Health and medication literacy and the desire to participate in pharmacotherapy decision making - comparison of two countries.

BACKGROUND: Health and medication literacy may be important factors in the outcomes of medical treatment. Similarly, shared decision making or lack of it may influence patient's behavior and adherence to medications. OBJECTIVES: To describe health and medication literacy as well as factors associated with poor medication literacy in two different populations and secondly, to describe desire to participate in decisions concerning medications; and to assess the role of poor medication literacy in decision making. METHODS: A general population based survey in Finland (n = 8003) and in Malta (n = 2000). Health and medication literacy and the desire to participate in decision making was each measured with three statements based on the literature. Medication literacy was operationalized as understanding the instructions on package insert and ability to follow instructions on pharmacy label. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of the Finnish respondents and 16% of Maltese reported always or often having problems understanding package inserts, i.e., poor medication literacy. Males (p = 0.004) and respondents in the age group 65-79 years (p < 0.001) were more prone to report such poor medication literacy. Respondents in Finland (59%) and Malta (65%) reported wanting to discuss different treatment options with the doctor. The respective percentages (42% Finland, 57% Malta) were lower for discussing about the choice of medicine and for deciding about the medicine (36% and 43%, respectively). The desire to participate in deciding about the medicines was higher among females (p < 0.001) and Maltese respondents (p < 0.001). Also those with poor medication literacy more often (p < 0.001) expressed a desire to participate in deciding in the choice of medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Medication literacy was rather low, while desire to participate in pharmacotherapy decision making was high, especially in Malta. Overall, women tended to be more willing to participate in decision making. The desire to participate in decisions was higher among persons with low medication literacy.

Co expression of SCF and KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) suggests an autocrine/paracrine mechanism.

KIT is a tyrosine kinase receptor expressed by several tumours, which has for specific ligand the stem cell factor (SCF). KIT is the main oncogene in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), and gain-of-function KIT mutations are present in 70% of these tumours. The aim of the study was to measure and investigate the mechanisms of KIT activation in 80 KIT-positive GIST patients. KIT activation was quantified by detecting phosphotyrosine residues in Western blotting. SCF production was determined by reverse transcriptase-PCR, ELISA and/or immunohistochemistry. Primary cultures established from three GISTs were also analysed. The results show that KIT activation was detected in all cases, even in absence of KIT mutations. The fraction of activated KIT was not correlated with the mutational status of GISTs. Membrane and soluble isoforms of SCF mRNA were present in all GISTs analysed. Additionally, SCF was also detected in up to 93% of GISTs, and seen to be present within GIST cells. Likewise, the two SCF mRNA isoforms were found to be expressed in GIST-derived primary cultures. Thus, KIT activation in GISTs may in part result from the presence of SCF within the tumours.

OSHA sets final ergonomics rule.

After years of advocating for an ergonomic regulation through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), at last on November 14, 2000, the final standards were issued. The OSHA Ergonomic Standards are designed to prevent musculoskeletal injury by matching workplace conditions to job demands. This rule will provide long awaited relief to nurses in direct care who have worked for years without benefit, in most cases, of technology that could have prevented ergonomic injury.

Clinical data for use in assessing quality: lessons learned from the Texas Nurses' Association Report Card Project.

The purpose of this report is to describe the Texas Nurses' Association Report Card Project. As part of ANA's Safety and Quality Initiative, the project was designed as a feasibility study to determine whether clinically based quality indicator data could be collected in standard ways across acute care agencies in Texas. Clinicians from 12 agencies, under leadership of the professional association (Texas Nurses' Association), participated in this initial effort to reach consensus on clinical indicator definitions and on how to collect clinical data for each indicator. Data were collected for falls and injuries, bacteremias, pressure ulcers, skill mix, nursing hours per patient day, patient satisfaction (with nursing, hospital stay, education, and pain management), and nurse satisfaction. The process used is described, as well as the findings and the lessons learned. The importance of standard definitions and precise and standard primary sources for the data are emphasized for the phase II report card efforts to follow.