ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of direct oral anticoagulants following radical cystectomy for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. We compared the experience of those who received venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following a robot-assisted radical cystectomy with either a direct oral anticoagulant or enoxaparin. METHODS: Medical records of 66 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy between July 2017 and May 2020 at a single academic institution were reviewed retrospectively. Patients received extended prophylaxis with either a direct oral anticoagulant or enoxaparin before or following surgical discharge. Venous thromboembolic events and complications resulting in emergency department visits and readmissions were reviewed over a 90-day postoperative period. RESULTS: A total of 4 venous thromboembolic events within 90 days of surgery were observed. Among patients taking enoxaparin, 5% (2/37) developed a deep vein thrombosis and 3% (1/37) developed a pulmonary embolism. Among patients taking direct oral anticoagulants, 3% (1/29) developed a deep vein thrombosis. Zero patients in the enoxaparin group and 3% (1/29) of patients in the direct oral anticoagulant group experienced bleeding that required an emergency department visit. CONCLUSION: Direct oral anticoagulants performed comparably to enoxaparin in this feasibility study following robot-assisted radical cystectomy in 66 patients. No significant differences in the number of venous thromboembolisms or bleeding complications were observed. These data encourage future studies and support the prospect of direct oral anticoagulants as a potentially suitable oral alternative to injectable low molecular weight heparins for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following radical cystectomy.
