Improved glucometrics in people with type 1 diabetes 1 year into the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Various studies have shown a number of glycemic parameters to improve over several weeks in people with type 1 diabetes during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether and to what extent such improvement is sustained during following COVID-19 surges remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate glycemic parameters during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in people with type 1 diabetes and to determine factors associated with glycemic improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational cohort study in people with type 1 diabetes, aged ≥16 years. We compared glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) downloads between the prelockdown period and approximately 1 year thereafter. Using logistic regression analysis, we assessed associations between an HbA1c reduction of at least 0.5% (~5.5 mmol/mol) with baseline clinical characteristics and self-reported changes in psychological well-being and lifestyle behavior related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 437 participants were included. As compared with prepandemic data, 1 year after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns, HbA1c had decreased from 7.9%±1.1% (63±12 mmol/mol) to 7.5%±1.0% (59±11 mmol/mol) (p<0.001), whereas time in range increased from 55.8%±16.7% to 58.6%±16.7% (p=0.004) and time below (<3.9 mmol/L) and above (>13.9 mmol/L) range and glucose variability all decreased (all p<0.05). FGM use, higher HbA1c at baseline and current smoking were independently associated with an HbA1c decrease of at least 0.5%, whereas self-reported changes in psychological well-being and lifestyle behavior related to the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were not. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdown measures were associated with improvement in glucometrics, including HbA1c and FGM data, in individuals with type 1 diabetes, particularly in FGM users, those with higher HbA1c at baseline or current smokers.

Effect of lactate administration on cerebral blood flow during hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia, clinically reflected by the inability to timely detect hypoglycemia, affects approximately 25% of the people with type 1 diabetes. Both altered brain lactate handling and increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) during hypoglycemia appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Here we examine the effect of lactate on CBF during hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Nine people with type 1 diabetes and normal awareness of hypoglycemia underwent two hyperinsulinemic euglycemic-hypoglycemic (3.0 mmol/L) glucose clamps in a 3T MR system, once with sodium lactate infusion and once with sodium chloride infusion. Global and regional changes in CBF were determined using pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. RESULTS: Lactate (3.3±0.6 vs 0.9±0.2 mmol/L during lactate infusion vs placebo infusion, respectively) suppressed the counter-regulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia. Global CBF increased considerably in response to intravenous lactate infusion but did not further increase during hypoglycemia. Lactate also blunted the hypoglycemia-induced regional redistribution of CBF towards the thalamus. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated lactate levels enhance global CBF and blunt the thalamic CBF response during hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes, mimicking observations of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. These findings suggest that alteration of CBF associated with lactate may play a role in some aspects of the development of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03730909.

High prevalence of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia among people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: The Dutch Diabetes Pearl Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: People with type 2 diabetes on insulin are at risk for hypoglycemia. Recurrent hypoglycemia can cause impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH), and increase the risk for severe hypoglycemia. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and determinants of self-reported IAH and severe hypoglycemia in a Dutch nationwide cohort of people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Observational study of The Dutch Diabetes Pearl, a cohort of people with type 2 diabetes treated in primary, secondary and tertiary diabetes care centers. The presence of IAH and the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia in the past year, defined as an event requiring external help to recover, were assessed using the validated Dutch version of the Clarke questionnaire. In addition, clinical variables were collected including age, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, ethnicity and education. RESULTS: 2350 people with type 2 diabetes on insulin were included: 59.1% men, mean age 61.1±10.4 years, mean diabetes duration 14.8±9.2 years and 79.5% on basal-bolus therapy. A total of 229 patients (9.7%) were classified as having IAH and 742 patients (31.6%) reported severe hypoglycemia. Increased odds for IAH were found with complex insulin regimens and lower odds with having a partner and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. Severe hypoglycemia was associated with complex insulin regimens, non-Caucasian ethnicity and use of psychoactive drugs, and inversely with metformin use. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide cohort, almost one out of ten people with type 2 diabetes on insulin had IAH and >30% had a history of severe hypoglycemia in the past year.

Glucose Control, Disease Burden, and Educational Gaps in People With Type 1 Diabetes: Exploratory Study of an Integrated Mobile Diabetes App.

BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring and self-management, crucial for optimal glucose control in type 1 diabetes, requires many disease-related decisions per day and imposes a substantial disease burden on people with diabetes. Innovative technologies that integrate relevant measurements may offer solutions that support self-management, decrease disease burden, and benefit diabetes control. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate a prototype integrated mobile phone diabetes app in people with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this exploratory study, we developed an app that contained cloud-stored log functions for glucose, carbohydrates (including a library), insulin, planned exercise, and mood, combined with a bolus calculator and communication functions. Adults with diabetes tested the app for 6 weeks. We assessed the feasibility of app use, user experiences, perceived disease burden (through questionnaires), insulin dose and basal to bolus ratio, mean glucose level, hemoglobin A1c, and number of hypoglycemic events. RESULTS: A total of 19 participants completed the study, resulting in 5782 data entries. The most frequently used feature was logging blood glucose, insulin, and carbohydrates. Mean diabetes-related emotional problems (measured with the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale) scores decreased from 14.4 (SD 10.0) to 12.2 (SD 10.3; P=.04), and glucose control improved, with hemoglobin A1c decreasing from 7.9% (mean 62.3, SD 8 mmol/mol) to 7.6% (mean 59.8, SD 7 mmol/mol; P=.047). The incidence of hypoglycemic events did not change. Participants were generally positive about the app, rating it as "refreshing," and as providing structure by reinforcing insulin-dosing principles. The app revealed substantial knowledge gaps. Logged data enabled additional detailed analyses. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated mobile diabetes app has the potential to improve diabetes self-management and provide tailored educational support, which may decrease disease burden and benefit diabetes control.

The cardiovascular effects of metformin: lost in translation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In overweight patients with diabetes, treatment with metformin improves cardiovascular outcomes. This observation has fuelled the hypothesis that metformin has direct cardiovascular protective properties over and above glucose lowering. Here, we discuss the various cardiovascular effects of metformin observed in preclinical studies and recent clinical trials in patients, which fail to reproduce these findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Laboratory studies suggest that metformin limits atherosclerosis. Also, metformin consistently limits myocardial infarct size and reduces postinfarction remodeling in rodents.Confirmation of these effects in patients, however, appears difficult. In nondiabetic patients, metformin does not reduce carotid intima media thickness. In myocardial infarction patients, the effects of metformin on infarct size are inconclusive, but these studies suffer from methodological shortcomings. Finally, chronic administration of metformin does not affect postinfarction cardiac remodeling in nondiabetic patients. SUMMARY: Although recent trials in nondiabetic patients could not confirm direct effects of metformin on atherosclerosis and cardiac remodeling, an acute cardioprotective effect of metformin cannot be excluded yet. We might have to consider, though, that the beneficial effect of metformin on cardiovascular prognosis in patients with diabetes is due to its effects on glucose metabolism and body weight rather than due to pleiotropic direct cardiovascular effects.