Management and outcomes of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a systematic review of the literature.

Background: Contemporary management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is still controversial. This systematic review of the literature aims to explore outcomes in the patients treated with conservative management vs. invasive strategy. Methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed when we extensively searched three electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science, for studies that compared conservative vs. invasive revascularization treatment outcomes for patients with SCAD from 2003 to 2023. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure (HF), need for additional revascularization, target vessel revascularization (TVR), SCAD recurrence, and stroke. Results: The systematic review included 13 observational studies evaluating 1,801 patients with SCAD. The overall mean age was 49.12 +/- 3.41, and 88% were females. The overall prevalence of arterial hypertension was 33.2%, hyperlipidemia, 26.9%, smoking, 17.8%, and diabetes, 3.9%. Approximately 48.5% of the patients were diagnosed with non-ST elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 36.8% with ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), 3.41% with unstable angina, 0.56% with stable angina, and 0.11% were diagnosed with various types of arrhythmias. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) was the most common culprit lesion in 51% of the patients. There were initially 65.2% of conservatively treated patients vs. 33.4% that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or 1.28% that underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). SCAD-PCI revascularization was associated with a variable range of PCI failure. The most common complications were hematoma extension and iatrogenic dissection. SCAD-PCI revascularization frequently required three or more stents and had residual areas of dissection. The overall reported in-hospital and follow-up mortality rates were 1.2% and 1.3%, respectively. The follow-up range across studies was 7.3-75.6 months. The authors reported variable prevalence of MACE, recurrent SCAD up to 31%, ACS up to 27.4%, TVR up to 30%, repeat revascularization up to 14.7%, UA up to 13.3%, HF up to 17.4%, and stroke up to 3%. Conclusion: Our results highlight that conservative treatment should be the preferred method of treatment in patients with SCAD. PCI revascularization is associated with a high prevalence of periprocedural complications. SCAD poses a considerable risk of MACE, mainly associated with TVR, ACS, and recurrent SCAD.

Prediction parameters of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction improvement in patients after acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CCR) in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) resolved by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and to extract the parameters that have the greatest influence on LVDD improvement. METHODS: The study included 85 subjects who were divided into intervention (N = 56) and control (N = 29) groups depending on CCR attendance. Initially and after 12 weeks, patients of both groups were subjected to echocardiography to assess LVDD, as well as CPET to assess improvement in functional capacity. RESULTS: The study showed that 23 patients (27.1%) of both groups demonstrated the improvement of LVDD degree. The improvement of the LVDD degree in the intervention group was significant, whereas in the control group, it did not change (a one-degree improvement in 22 (39.3%) patients of the intervention group (p < 0.001) and only 1 (3.4%) (p > 0.05) in the control group). Multivariate binary logistic regression showed that key parameters in LVDD improvement were participation in the CCR, E/A ratio and haemoglobin value. We created a model, for prediction of LVDF improvement, with a cut-off value of 33 (area = 0.9, p < 0.0005), a sensitivity of 87.0% and a specificity of 85.5%. CONCLUSIONS: CCR can be used as an effective non-pharmacological measure to improve LVDD and functional capacity in patients after ACS. The statistical model may have practical application in prediction of clinical benefit in such a group of patients.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Emergency Department Visits.

In 2020, decreased emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization rates during the COVID-19 outbreak were reported. There is no data about cardiovascular emergencies and mortality for the whole COVID-19 year.This study aimed to compare the rates of cardiology ED visits, hospital admissions, and intrahospital mortality between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 years in a single high-volume center.The retrospective observational cross-sectional study analyzed data on the number of ED visits, hospital admissions by different cardiovascular diagnoses, and outcomes.A total of 11744 patients visited the cardiology ED in the pre-COVID-19 year compared with 9145 in the COVID-19 year, indicating an overall decrease of 22.1% (P = 0.02) (IR 78.76 versus 61.33; incidence rate ratios (IRR) 1.28, P = 0.00), with an observed decrease of 25.5% in the number of hospitalizations (33.1% versus 31.6%, P = 0.02). A marked decrease in hospitalizations for cardiovascular emergencies was observed for hypertensive heart disease (-72.8%, P < 0.0001), acute coronary syndrome (-17.8%, P < 0.0001), myocardial and pericardial diseases and endocarditis (-61.2%, P = 0.00), and valvular heart disease (-70.8%, P < 0.0001). In the COVID-19 year, patients had increased need for mechanical ventilatory support (7% versus 6.3%, P = 0.03) with no overall difference in intrahospital mortality (IR 2.71 versus 2.78, IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82-1.16, P = 0.39).Decreased ED visits and hospitalizations not just in outbreaks but through the whole COVID-19 year highlight the risk of continuous delay of needed care for emergency life-threatening cardiovascular diseases. Urgent comprehensive strategies that will address patient- and system-related factors to decrease morbidity and mortality and prevent collateral damage of the pandemic are needed.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and COVID-19.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with COVID-19 is triggered by various mechanisms and can significantly affect the patient's further treatment and prognosis. The study aimed to investigate the characteristics, major complications, and predictors of mortality in COVID-19 patients with ACS. All consecutive patients hospitalized from 5 July 2020 to 5 May 2021 for ACS with confirmed SARS-Co-2 were prospectively enrolled and tracked for mortality until 5 June 2021. Data from the electronic records for age and diagnosis, matched non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 ACS group, were extracted and compared. Overall, 83 COVID-19 ACS patients, when compared to 166 non-COVID ACS patients, had significantly more prevalent comorbidities, unfavorable clinical characteristics on admission (acute heart failure 21.7% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.01) and higher rates of major complications, 33.7% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.01, and intrahospital 30-day mortality, 6.7% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.01. The strongest predictors of mortality were aortic regurgitation, HR 9.98, 95% CI 1.88; 52.98, p < 0.01, serum creatinine levels, HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01; 1.04, p < 0.01, and respiratory failure therapy, HR 13.05, 95% CI 3.62; 47.01, p < 0.01. Concomitant ACS and COVID-19 is linked to underlying comorbidities, adverse presenting features, and poor outcomes. Urgent strategies are needed to improve the outcomes of these patients.

Left Atrial Strain as a Predictor of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Arterial Hypertension.

Background and Objectives: There is emerging evidence of the usefulness of left atrial strain (LAS) in the assessment of diastolic dysfunction (DD). In this study we assess the sensitivity and specificity of LAS, to determine cut-off values and their association to DD with increased left atrial pressure (LAP) in patients with well-treated arterial hypertension. Materials and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study on 180 subjects with well-treated arterial hypertension. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography. Patients were divided into two groups: a group without increased LAP and/or DD and a group with increased LAP DD. Results: In multivariate logistic regression, LAS proved to be the strongest statistically significant predictor of DD with increased LAP (OR 0.834, p < 0.0005), with AUC 0.885 and a set cut-off value of 24.27% with high sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 84.6%. The set cut-off for LAS > 24.27% was significantly highly prevalent in the group of DD with increased LAP 78.9% when compared to the group without increased LAP 15.4%, p < 0.0001. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that LAS could be a useful and highly sensitive and specific marker in the evaluation of DD. There is the potential for using LAS in everyday practice as a standard parameter in diastolic function assessment.

Case Report: Multimodality Imaging as a Lifeline for Fatal Localization of Valsalva Sinus Fibroelastoma.

Background: Papillary fibroelastomas are rare benign heart tumors, and is most likely to involve the cardiac valves. We will present an extremely rare localization of a large Valsalva sinus fibroelastoma, with occasional left coronary artery ostial obstruction presented as an acute coronary syndrome. The tumor was removed surgically and histologically confirmed as papillary fibroelastoma. This review points to the crucial importance of multidisciplinary team decision and multimodality imaging methods for diagnosing the fibroelastoma, determination of size, and localization, which avoided complications of fatal embolization during an invasive procedure. Case Summary: A healthy 55-year-old male with vigorous physical daily training and exercise was admitted to the acute coronary syndrome emergency department. Shortly after admission, expert transthoracic echocardiography was performed. Computed tomography of the chest observed a large irregular hypodense tumor-like lesion in the bulbar aorta that was occasionally prolapsing into the left main coronary artery ostium and which corresponded to fibroelastoma. A few hours after admission, an emergency cardiac surgery was performed with the excision of a Valsalva sinus tumor (size 2 × 2 cm) located between the right and left coronary cusp of the aortic valve. Conclusions: Focus cardiac ultrasound should be performed for any acute coronary syndrome because of the possible Valsalva sinus fibroelastoma etiology. Its localization next to the left main coronary artery ostium is rare, and dangerous. The timely diagnosis can be made by the multimodality imaging method, however, the final diagnosis will be made pathohistologically. Early cardiac surgery may be a necessitated recourse for these patients in order to prevent a fatal outcome.

Echocardiographic parameters as predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Different ways have been used to stratify risk in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. The aim of the study was to examine the usefulness of echocardiographic parameters as predictors of in-hospital outcome in patients with ACS after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A data of 2030 patients with diagnosis of ACS hospitalized from December 2008 to December 2011 was used to develop a risk model based on echocardiographic parameters using the binary logistic regression. This model was independently evaluated in validation cohort prospectively (954 patients admitted during 2012). In-hospital mortality in derivation cohort was 7.73%, and 6.28% in validation cohort. Developed model has been designed with 4 independent echocardiographic predictors of in-hospital mortality: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF RR = 0.892; 95%CI = 0.854-0.932, P < 0.0005), aortic leaflet separation diameter (AOvs RR = 0.131; 95%CI = 0.027-0.627, P = 0.011), right ventricle diameter (RV RR = 2.675; 95%CI = 1.109-6.448, P = 0.028) and right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP RR = 1.036; 95%CI = 1.000-1.074, P = 0.048). Model has good prognostic accuracy (AUROC = 0.84) and it retains good (AUROC = 0.78) when testing on the validation cohort. Risks for in-hospital mortality after PCI in ACS patients using echocardiographic measurements could be accurately predicted in contemporary practice. Incorporation of such developed model should facilitate research, clinical decisions, and optimizing treatment strategy in selected high risk ACS patients.