Fast-track surgery in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: basic principles.

Fast-track surgery describes innovative treatment concepts ensuring a faster convalescence phase. The aim of this study was to allow hospital discharge 3 days after surgery without additional complications in patients receiving LRPE for localized prostate cancer. Twenty-five patients each were randomized in the study groups to verify if a fast-track regimen could be transferred into clinical routine. The perioperative data, early complications, hospital stay as well as readmission rate were analyzed. The mean postoperative stay was 3.6 days in the fast-track group versus 6.7 days in the conventional group. The overall complications were significantly less in the fast-track procedure. The readmission rate was low and not significant. Patients receiving an LRPE benefit from a suitable fast-track concept. The postoperative hospital stay could be shortened nearly by half with a significantly decreased overall complication rate. Thus, fast-track concepts might contribute to saving resources in the long term. However, more evidence based on larger prospective trials is needed to achieve optimal quality of life for patients perioperatively.

[Ten years of laparoscopic living kidney donation. From an extravagant to a routine procedure]. / 10 Jahre laparoskopische Lebendnierenspende. Von Rarität zu Routine.

Ten years ago the first laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LDN) was performed. Today, LDN is a routine operation in many US-American transplantation centers and an increasing number of centers in Europe are practicing LDN. In this article the different aspects of LDN for donor, kidney, recipient and operating surgeon are evaluated. We performed a literature research concerning LDN and the different aspects. Our own experience, as the largest LDN center in Germany, is part of the evaluation. Laparoscopic extraction of a kidney from a living donor is as safe for the donor as the open approach. At the same time, LDN offers multiple advantages like reduced pain and shorter convalescence. For the donated kidney and the recipient no disadvantages occur from the laparoscopic technique, as long as special intra- and perioperative demands are met. For the operating surgeon multiple developments have expanded the technical armentarium. LDN is safe for donor, recipient and kidney. Central issue of an optimal LDN is sufficient experience with laparoscopic urological techniques.

[Urological evaluation and follow-up of the kidney transplant patient]. / Urologische Betreuung von Patienten vor und nach Nierentransplantation.

Patients with end-stage renal disease awaiting kidney transplantation require regular urological evaluation. The urologist's main task is early diagnosis and treatment of genitourinary malignancies and evaluation of the lower urinary tract. Furthermore, urologists are often confronted with the question of whether or not to perform pretransplant urological surgery, i.e., native nephrectomy for polycystic kidney disease. Urological care after kidney transplantation involves diagnosis and treatment of ureteral complications, malignancies, lower urinary tract symptoms, and last but not least erectile dysfunction, which has a prevalence of 20-50% among kidney transplant recipients. For the evaluation and follow-up of the living kidney donor, international guidelines have been developed in recent years to also help the urologist to perform a correct evaluation and follow-up of the kidney donor.

Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy in Germany: impact on donor health-related quality of life and willingness to donate.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LDN) offers multiple advantages to the donor. Since 1999 LDN has become the only surgical approach for living kidney donation in our department. To our knowledge a donor health-related quality of life (QoL) has not yet been performed with standardized and validated questionnaires to compare laparoscopic with open nephrectomy. We therefore performed a study with two questionnaires (SF-36/GBB-24) and one set of open questions for all donors in our department. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent out to all donors between 1983 and 2001 with at least a 1-year follow-up. To exclude a bias a maximum response rate was sought; donors who did not answer were recontacted as well as their recipients or their physicians to motivate them for participation. RESULTS: The response rate was (89.8%). Except for less limb pain in the laparoscopy group, no difference could be detected for donors QoL with respect to the surgical method. Willingness to donate again was not affected by the surgical method. Nevertheless if asked again today, most donors want laparoscopic kidney retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: Donors health-related QoL is not affected by the surgical method when queried retrospectively. Nevertheless, most donors today would favor laparoscopy, if they could chose again. How laparoscopy affects a reluctant donor to step forward must be determined in a prospective study.

[Improvement of hemostasis in laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy with gelatin thrombin matrix (FloSeal)]. / Verbesserung der Hämostase bei laparoskopischen und offenen Teilnephrektomien durch Gelatine-Thrombin-Matrix (FloSeal).

Long-term follow-up studies have demonstrated that effective local tumor control and long-term tumor-free progression rates can be achieved by nephron-sparing surgery. However, hemostasis is a major issue and the lack of effective means of hemostasis has limited a wider use of the laparoscopic approach to nephron-sparing surgery. Between January 2001 and August 2002, a total of 36 patients with renal cell carcinomas were treated by partial nephrectomies using a two-component tissue sealant (FloSeal). The median age was 55.2 years (range: 34-71 years). Follow-up time was 1-18 months (median: 5.5 months). The tumor diameter ranged from 2 to 5 cm (median: 2.9 cm). Open retroperitoneal surgery was performed in 17 cases and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 19 cases. The two-component tissue sealant (consisting of a gelatin matrix with granular and thrombin components) was applied after resection of the tumor and before perfusion of the kidney. The following parameters were recorded: (1) time until complete hemostasis was achieved, (2) decrease in postoperative hemoglobin level, (3) postoperative bleeding, and (4) presence or absence of a perirenal hematoma 24 h and 10 days postoperatively by ultrasound. After application of the tissue sealant for 1-2 min to the moist resection site, hemostasis was immediate in all cases. During the laparoscopic partial nephrectomies, a laparoscopic applicator was used that avoided wasting the tissue sealant within the dead space of the instrument. When reperfusion of the kidney was established, hemostasis was maintained. The decrease in postoperative hemoglobin level ranged from 0.3 to 1.2 points (median: 0.8 points). None of the patients required blood transfusions. There were no cases of postoperative bleeding. An ultrasound examination 24 h and 10 days postoperatively demonstrated the absence of a significant perirenal hematoma. The two-component tissue sealant FloSeal provided immediate and durable hemostasis in open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. The tissue sealant may provide a tool to expand the possibilities of laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery.

[Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: indications, techniques, and oncological outcome]. / Die laparoskopische transperitoneale Tumornephrektomie. Indikation, Technik und onkologisches Outcome.

Renal cell carcinoma is likely to become one of the most important indications for laparoscopic surgery worldwide. The laparoscopic technique combines the benefits of the minimally invasive approach with established surgical principles. In our institution the laparoscopic transperitoneal approach with intact specimen extraction has become the standard technique for radical nephrectomies. We report the indications, techniques, and oncological outcome in a single center experience in 100 cases. The mean tumor size was 5.9 cm (range: 2-11 cm), the blood loss was 220 ml, and the mean surgical time was 211 min, including the learning curves of five surgeons. Histological findings were pT1 in 66 (66%), pT2 in 11 (11%), and pT3 in 19 (19%) patients with an increasing tumor size according to the experience of the surgeons. In four cases (4%) histology did not prove malignant disease. Positive lymph nodes were detected in three cases (3%) and surgical margins were negative for tumor in all patients. To date 61 patients were available for follow-up; patients with primary metastatic disease were excluded from this analysis. Follow-up was between 1 and 30 months with an average of 12.9 months. Progressive disease occurred in two cases in patients with pT3G3 tumors. No cases of local recurrence or port metastasis occurred during observation. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a routine, effective treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Our follow-up data up to 30 months confirm the effectiveness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in terms of surgical principles and oncological outcome.