Synthesis and crystal structure of 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridinium dioxido(pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylato-κ³O²,N,O6)vanadate(V) and its conversion to nanostructured V2O5.

2-Amino-3-hydroxypyridinium dioxido(pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylato-κ(3)O(2),N,O(6))vanadate(V), (C5H7N2O)[V(C7H3NO4)O2] or [H(amino-3-OH-py)][VO2(dipic)], (I), was prepared by the reaction of VCl3 with dipicolinic acid (dipicH2) and 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine (amino-3-OH-py) in water. The compound was characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and X-ray structure analysis, and consists of an anionic [VO2(dipic)](-) complex and an H(amino-3-OH-py)(+) counter-cation. The V(V) ion is five-coordinated by one O,N,O'-tridentate dipic dianionic ligand and by two oxide ligands. Thermal decomposition of (I) in the presence of polyethylene glycol led to the formation of nanoparticles of V2O5. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to characterize the structure and morphology of the synthesized powder.

Monomer release from nanofilled and microhybrid dental composites after bleaching.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of bleaching on elution of monomers from nanofilled and microhybrid composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 samples (5mm diameter and 3mm thickness) of each composite were prepared. After curing, half of them were randomly polished. Each group was divided into 8 subgroups and immersed in water or 10%, 20% and 30% H2O2 for 3 or 8 hours. Eluted Bis-GMA (Bis-phenol A Glycidyl Dimethacrylate), TEGDMA (Triethyleneglycol Dimethacrylate), UDMA (Urethane Dimethacrylate) and BisEMA (Bis-phenol A ethoxylate Dimethacrylate) were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography and the results were analyzed by univariate ANOVA and t-test (P<0.05). RESULTS: Bleach significantly increased the overall release of monomers (P<0.001); TEGDMA was released more than Bis-GMA (P<0.001). Supreme released more TEGDMA compared to Z250 (P<0.001). Bleaching increased the release of this monomer (P<0.001). Increasing both the concentration of H2O2, and the immersion time, increased the release of TEGDMA (P<0.001). Polishing had no effect on release of this monomer (P=0.952). Supreme released more Bis-GMA than Z250 (P=0.000). The more concentrated H2O2 caused more elution of Bis-GMA (P= 0.003); while the effect of immersion time was not significant (P=0.824). Polishing increased the release of Bis-GMA (P=0.001). Neither the type of composite nor Bleaching had any effect on release of UDMA (P=0.972) and (P=0.811) respectively. Immersion duration increased the release of UDMA (P=0.002), as well as polishing (P=0.024). CONCLUSION: Bleaching increased the release of monomers. Nanofilled composites released more monomer than the microfilled.

Enamel thickness after preparation of tooth for porcelain laminate.

OBJECTIVE: In this investigation the thickness of enamel in the gingival, middle, and incisal thirds of the labial surface of the anterior teeth were measured regarding preparation of the teeth for porcelain laminate veneers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Part one, 20 extracted intact human maxillary central and lateral incisors ten of each were selected. The teeth were imbedded in autopolimerize acrylic resin. Cross section was preformed through the midline of the incisal, middle and cervical one-third of the labial surface of the teeth. The samples were observed under reflected stereomicroscope and the thickness of enamel was recorded. Part II, the effect of different types of preparation on dentin exposure was evaluated. Thirty maxillary central incisor teeth were randomly divided into two groups: A: Knife-edge preparation. B: Chamfer preparation. All samples were embedded in autopolimerize acrylic resin using a silicon mold. The samples were cut through the midline of the teeth. The surface of the samples were polished and enamel and dentin were observed under the stereomicroscope. RESULTS: Data were analyzed by ANOVA-one way test. The results of this study showed that the least enamel thickness in the central incisor was 345 and in lateral incisor is 235 µ this thickness is related to the one-third labial cervical area. Maximum thickness in maxillary central and lateral incisors in the one-third labial incisal surface was 1260 µ and 1220µ, respectively. In the second part of the study, the tendency of dentinal exposure was shown with the chamfer preparation, but no dentinal exposure was found in the knife-edge preparation. The differences between groups were significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The knowledge of enamel thickness in different part of labial surface is very important. The thickness of enamel in the gingival area does not permit a chamfer preparation. The knife edge preparation is preferable in gingival area.

HPLC analysis of eluted monomers from two composite resins cured with LED and halogen curing lights.

This study investigated the leaching of monomers (Bis-GMA and TEGDMA) from nano-hybrid (Filtek Supreme) and flowable (Filtek Flow) dental composite resins cured with LED or conventional halogen curing lights, and immersed in saliva or water for 24 h. Nine disc specimens were made for each experimental group. After the polymerization process, the specimens were immersed in either water or saliva and incubated at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Eluted Bis-GMA and TEGDMA monomers were detected using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA (p = 0.05) and the independent samples t test. TEGDMA (53.15-1 microg/L) was leached from the resins at a higher level than Bis-GMA (28-0.5 microg/L) (p < 0.01), regardless of the affecting factors: composite type, solvent (media) and type of curing light. In general, Filtek Flow resin released more TEGDMA than Filtek Supreme (p < 0.05), but the Supreme resin released more Bis-GMA than TEGDMA (p < 0.05). Halogen light induced greater monomer elution than LED light immersion in water. Saliva released more TEGDMA than water (p < 0.05). We conclude that (1) total leached TEGDMA was higher than total Bis-GMA, (2) saliva and halogen light (lower intensity than LED) leached more monomers from the resins, and (3) the flowable composite resin leached more TEGDMA than the nano-hybrid.