Is the insertion of drains after uncomplicated thyroid surgery always necessary?

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the necessity of drainage after uncomplicated thyroid surgery. METHODS: The subjects were 135 patients who underwent thyroid surgery between September 2002 and February 2004. The patients were randomized into two groups according to whether drains were inserted at the time of surgery. Group 1 consisted of 68 patients with drains and group 2 consisted of 67 patients without drains. The indications for surgery, procedures performed, local complications (such as infection, seroma, and bleeding or hematoma), necessity for reoperation, and hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: There were 110 (81.5%) women and 25 (18.5%) men, with a median age of 46.9 +/- 12.5 years. The mean hospital stay was 2.6 +/- 1.0 days in group 1 and 1.3 +/- 0.7 days in group 2 (P = 0.001). Local complications developed in five (7.3%) patients from group 1, as wound infections in two (2.9%), seroma in one (1.5%), and hemorrhage in two (2.9%); and in two (3%) patients from group 2, as seroma in one (1.5%) and hematoma in one (1.5%). Both of the group 1 patients with postoperative hemorrhage required reoperation within 8 h after initial surgery. The hematoma in the group 2 patient was treated successfully with needle aspiration. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the routine use of drains may be abandoned in uncomplicated thyroid surgery, since serious postoperative bleeding rarely occurs and hematomas can be treated by needle aspiration if drains have not been placed. Furthermore, the use of drains prolongs hospital stay and increases the risk of infection.

Noninvasive management strategy in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND: Non-operative management in abdominal injuries may reduce non-therapeutic laparatomies without increasing mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a recently used non-invasive management strategy, in trauma patients in our institution. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. The sixty-three patients (50 males; 13 females; range 8 to 61 years) with abdominal injuries who were unstable during their admissions to our institution between July 1st, 2000 and July 1st, 2001 (the first year of the NIMS implementation) were identified and divided into three groups according to the presence or absence of surgical intervention and the timing of the operation. RESULTS: There were 63 blunt abdominal trauma patients who were unstable during admission. Patients in Group 1 (n=14) and Group 2 (n=10) had urgent laparotomy during the resuscitation therapy or after a median observation period of 7 hours (range, 2 to 20). Group 3 patients (n=39) did not require surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Most of the trauma patients who respond to initial fluid replacement do not require surgery. Close monitoring and repeated abdominal examinations (NIMS) can be the main criteria for surgical intervention, although they are not the most reliable techniques in the diagnosis of solid organ injuries in all patients and of hollow organ injuries in conscious patients.