Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gene ; 851: 147041, 2023 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36375658

ABSTRACT

Differences in the features of aggressiveness of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) subtypes, between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are relevant characteristics. Comparing the characteristics between NMSC subtypes might help identify molecules associated with cancer metastasis and invasion. Considering these facts, the current study aimed to identify a molecular target for inhibiting skin cancer metastasis and invasion. Proteomic analysis suggested that heat shock protein 90 kDa, alpha, class B member 1 (HSP90AB1), pentaxin (PTX3), caspase-14 (CASP14), S100, actin-1, and profilin were the primary targets related to metastasis and invasion. However, after a differential expression comparison between BCC and SCC, HSP90AB1 was identified as the best target to repress metastasis and invasion. Based on molecular docking results, gallic acid (GA) was selected to inhibit HSP90AB1. A specific Hsp90ab1 siRNA targeting was designed and compared to GA. Interestingly, GA was more efficient in silencing HSP90AB1 than siRNAhsp90ab1. Hence, our data suggest that HSP90AB1 is a crucial biomarker for identifying invasion and metastasis and that its inhibition may be a viable strategy for treating skin cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Heat-Shock Proteins , Gallic Acid/pharmacology , Proteomics , Molecular Docking Simulation , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/metabolism , HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins/genetics
2.
Lasers Med Sci ; 37(9): 3527-3536, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36001245

ABSTRACT

Radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with several complications. Although photobiomodulation (PBM) has radioprotective effects in normal tissue, it could also enhance the growth of neoplastic cells. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the cellular response of oral squamous cell carcinoma with pre-exposure to low-level phototherapy before radiotherapy. SCC9, Cal-27, A431, and HaCaT cell lines were subjected to low-level light therapy and radiotherapy. The cells were treated with a single energy density (300 J/cm2) of a light-emitting diode (660 nm) prior to ionizing radiation at different doses (0, 2, 4, and 6 Gy). After 24 h, wound scratch, proliferation, clonogenic cell survival, cell death, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) analyses were performed to evaluate cell response. The cell lines pre-exposed to PBM at the analyzed dosage were radiosensitive. The treatment significantly reduced cell proliferation and clonogenic cell survival. Migration and cell death assays also revealed positive results, with the treatment group showing lower rate of migration and higher cell death than did the control group. Moreover, PBM effectively increased the intracellular levels of ROS. PBM at 300 J/cm2 is a promising radiosensitizing modality to reduce the radiation dose and avoid the intolerable side effects of radiotherapy for HNSCC, thus increasing the probability of successful treatment. However, further studies are needed to support and confirm the results.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Low-Level Light Therapy , Mouth Neoplasms , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Reactive Oxygen Species , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy
3.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 39: 102983, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35772622

ABSTRACT

Purpose This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) with 300 µmol/L of methylene blue and 8 µmol/L of curcumin on oral candidiasis patients with HNSCC undergoing treatment. Methods A two-arm, single-blind clinical trial was performed. Following verification for eligibility (n = 447), 108 patients were included in the study. The study consisted of a group that received aPDT with methylene blue (n = 57) and another that received aPDT with curcumin (n = 51). The patients rinsed their mouths with an aqueous solution of 300 µmol/L of methylene blue and 8 µmol/L of curcumin in four sessions, and then the lesion was scraped for the subsequent RT-qPCR. The primary outcome was that no cure was presented for oral candidiasis after treatment. The secondary result was reducing the number of sites affected by oral candidiasis. Results There was no difference in treatment failure evaluated by the necessity of drug prescription or Candida sp DNA quantification. However, clinically the methylene blue protocol reduced the number of infected anatomical sites compared to the curcumin protocol. Conclusion Methylene blue aPDT reduced the number of infected anatomical sites compared to curcumin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Candidiasis, Oral , Curcumin , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Photochemotherapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Candidiasis, Oral/drug therapy , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Methylene Blue/therapeutic use , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Single-Blind Method
4.
Lasers Med Sci ; 33(8): 1813-1819, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948456

ABSTRACT

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most frequent oral malignant neoplasia. As consequence of OSCC treatment, oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most common adverse effects of OSCC treatment. Currently, there is no consensus for OM treatment. The purpose of the current study was to test the combination of red and infrared low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for OM treatment. Primary culture of human fibroblast was performed to identify LLLT dose. After laboratory tests, a two-arm parallel, single-blind, controlled study was conducted. The two arms were group 1, both 660- and 808-nm wavelengths (300 J/cm2, 9 J of total energy, 100 mW, spot size 3 mm2), and group 2, only 660-nm wavelength (300 J/cm2, 9 J of total energy, 100 mW, spot size 3 mm2). Both treatments were performed twice a week. Group 1 presented a reduction of mucositis grade in comparison to group 2. Group 1 also presented reduction of analgesics prescription. But no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 were observed according to the pain scale. In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that a combination of red and infrared at a higher dose (300 J/cm2) reduced both oral mucositis grade and analgesics prescription. The effects of the combination of RT and LLLT are unclear and need more studies.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain/radiotherapy , Stomatitis/drug therapy , Stomatitis/radiotherapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fibroblasts/pathology , Fibroblasts/radiation effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...