.39 IU/day), body mass index (BMI) (30.5 +/- 0.82 kg/m(2)), and frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes did not change (P > 0.05). Patients quote satisfaction was good. No adverse events were recorded. In the control group, no significant change of baseline HbA1c (8.4 +/- 0.54%), insulin dose (33.1 +/- 3.17 IU/day), and BMI (32.1 +/- 1.12 kg/m(2)) was found. CONCLUSION: Aspart appears to be more effective than human regular insulin for complementary insulin treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Benefits of insulin aspart vs phosphate-buffered human regular insulin in persons with type 1 Diabetes treated by means of an insulin pump.

UNLABELLED: Absorption rates of phosphate buffered insulin analogs aspart and lispro prevail over regular human insulin. However, insulin aspart has not been widely used. The aim of this open controlled clinical study is to compare the metabolic effects of insulin aspart and phosphate buffered insulin when both are used in insulin pumps according to the identical algorithms. METHODS: Twenty one persons aged 39.9 +/- 2.89 (mean +/- SE) years (y) with type 1 diabetes mellitus duration of 17.9 +/- 2.21 y treated by an insulin pump for 4.3 +/- 0.53 y (at least 3 months), educated in self monitoring, entered the study. Mean plasma glucose, rates of hypo- and hyperglycaemias from the glucometer memory and other data from the first 256 +/- 19.97 days period with regular human insulin (check-up 1 and 2) and consequent 364 +/- 8.78 days long period with insulin aspart (check-up 3 and 4) were compared (paired t-test). Replacement of human regular insulin with insulin aspart after two check-ups was the only change in the treatment of diabetes. No special therapeutic education or training was made during the study. RESULTS: In persons with type 1 diabetes treated by an insulin pump with insulin aspart, despite the lower daily dose of insulin aspart vs human regular insulin, the HbA1c decreased; the frequency of hypo- and hyperglycaemias and the BMI did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin analog aspart appears to be more effective for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion than regular human insulin.