Concentration-QT modelling of the novel DHFR inhibitor P218 in healthy male volunteers.

AIMS: Given the increasing emergence of drug resistance in Plasmodium, new antimalarials are urgently required. P218 is an aminopyridine that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase being developed as a malaria chemoprotective drug. Assessing the effect of new compounds on cardiac intervals is key during early drug development to determine their cardiac safety. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study evaluated the effect of P218 on electrocardiographic parameters following oral administration of seven single-ascending doses up to 1000 mg in 56 healthy volunteers. Participants were randomized to treatment or placebo at a 3:1 ratio. P218 was administered in the fasted state with standardized lunch served 4 hours after dosing. 12-lead ECGs were recorded in triplicate at regular intervals on the test day, and at 48, 72, 120, 168, 192 and 240 hours thereafter. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluations were collected at similar time points. Concentration-effect modelling was used to assess the effect of P218 and its metabolites on cardiac intervals. RESULTS: Concentration-effect analysis showed that P218 does not prolong the QTcF, J-Tpeak or TpTe interval at all doses tested. No significant changes in QRS or PR intervals were observed. Two-sided 90% confidence intervals of subinterval effects of P218 and its metabolites were consistently below the regulatory concern threshold for all doses. Study sensitivity was confirmed by significant shortening of QTcF after a meal. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of P218 up to 1000 mg does not prolong QTcF and does not significantly change QRS or PR intervals, suggesting low risk for drug-induced proarrhythmia.

Effects of the Fluoroquinolones Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin on the QT Subintervals: Sex Differences in Ventricular Repolarization.

Women are associated with longer electrocardiographic QT intervals and increased proarrhythmic risks of QT-prolonging drugs. The purpose of this study was to characterize the differences in cardiac electrophysiology between moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in men and women and to assess the balance of inward and outward currents through the analysis of QT subintervals. Data from 2 TQT studies were used to investigate the impact of moxifloxacin (400 mg) and levofloxacin (1000 and 1500 mg) on QT subintervals using algorithms for measurement of J-Tpeak and Tpeak -Tend intervals. Concentration-effect analyses were performed to establish potential relationships between the ECG effects and the concentrations of the 2 fluoroquinolones. Moxifloxacin was shown to be a more potent prolonger of QT interval corrected by Fredericia (QTcF) and had a pronounced effect on J-Tpeak c. Levofloxacin had little effect on J-Tpeak c. For moxifloxacin, the concentration-effect modeling showed a greater effect for women on QTcF and J-Tpeak c, whereas for levofloxacin the inverse was true: women had smaller QTcF and J-Tpeak c effects. The different patterns in repolarization after administration of both drugs suggested a sex difference, which may be related to the combined IKs and IKr inhibitory properties of moxifloxacin versus IKr suppression only of levofloxacin. The equipotent inhibition of IKs and IKr appears to affect women more than men. Sex hormones are known to influence cardiac ion channel expression and differences in QT duration. Differences in IKr and IKs balances, influenced by sex hormones, may explain the results. These results support the impact of sex differences on the cardiac safety assessment of drugs.