Filtered technetium-99m-sulfur colloid evaluated for lymphoscintigraphy.

UNLABELLED: Several 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals have been developed for lymphoscintigraphy of the extremities. In the United States, however, these agents are not widely used clinically. This study evaluates the use of smaller particle sizes ( < 0.1 micron) of 99mTc-sulfur colloid (99mTc-SC) for lymphoscintigraphy. METHODS: The 99mTc-SC was prepared by kit, and the final preparation was filtered through a sterile 0.1-micron filter. The radiochemical purity (RCP) of the filtered 99mTc-SC was determined before administration. Nineteen patients with suspected lymphedema were injected with 18.5 MBq (500 muCi) filtered 99mTc-SC intradermally in each foot, and whole-body images were obtained immediately and 1, 3, 6 and 24 hr later. Local views over the inguinal or axillary lymph nodes were also obtained every 5 min for the first hour. RESULTS: The average RCP value was 93.4% +/- 4.2% (n = 19), and the RCP difference pre- and postfiltration of the 99mTc-SC preparation was -1.7% +/- 1.4% (n = 40). Evaluation of the particle size with the polycarbonate filter showed that 89.9% +/- 4.5% (n = 28) of particles were less than 50 nm, and the particle size was further determined by electron microscopy to be 38.0 +/- 3.3 nm (n = 202). The mean particle sizes of two peaks measured by laser light scattering techniques were 7.5 and 53.9 nm (major peak). Clinical studies with filtered 99mTc-SC demonstrated similar lymphoscintigrams compared with those obtained with 99mTc antimony sulfide colloid (99mTc-ATC). Filtered 99mTc-SC showed a faster transport rate to the inguinal lymph nodes and lower radiation dosimetry for liver, spleen and whole body compared with 99mTc-ATC. CONCLUSION: Filtered 99mTc-SC can be easily prepared and is readily available for routine clinical use in lymphoscintigraphic studies.

Radiochemical purity testing for 99Tcm-exametazime: a comparison study for three-paper chromatography.

The standard radiochemical purity (RCP) determination uses a three-paper chromatography strip and solvent system (TP). The involvement of multiple strips for calculation of percentage primary, lipophilic 99Tcm-exametazime complex is tedious and time-consuming. The significant streaking of radioactivity on the ITLC/SG MEK strip of the TP method indicates that ITLC/SG MEK may not be an ideal system for RCP analysis of 99Tcm-exametazime. This study was undertaken to compare the standard TP method with two other proposed single-strip chromatography systems: Whatman 17 Chr paper with ethyl acetate (WE) and Gelman Solvent Saturation Pads paper with ether (GE). Our results showed that the solvent developing times (n = 55) and Rf values for TP, WE and GE were 130.4 +/- 9.0 s/0.5-1.0, 205.9 +/- 13.0 s/0.2-1.0 and 90.2 +/- 7.5 s/0.8-1.0, respectively. For RCP values ranging from 45.0 to 94.6% (n = 61), both WE and GE closely correlated with TP (r = 0.97 and 0.96). However, in the intermediate RCP range (i.e. 75-85%, n = 25), the false RCP acceptance rate (i.e. RCP > or = 80%) was 40% (10/25) for the WE method versus 4% (1/25) for the GE method. The GE method has the most clear separation of lipophilic 99Tcm-exametazime from other radiochemical impurities and offers the quickest RCP analysis for 99Tcm-exametazime with relatively accurate results.