Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Adv Med Sci ; 69(1): 139-146, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428587

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare High Carbohydrates Low Fat (HCLF) and Low Carbohydrate High Fat (LCHF) diets in terms of changes in body composition and maximal strength. PATIENTS/METHODS: The study involved 48 men aged 25 â€‹± â€‹2.5, divided into two groups, one of which (n â€‹= â€‹23) was following the LCHF diet and the other (n â€‹= â€‹25) the HCLF diet. Both groups performed the same resistance training protocol for 15 weeks. Maximal strength in squat, bench press and deadlift was assessed pre- and post-intervention. Measurements of selected body circumferences and tissue parameters were made using the multifunctional, multi-frequency, direct bioelectric impedance InBody 770 analyzer from InBody Co., Ltd (Cerritos, California, USA). The team with the necessary qualifications and experience in research performed all the measurements and maintained participants' oversight throughout the entire length of the study. RESULTS: Both nutritional approaches were effective in terms of reducing body fat mass. The HCLF group achieved greater skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Significant decreases in body circumferences, especially in the abdominal area, were observed for both dietary approaches. Maximal strength significantly increased in the HCLF group and decreased in the LCHF group. CONCLUSION: Holistic analysis of the results led to the conclusion that both dietary approaches may elicit positive adaptations in body composition. The two approaches constitute useful alternatives for both recreational exercisers and physique athletes with body composition goals.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Muscle Strength , Resistance Training , Humans , Male , Resistance Training/methods , Adult , Muscle Strength/physiology , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Diet, High-Fat , Young Adult
2.
Nutrients ; 14(9)2022 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35565718

ABSTRACT

The problem addressed in this study is the appropriateness of using different pre-training supplementation strategies and their ability to improve training performance and psychological measures. The aim of the study is the evaluation of the effectiveness of a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement (MIPS) containing beta-alanine, L-citrulline malate, arginine alpha-ketoglutarate, L-taurine, L-tyrosine and caffeine compared to an exact dosage of anhydrous caffeine in bench press strength endurance, feeling scale (FS), felt arousal scale (FAS) and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE). A group of fifteen resistance-trained males, weighing 83.92 ± 8.95 kg and having an average of 5.6 ± 3.38 years of training experience, tested their bench press 10 repetition maximum (79.01 ± 12.13). In a cross-over manner, they participated in two sessions where they were blinded to the order of supplementation they were given: either a MIPS including caffeine or caffeine alone. They completed the bench press strength endurance test with pre- and post-training psychological assessments containing FS, FAS and sRPE. Bench press repetition volume was greater after anhydrous caffeine than MIPS supplementation with no difference in psychological measures. These results indicate that MIPS supplementation is less ergogenic and cost effective than caffeine alone.


Subject(s)
Caffeine , Resistance Training , Caffeine/pharmacology , Cross-Over Studies , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength , Physical Endurance , Resistance Training/methods , Single-Blind Method , Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...