Preliminary evidence of effectiveness of TECAR in lymphedema.

Lymphedema of the lower limbs often contributes to the mobility impairment of morbidly obese patients. Defining novel costeffective protocols is important for reducing treatment costs. The study aimed to assess if Capacitive and Resistive Energy Transfer (TECAR) can reduce edema and the minimum number of sessions needed to observe volume reduction. Forty-eight severely obese subjects (age range: 46-78 years; BMI >40 kg/m2) with bilateral lower limb lymphedema were divided into three groups undergoing either manual lymphatic drainage, pressure therapy, or TECAR, in addition to a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. They were compared to a control group composed by 12 women (age: 67.4 ± 8.9 years, BMI: 44.6 ± 4.1 Kg/m2) undergoing only the rehabilitation program. A handheld laser scanner 3D system was used for volume measurements. In addition, patients were evaluated with a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and pain/heaviness of the lower limbs with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A significant volume reduction was observed after 6 sessions of TECAR: specifically, in the whole limb (PRE: 9.7+2.8 dm3; POST: 9.4+2.8 dm3; p<0.05) and in the thigh (PRE: 3.5+1.3 dm3; POST: 3.3+1.2 dm3; p<0.05). The TUG and VAS for pain showed a significant improvement in all groups. Our preliminary results suggest that TECAR can provide a relatively early reduction of lower limb edema with improvement of patients' function and pain.

Effectiveness of in-patient rehabilitation in obesity-related orthopedic conditions.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present paper is to provide initial evidence that in-patient multidisciplinary rehabilitation is effective in minimizing the obesity-related disability and enhancing functional capacities in obese patients with motor disability. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and sixty-four obese patients with orthopedic conditions admitted to our Rehabilitation Unit for multidisciplinary rehabilitation were enrolled in this study. METHODS: At admission and discharge (after 4 weeks), the following outcome measures were computed: body weight (BW) (kg), body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor and cognitive, Obesity-related disability test (TSD-OC), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for functioning, Timed-Up-Go (TUG). Intensive rehabilitation addressed to obese patients with orthopedic conditions and motor difficulties consisted of a 4-week and 3-h daily multidisciplinary program covering nutritional, motor and psychological aspects. RESULTS: All of the outcomes measured, except the FIM cognitive score, improved significantly after in-patient rehabilitation. The obesity-specific disability scale appears sensitive to changes among groups with different grades of disability and the percentage of change does not differ among groups. Younger obese individuals generally showed to benefit more from rehabilitation interventions than the older ones. CONCLUSIONS: In-patient rehabilitation interventions appear effective in reducing both mild and severe disabilities related to obesity with orthopedic co-morbidities. This paper provides initial evidence that in-patient multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation is effective in minimizing the obesity-related disability and initial support to the indications of the Italian Ministry of Health for such rehabilitation pathway. The disability grading could help the decision making of allocating patients to appropriate rehabilitation settings.

Measuring changes after multidisciplinary rehabilitation of obese individuals.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Italian Society of Obesity developed the short-form questionnaire for Obesity-related Disabilities (TSD-OC). AIMS: To stage the degree of disability in obese patients using TSD-OC; to verify its sensitivity to change after rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: Three hundred and fifty-five adult obese individuals [body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2] undergoing rehabilitation. Exclusion criteria were severe cardiovascular or respiratory diseases, neurological and psychological conditions. Sensitivity to change of TSD-OC was evaluated in 194 patients out of the initial sample. METHODS: To define the disability levels according to TSD-OC, the method of interquartile range was applied to the initial sample. The 194 in-patients were assessed with Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Functional Visual Analogue Scale, and TSD-OC before (S0) and after 4 weeks (S1) of intensive (3 h daily) rehabilitation multidisciplinary program. Individuals were grouped according to age (1: age 30-59 yr; 2: age over 60 yr) and degree of obesity (BMI: A, 30-40 kg/m2; B, 40-50 kg/m2). RESULTS: At S1, BMI and all the clinical scores improved significantly in the whole study sample. The younger individuals with higher level of obesity showed a higher functional improvement (-51.3%). In the older subjects, improvement was not statistically different when varying BMI (A2 -13.7% vs B2 -14.6%). In the whole group, the TSD-OC improvement was statistically greater than the physical FIM gain (-25.9% vs +5.4%, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data evidenced that the TSD-OC is a sensitive measure of short-term changes in disability status of obese individuals after rehabilitation.

Subjective perception of body sway.

OBJECTIVES AND METHOD: The relation between body sway recorded through a stabilometric platform and the subjective report of steadiness was studied in 20 young and 20 elderly subjects and 20 neuropathic and 20 parkinsonian patients standing upright. The trials were performed under two stances (feet apart, feet together) and two visual conditions (eyes open, eyes closed). At the end of each trial, subjects scored their performance on a scale from 10 (complete steadiness) to 0 (fall). RESULTS: In all subjects, independently of the stance conditions, the larger the body sway the smaller the reported score. The function best fitting this relation was linear when sway was expressed on a logarithmic scale. The scoring reproducibility proved high both within and across subjects. Despite the different body sways and scores recorded under the different visual and postural conditions (eyes closed>eyes open, feet together>feet apart) in all groups of subjects and patients, the slopes of the relations between sway and score were broadly superimposable. In the normal subjects, the scores were slightly higher during eyes open than eyes closed trials for corresponding body sways. This was interpreted as a sign of perception of greater stability when vision was allowed. Parkinsonian patients swayed to a similar extent as normal subjects, and their scores were accordingly similar, both with eyes open and eyes closed. Neuropathic patients swayed to a larger extent than normal subjects, and their scores were matched appropriately. Although the slope of their relation with eyes closed was not different from that of normal subjects, with eyes open it was steeper and similar to that with eyes closed, suggesting that these patients did not feel more stable when they could take advantage of vision. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective evaluation of body sway, irrespective of stance condition, age, neuropathy, and basal ganglia disease, reflects the actual sway, and is inversely proportional to the logarithm of the sway value. The remarkable similarity of the relation between score and sway across the various groups of subjects with eyes closed indicates a common mode of sway evaluation, possibly based on integration of several sensory inputs. All groups except neuropathic patients seem to take advantage of the redundancy of the inputs. Basal ganglia integrity does not seem to have a role in the evaluation of sway.

Human stance stability improves with the repetition of the task: effect of foot position and visual condition.

The effects of repetition of quiet stance trials on body sway, recorded through a stabilometric platform, were studied in 12 normal subjects. With feet together, both with eyes open (EO) and closed (EC), a progressive shift forward of the centre of foot pressure (CFP) occurred with repetition. In addition, with EC, but not with EO, a significant progressive reduction in sway area (SA) and sway path (SP) occurred. With feet 10 cm apart, initial SA and SP values were significantly smaller than with feet together, regardless of the visual condition, but repetition of trials induced no significant effects on either position of CFP or body sway under either visual condition. Results indicate the occurrence of a learning phenomenon in this simple postural task, whereby the body shifts towards a 'safer' position with a minimum energy expenditure due to reduced corrections of sway. Forward leaning and decrease in sway are two independently-occurring processes, each possibly due to a better central integration of proprioceptive input with repetition of trials.