Experimental study of the efficacy of linezolid alone and in combinations against experimental meningitis due to Staphylococcus aureus strains with decreased susceptibility to beta-lactams and glycopeptides.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate in vitro and in vivo efficacies of linezolid, vancomycin, and the combination of linezolid and rifampicin against two Staphylococcus aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams and one of them also to glycopeptides. METHODS: In vitro killing curves and a rabbit model: Meningitis was induced by intracisternal inoculation of 10(8) CFU/ml of each strain. Five hours later (0 h), rabbits were randomly assigned to control or to therapeutic groups. CSF bacterial counts, lactate and protein concentrations, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. RESULTS: In vivo: linezolid and its combination with rifampicin reduced bacterial concentrations at 24 h, median cfu/mL 4.85 vs 3.87 (p < 0.05) for linezolid and 5.02 vs 4.21 (p < 0.05) for linezolid + rifampicin, against the glycopeptide intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strain and improved inflammatory parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the need for more experimental data, our results suggest that linezolid and its combinations could be considered as a potential alternative in difficult-to-treat CNS infections and especially in those due to GISA strains and deserve more studies.

Contribution of capsular and clonal types and beta-lactam resistance to the severity of experimental pneumococcal meningitis.

We used a rabbit model to assess the effects of capsular serotype, genetic background and beta-lactam resistance on the course and severity of experimental meningitis. Meningitis was induced by five pneumococcal strains belonging to five different clones with known invasive potential: two serotype 3 strains (ST260(3) and Netherlands(3)-31 clones) and three serotype 23F strains with different beta-lactam susceptibility patterns (Spain(23F)-1 clone, Tennessee(23F)-4 clone and a double locus variant of the Tennessee(23F)-4 clone). Major differences in secondary bacteremia and mortality rates were observed between serotypes 3 and 23F, as were divergences in the CSF lactate, protein and lipoteichoic-teichoic acid concentrations. Minor differences in the CSF-induced inflammatory response were found among strains belonging to the same serotype. Our results suggest that capsular serotype might be the main factor determining the course and severity of pneumococcal meningitis and genetic background contributes to a lesser extent. The acquisition of beta-lactam resistance does not reduce the virulence of the invasive clones. Since five strains belonging to two serotypes were studied, our findings have to be confirmed with other pneumococcal serotypes.

Evaluation of fosfomycin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone or vancomycin in an experimental model of meningitis caused by two strains of cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: To study the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of fosfomycin, alone and in combination with ceftriaxone or vancomycin, against two strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae: HUB 2349 (fosfomycin and ceftriaxone, MICs 16 and 2 mg/L) and ATCC 51916 (MICs 4 and 32 mg/L). METHODS: Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics data were collected from the study of eight infected animals after a single intravenous dose of 300 mg/kg of fosfomycin. Time-kill curves were plotted using CSF antibiotic concentrations achievable clinically. In the rabbit model, we studied the efficacy and effects on inflammation of treatment with fosfomycin 1200 mg/kg/day, ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg/day and vancomycin 30 mg/kg/day, over 26 h. RESULTS: Fosfomycin peak level in serum was 324.48 +/- 102.1 mg/L at 0.5 h; CSF penetration was 49.2%. Time-kill curves showed that fosfomycin was bactericidal against the ATCC 51916 strain and that the addition of fosfomycin to ceftriaxone or vancomycin was synergic against the HUB 2349 strain. Resistance to fosfomycin was detected both when fosfomycin was studied alone and in combination. In the rabbit model, fosfomycin showed bactericidal activity only against the ATCC 51916 strain. Combinations of fosfomycin with ceftriaxone or vancomycin were bactericidal against both strains; they improved efficacy and decreased CSF inflammatory parameters over monotherapies, without showing statistical differences in comparison with the combination of ceftriaxone and vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Fosfomycin in combination with ceftriaxone or vancomycin appeared to be effective for the treatment of experimental cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. These combinations are possible alternatives in cases of allergy or intolerance to first-line drugs or in rare meningitis caused by highly cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci.

Evaluation of ceftriaxone, vancomycin and rifampicin alone and combined in an experimental model of meningitis caused by highly cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 51916.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of ceftriaxone, vancomycin and rifampicin alone and combined against Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 51916 (MIC of ceftriaxone: 32 mg/L). METHODS: In vitro killing curves were performed with clinically achievable CSF antibiotic concentrations. In the rabbit model of pneumococcal meningitis, we studied the efficacy of and effects on inflammation of treatment with ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg/day, vancomycin 30 mg/kg/day and rifampicin 15 mg/kg/day, alone and combined, over a 26 h period. RESULTS: Time-kill curves showed that vancomycin was bactericidal, and ceftriaxone and rifampicin produced a bacteriostatic effect. An additive effect was observed when combinations of ceftriaxone plus vancomycin were studied at subinhibitory concentrations. Emergence of resistance to rifampicin was detected both when rifampicin was studied alone and when combined with ceftriaxone or vancomycin. In the rabbit meningitis model, ceftriaxone was bacteriostatic, whereas rifampicin and vancomycin were bactericidal at 24 h. Although not synergistic, the combinations of ceftriaxone plus vancomycin or rifampicin, and vancomycin plus rifampicin, improved the efficacy of any antibiotic tested alone--all combinations were bactericidal from 6 h--and significantly decreased inflammatory parameters in CSF compared with control and ceftriaxone groups. CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin, and vancomycin plus rifampicin appeared to be effective in the therapy of experimental pneumococcal meningitis caused by highly cephalosporin-resistant strains such as ATCC 51916. Our results provide an experimental basis for using these combinations as empirical therapy for pneumococcal meningitis, regardless of the degree of cephalosporin resistance of the causative strain.

Experimental study on the efficacy of combinations of glycopeptides and beta-lactams against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides.

OBJECTIVES: The combination of glycopeptides and beta-lactams has been proposed as an alternative therapy against infections due to Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, though its role is still controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy (decrease in bacterial concentration after 24 h therapy) of these combinations both in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Four strains of S. aureus with different glycopeptide susceptibility (MICs of vancomycin from 1 to 8 mg/L) were used. In vitro experiments were performed by means of time-kill curves while we used the mouse peritonitis model for in vivo evaluation. RESULTS: Combinations of glycopeptides and beta-lactams showed synergy in in vitro time-kill curves against the four staphylococcal strains, the highest efficacy being detected against the glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strain (MIC = 8 mg/L) (Deltalog 24 h = -3.19 cfu/mL for vancomycin at 1/2 x MIC and oxacillinat 1/64 x MIC versus -0.56 cfu/mL for vancomycin alone at 1/2 x MIC). On the other hand, no significant increase in efficacy was observed in vivo in the experimental model. The efficacy of the combinations decreased in correlation to the decreasing susceptibility of the strains to glycopeptides, showing only residual activity against the GISA strain (Deltalog 24 h = -1.42 cfu/mL for vancomycin and cloxacillin versus -1.22 cfu/mL for vancomycin). CONCLUSIONS: In the in vivo setting we were unable to demonstrate the synergism between glycopeptides and beta-lactams observed in vitro; nor did combinations show antagonism against any of the strains. Though the usefulness of these combinations cannot be totally ruled out in highly specific clinical conditions, it seems unlikely that they will provide a serious therapeutic alternative in most hGISA and GISA infections in the coming years.