Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
2.
J Opioid Manag ; 18(4): 291-295, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36052927

ABSTRACT

The Rocky Mountain Chapter of the Society of Hospital Medicine developed 2020 Opioid Prescribing and Treatment Guidelines for the medical inpatient, including five pathways for treating medical inpatients with pain. Ten Colorado hospitals participated in a 6-month initiative to implement the prescribing pathways, with an aim of reducing opioid prescribing by 15 percent for five commonly encountered medical conditions. Results showed 9.4 percent decrease in opioid morphine equivalent units, 3.4 percent reduction in opioid administrations, and 5.1 percent increase in alternatives to opioid administrations per patient day. Specialty-specific opioid prescribing guidance can help hospitalists change opioid prescribing behavior and should be considered in other specialties.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Humans , Inpatients , Pain
3.
Learn Health Syst ; 5(4): e10250, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34667874

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Academic health centers are poised to improve health through their clinical, education, and research missions. However, these missions often operate in silos. The authors explored stakeholder perspectives at diverse institutions to understand challenges and identify alignment strategies. METHODS: Authors used an exploratory qualitative design and thematic analysis approach with data obtained from electronic surveys sent to participants at five U.S. academic health centers (2017-18), with four different types of medical school/health system partnerships. Participants included educators, researchers, system leaders, administrators, clinical providers, resident/fellow physicians, and students. Investigators coded data using constant comparative analysis, met regularly to reconcile uncertainties, and collapsed/combined categories. RESULTS: Of 175 participants invited, 113 completed the survey (65%). Three results categories were identified. First, five higher-order themes emerged related to aligning missions, including (a) shared vision and strategies, (b) alignment of strategy with community needs, (c) tension of economic drivers, (d) coproduction of knowledge, and (e) unifying set of concepts spanning all missions. Second, strategies for each mission were identified, including education (new competencies, instructional methods, recruitment), research (shifting agenda, developing partnerships, operations), and clinical operations (delivery models, focus on patient factors/needs, value-based care, well-being). Lastly, strategies for integrating each dyadic mission pair, including research-education, clinical operations education, and research-clinical operations, were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Academic health centers are at a crossroads in regard to identity and alignment across the tripartite missions. The study's results provide pragmatic strategies to advance the tripartite missions and lead necessary change for improved patient health.

4.
MedEdPORTAL ; 16: 11064, 2020 12 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409360

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) training for fellow-level trainees, this experience is often insufficient due to lack of faculty time and expertise within fellowship training programs. We developed a centralized GME curriculum targeted to an integrated, multispecialty audience of fellow-level trainees with the goal of promoting leadership and scholarship in QIPS. Methods: The University of Colorado implemented the Fellows' Quality and Safety Academy, a three-seminar curriculum in patient safety and health systems improvement. As most participants had prior training in QIPS during medical school or residency, educational strategies emphasized application of QIPS concepts through focused didactic content review paired with small-group case-based exercises and coaching of experiential project work to promote content mastery as well as practice of leadership and scholarship strategies. Results: Since the curriculum's inception in 2017, there have been 106 participants in the Foundations in Patient Safety seminar, 49 participants in the Adverse Events Into Quality Improvement seminar, and 48 participants in the Quality in Academics seminar. These participants represented 44 separate fellowship disciplines from both adult and pediatric subspecialties. Learners reported improved attitudes and confidence and demonstrated objective knowledge acquisition across QIPS content domains. Discussion: Our pedagogical approach of centralizing QIPS training and harnessing faculty expertise to teach fellow-level trainees across specialties through interdisciplinary collaboration and interactive project-based work is an effective strategy to promote development of QIPS competencies during fellowship training.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Quality Improvement , Adult , Child , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate , Humans , Patient Safety
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 74(6): 727-735, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31540789

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines recommend delivering a continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) dose of 20 to 25mL/kg/h. However, practice patterns nationwide are highly variable; this inconsistent prescribing may lead to errors in medication dosing and increase rates of electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities. We describe an initiative to standardize CRRT practice patterns and reduce dosing variability. STUDY DESIGN: Quality improvement study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients treated with CRRT at the University of Colorado Hospital between January 2016 and October 2017. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES: An assessment of the magnitude of the variability in CRRT dosing and the following specific interventions were implemented during the course of 1 year: (1) modification of the electronic medical record (EMR) to include calculated average 24-hour dose in real time, (2) modification of the CRRT procedure note to include comments on dosing, (3) modification of the CRRT order set to display calculations, and (4) yearly educational sessions for renal fellows outlining CRRT-specific dosing targets. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was weekly percentage of CRRT treatments with an average delivered daily dose of 20 to 25mL/kg/h. Process and balancing outcomes included CRRT flowsheet accuracy, documentation of rates of delivered dose, and nursing satisfaction. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Rates of weekly CRRT dosing in compliance with national guidelines were determined and used to create run charts showing compliance rates before and after the quality improvement interventions. RESULTS: Among 837 treatments before the intervention, 279 (33%) daily CRRT sessions achieved an average dose of 20 to 25mL/kg/h. Following implementation of interventions, 631 of 952 (66%) treatments achieved this goal. Week-to-week variation in dosing was significantly reduced. LIMITATIONS: A single-center study generating data that may not be generalizable to institutions with different CRRT nursing models or different EMR systems. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to the EMR and documentation templates and education of CRRT providers about dosing were associated with doubling of the rate of appropriate CRRT dosing and reduction in dosing variability.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy/methods , Dialysis Solutions/administration & dosage , Quality Improvement , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Colorado , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy/mortality , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, University , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment
6.
J Grad Med Educ ; 10(5): 573-582, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30386485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While leadership training is increasingly incorporated into residency education, existing assessment tools to provide feedback on leadership skills are only applicable in limited contexts. OBJECTIVE: We developed an instrument, the Leadership Observation and Feedback Tool (LOFT), for assessing clinical leadership. METHODS: We used an iterative process to develop the tool, beginning with adapting the Leadership Practices Inventory to create an open-ended survey for identification of clinical leadership behaviors. We presented these to leadership experts who defined essential behaviors through a modified Delphi approach. In May 2014 we tested the resulting 29-item tool among residents in the internal medicine and pediatrics departments at 2 academic medical centers. We analyzed instrument performance using Cronbach's alpha, interrater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and item performance using linear-by-linear test comparisons of responses by postgraduate year, site, and specialty. RESULTS: A total of 377 (of 526, 72%) team members completed the LOFT for 95 (of 519, 18%) residents. Overall ratings were high-only 14% scored at the novice level. Cronbach's alpha was 0.79, and the ICC ranged from 0.20 to 0.79. Linear-by-linear test comparisons revealed significant differences between postgraduate year groups for some items, but no significant differences by site or specialty. Acceptability and usefulness ratings by respondents were high. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a rigorous approach to instrument design, we were unable to collect convincing validity evidence for our instrument. The tool may still have some usefulness for providing formative feedback to residents on their clinical leadership skills.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Educational Measurement/methods , Internship and Residency/methods , Leadership , Academic Medical Centers , California , Colorado , Feedback , Humans , Internal Medicine/education , Pediatrics/education , Reproducibility of Results
7.
J Hosp Med ; 12(3): 173-176, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28272594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital medicine (HM) is rapidly evolving into new clinical and nonclinical roles. Traditional internal medicine (IM) residency training likely does not optimally prepare residents for success in HM. Hospital medicine residency training tracks may offer a preferred method for specialized HM education. METHODS: Internet searches and professional networks were used to identify HM training tracks. Information was gathered from program websites and discussions with track directors. RESULTS: The 11 HM tracks at academic medical centers across the United States focus mostly on senior residents. Track structure and curricular content are determined largely by the structure and curricula of the IM residency programs in which they exist. Almost all tracks feature experiential quality improvement projects. Content on healthcare economics and value is common, and numerous track leaders report this content is expanding from HM tracks into entire residency programs. Tracks also provide opportunities for scholarship and professional development, such as workshops on abstract creation and job procurement skills. Almost all tracks include HM preceptorships as well as rotations within various disciplines of HM. CONCLUSIONS: HM residency training tracks focus largely on quality improvement, health care economics, and professional development. The structures and curricula of these tracks are tightly linked to opportunities within IM residency programs. As HM continues to evolve, these tracks likely will expand to bridge clinical and extra-clinical gaps between traditional IM training and contemporary HM practice. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:173-176.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/methods , Career Mobility , Hospital Medicine/education , Hospital Medicine/methods , Internship and Residency/methods , Academic Medical Centers/trends , Hospital Medicine/trends , Humans , Internship and Residency/trends
9.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 26(6): 433-435, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27653833

Subject(s)
Morbidity , Teaching Rounds
10.
Acad Med ; 91(9): 1239-43, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26983075

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: The morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference is a vital event that can affect medical education, quality improvement, and peer review in academic departments. Historically, M&M conferences have emphasized cases that highlight diagnostic uncertainty or complex management conundrums. In this report, the authors describe the development, pilot, and refinement of a systems-based M&M conference model that combines the educational and clinical missions of improving quality and patient safety in the University of Colorado Department of Medicine. APPROACH: In 2011, a focused taskforce completed a literature review that informed the development of a framework for the redesigned systems-based M&M conference. The new model included a restructured monthly conference, longitudinal curriculum for residents, and formal channels for interaction with clinical effectiveness departments. Each conference features an in-depth discussion of an adverse event using specific quality improvement tools. Areas for improvement and suggested action items are identified during the conference and delegated to the relevant clinical departments. OUTCOMES: The new process has enabled the review of 27 adverse events over two years. Sixty-three action items were identified, and 33 were pursued. An average of 50 to 60 individuals participate in each conference, including interprofessional and interdisciplinary colleagues. Resident and faculty feedback regarding the new format has been positive, and other departments are starting to adopt this model. NEXT STEPS: A more robust process for identifying and selecting cases to discuss is needed, as is a stable, sufficient mechanism to manage the improvement initiatives that come out of each conference.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Adult , Clinical Competence , Colorado , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Mortality , Safety Management/methods
11.
Acad Med ; 91(10): 1406-1415, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26983076

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although residents trust interns to provide patient care, little is known about how trust forms. METHOD: Using a multi-institutional mixed-methods study design, the authors interviewed (March-September 2014) internal medicine (IM) residents in their second or third postgraduate year at a single institution to address how they develop trust in interns. Transcript analysis using grounded theory yielded a model for resident trust. Authors tested (January-March 2015) the model with residents from five IM programs using a two-section quantitative survey (38 items; 31 rated 0 = not at all to 100 = very much; 7 rated 0 = strongly disagree to 100 = strongly agree) to identify influences on how residents form trust. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of 29 interviews yielded 14 themes within five previously identified factors of trust (resident, intern, relationship, task, and context). Of 478 residents, 376 (78.7%) completed the survey. Factor analysis yielded 11 factors that influence trust. Respondents rated interns' characteristics (reliability, competence, and propensity to make errors) highest when indicating importance to trust (respective means 86.3 [standard deviation = 9.7], 76.4 [12.9], and 75.8 [20.0]). They also rated contextual factors highly as influencing trust (access to an electronic medical record, duty hours, and patient characteristics; respective means 79.8 [15.3], 73.1 [14.4], and 71.9 [20.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Residents form trust based on primarily intern- and context-specific factors. Residents appear to consider trust in a way that prioritizes interns' execution of essential patient care tasks safely within the complexities and constraints of the hospital environment.

12.
Am J Med Qual ; 31(4): 293-300, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25855673

ABSTRACT

Dramatic changes in health care require physician leadership. Efforts to instill necessary skills often occur late in training. The Heath Innovations Scholars Program (HISP) provided preclinical medical students with experiential learning focused on process improvement. Students led initiatives to improve the discharge process for stroke patients. All students completed an aptitude survey and Quality Improvement Knowledge Assessment Test (QIKAT) before and after the program. Significant improvements occurred across subject areas of leadership (18.4%, P < .001), quality and safety (14.7%, P < .001), and health care systems operations (21.2%, P < .008), and in the domains of knowledge (25.9%, P < .001) and skills (25.2%, P < .001). Average cumulative QIKAT results improved significantly (8.33 to 9.83, P = .04). Three of 4 recommended interventions were implemented. Furthermore, students engaged in other process improvement work on return to their home institutions. The HISP successfully advanced preclinical medical students' ability to lead clinical systems improvement.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical , Models, Educational , Quality Improvement , Curriculum , Education, Medical/methods , Humans , Leadership , Organizational Innovation , Patient Discharge , Stroke/therapy
14.
J Gen Intern Med ; 28(7): 908-13, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23423452

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The physician-patient relationship is at the heart of patient care. Dr. Michael Kahn proposed a checklist of six behaviors, defining "etiquette-based medicine", as a strategy to start each encounter respectfully and improve patient-physician rapport. OBJECTIVE: To assess performance of "etiquette-based medicine" in the inpatient setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional observational study using time-motion techniques between May and July, 2009. Eight hospitalists were randomly selected at each of three hospitals in the Greater Baltimore area. Each time the physician entered a patient's room, a single observer recorded whether the "etiquette-based medicine" behaviors were performed: (1) knocking or asking to enter the patient's room, (2) introducing oneself, (3) shaking the patient's hand, (4) sitting down in the patient's room, (5) explaining one's role in the patient's care, and (6) asking about the patient's feelings regarding his or her hospitalization or illness. MEASUREMENTS: The frequency with which physicians performed the six behaviors, predictors of behavior performance, and Press-Ganey performance scores. The etiquette-based medicine (EtBM) score was defined and calculated by dividing the number of observed behaviors by the number expected. RESULTS: The 24 observed hospitalists collectively saw 226 unique patients. No individual behavior was performed with a majority of patients, and, with 30 % of the patients, none of the behaviors were performed. The average EtBM score for the physicians was 22.3 % (SD 10.9 %). Physicians who spent more time with patients were more likely to perform behaviors. Sitting down (p=0.026) and EtBM scores (p=0.019) were associated with physician-specific Press-Ganey ratings. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design does not allow for determination of causality. CONCLUSIONS: "Etiquette-based medicine" was infrequently practiced by this sample of hospitalist physicians. Improving performance of etiquette-based medicine may improve patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cooperative Behavior , Hospitalists/psychology , Inpatients/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Physician-Patient Relations , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalists/standards , Humans , Male
15.
J Emerg Med ; 32(4): 409-14, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17499696

ABSTRACT

This prospective, blinded, observational, efficacy study is one of the first to evaluate ultrasound in detecting esophageal intubation, a significant source of morbidity and mortality. We utilized a convenience sample of patients undergoing elective surgery during July 2004 in an urban teaching hospital. Trained Emergency Physician sonographers performed transtracheal ultrasounds of intubations to identify esophageal intubation. In 35 of the 40 patients enrolled, there was intubation of the trachea, whereas esophageal intubation occurred in five patients. Sonographers correctly identified all five esophageal intubations, for a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-100). Ultrasound correctly identified 34 of 35 tracheal intubations and misidentified one resulting in a specificity of 97% (95% CI 90-100). It seems that transtracheal ultrasound may be an efficacious adjunct for detecting esophageal intubation.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Larynx/diagnostic imaging , Trachea/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital , Esophagus , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Inservice Training , Internship and Residency , Intubation, Gastrointestinal , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Operating Rooms , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Blind Method , Ultrasonography
16.
J Org Chem ; 64(18): 6547-6553, 1999 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11674656

ABSTRACT

The investigation of the occurrence of the alpha-effect in group transfers from phenyldialkyl sulfonium ions where one alkyl group is benzyl allows an assay of the effect of changing the nature of the C atom being transferred. The size of the alpha-effect responds to increasing electron demand, as methyl transfers do. Quantitative relationships between the size of the alpha-effect are established from both the nucleophilic side and the leaving group side of the S(N)2 transition state.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...