Myocardial Recovery, Metabolism, and Structure after Cardiac Arrest with Cardioplexol.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies indicate encouraging cardioprotective potential for Cardioplexol. Its cardioprotective capacities during 45 minutes of ischemia compared with pure no-flow ischemia or during 90 minutes of ischemia compared with Calafiore cardioplegia were investigated experimentally. METHODS: Forty-four rat hearts were isolated and inserted into a blood-perfused pressure-controlled Langendorff apparatus. In a first step, cardiac arrest was induced by Cardioplexol or pure no-flow ischemia lasting 45 minutes. In a second step, cardiac arrest was induced by Cardioplexol or Calafiore cardioplegia lasting 90 minutes. For both experimental steps, cardiac function, metabolic parameters, and troponin I levels were evaluated during 90 minutes of reperfusion. At the end of reperfusion, hearts were fixed, and ultrastructural integrity was examined by electron microscopy. RESULTS: Step 1: after 90 minutes of reperfusion, hearts exposed to Cardioplexol had significantly higher left ventricular developed pressure (CP-45': 74%BL vs. no-flow-45': 45%BL; p = 0.046) and significantly better maximal left ventricular relaxation (CP-45': 84%BL vs. no-flow-45': 51%BL; p = 0.012). Oxygen consumption, lactate production, and troponin levels were similar in both groups. Step 2: left ventricular developed pressure was lower (22 vs. 48% of BL; p = 0.001) and coronary flow was lower (24 vs. 53% of BL; p = 0.002) when Cardioplexol was used compared with Calafiore cardioplegia. Troponin I levels were significantly higher under Cardioplexol (358.9 vs. 106.1 ng/mL; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Cardioplexol significantly improves functional recovery after 45 minutes of ischemia compared with pure ischemia. However, Cardioplexol protects the myocardium from ischemia/reperfusion-related damage after 90 minutes of ischemia worse than Calafiore cardioplegia.

Early-Term Results of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement versus Standard Bioprosthesis Implantation Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic stenosis is highly prevalent among patients with concomitant coronary artery disease. Surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting is usually the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis and significant coronary disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and hemodynamic results of the implantation of rapid-deployment valves (Rapid-Deployment Edwards Intuity Valve System [RDAVR]) versus conventional sutured valves (CSAVR) in combined surgery. METHODS: Between January 2012 and January 2017, 120 patients underwent replacement via RDAVR and 133 patients underwent replacement using CSAVR with concomitant coronary bypass grafting. Clinical and echocardiographic data were compared. RESULTS: The mean age was 76 ± 7 for RDAVR patients and 74 ± 6 years for CSAVR patients (p = 0.054); 48% in the RDAVR group were female versus 17% in the CSAVR group (p <0.002). Other characteristics such as diabetes mellitus, body-mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nicotine consumption, and extracardiac arteriopathy were similar. Coronary three-vessel disease was more common in the RDAVR group (42.5 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.017). Both mean EuroSCORE II (6.6 ± 5.4 vs. 4.3 ± 3.0, p = 0.001) and STS score (5.4 ± 4.4 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the RDAVR group. Mean cross-clamp time (82 ± 25 vs. 100 ± 30 minutes, p < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (119 ± 38 vs. 147 ± 53 minutes, p < 0.001) were shorter with RDAVR. The mean number of bypass grafts, length of hospital and ICU stays, and mechanical ventilation time were not statistically significant different. Hospital mortality was 2.5% for RDAVR and 9.7% for CSAVR (p = 0.019). There was a similar rate of stroke (5.8 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.990) and postoperative delirium (14.1 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.728). Mean gradients were 8.2 ± 4.1 mm Hg in the RDAVR group vs. 11.3 ± 4.6 mm Hg in the CSAVR group (p = 0.001) at discharge. CONCLUSION: RDAVR combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be performed extremely safely. Cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times can be significantly reduced with rapid deployment aortic valve system in the scenario of combined CABG. RDAVR resulted in lower gradients than CSAVR in patients implanted with prostheses of the same size.

Remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with six ischemic cycles.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP), which utilizes in part the extracellular RNA (eRNA)/RNase1 pathway, can induce ischemic tolerance in humans. Because RIP has thus far been tested only with four cycles of extremity ischemia/reperfusion, we investigated the influence of six cycles of ischemia on the eRNA/RNase1 pathway in cardiac patients. METHODS: Six cycles of RIP were carried out in 14 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Blood samples were taken at 13 timepoints during surgery and at three timepoints after surgery for determining serum levels of RNase1, eRNA, and TNF-α. Trans-cardiac gradients between the myocardial blood inflow and outflow were calculated. RESULTS: Between the fourth and the sixth RIP cycles, a noticeable increase in the levels of eRNA (fourth: 151.6 (SD: 44.2) ng/ml vs sixth: 181.8 (SD: 87.5) ng/ml, p = .071), and a significant increase in RNase1 (fourth: 151.1 (SD: 42.6) U/ml vs sixth: 175.3 (SD: 41.2) U/ml, p = .001), were noted. The trans-cardiac gradients of RNase1 and eRNA before and after ischemia were not significantly different (p = .158 and p = .221; p = .397 and p = .683, respectively). Likewise, the trans-cardiac gradient of TNF-α was similar before and after ischemia. During the first 48 h after the surgery, RNase1 activity rose significantly and exceeded baseline values (135.7 (SD: 40.6) U/ml before and 279.2 (SD: 85.6) U/ml after surgery, p = .001) as did eRNA levels (148,6 (SD: 35.4) ng/ml before and 396.5 (SD: 154.5) ng/ml after surgery, p = .005), whereas TNF-α levels decreased significantly (91.7 (SD: 47.7) pg/ml before and 35.7 (SD: 36.9) pg/ml after surgery, p = .001). CONCLUSION: Six RIP cycles increased the RNase1 levels significantly above those observed with four cycles. More clinical data are required to show whether this translates into a benefit for patients.

Oral application of levosimendan before ischaemia/reperfusion with or without cardioplegic arrest in rats.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies have indicated minor beneficial effects of the calcium sensitizer levosimendan on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Here, the influence of levosimendan administered 24 h before cardiac arrest on myocardial function was examined in rat hearts perfused in a Langendorff model. METHODS: Levosimendan (Levo group) or NaCl (control group) was administered to 53 rats via drinking water 24 h prior to mounting excised hearts on a Langendorff apparatus. Cardiac arrest with or without cardioplegia was induced in both groups; another set of hearts was perfused continuously. During 90-min reperfusion at 36°C, functional parameters were measured and normalized to baseline values. Troponin I was quantified in coronary sinus effluent, and the functionality of isolated cardiomyocytes was studied. RESULTS: Oral application of levosimendan showed therapeutic efficacy. Baseline values were similar in the Levo and NaCl groups except for coronary flow. After ischaemia and reperfusion, Levo hearts did not recover better than NaCl hearts {left ventricular derived pressure: 63 [standard deviation (SD): 36.2] vs 46 (SD: 41.8)% baseline; P = 0.386}, In hearts exposed to cardioplegia, functional recovery only slightly differed in the Levo and NaCl groups [left ventricular derived pressure: 69.96 (SD: 12.7) vs 51.89 (SD: 28.1)% baseline; P = 0.09]. Cell shortening of cardiomyocytes isolated from hearts exposed to ischaemia or perfusion was better in Levo groups [cell shortening: 7.65 (SD: 1.95) %; 7.8 (SD: 1.79)% vs 6.28 (SD: 1.67)%; 6.5 (SD: 1.87)%, P < 0.001]; this benefit was absent in cardioplegia-treated hearts. CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan applied orally before ischaemia/reperfusion improves functional recovery, but this effect is only moderate when cardioplegia is included. Differences between hearts exposed to cardioplegia or to global ischaemia may indicate why levosimendan-related beneficial effects do not directly translate into better clinical outcome.

Intermediate Outcomes after Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement in Multiple Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Multiple valve surgery is associated with significant higher operative risks. Reduced cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times in multiple valve surgery may potentially be beneficial as they can be considered independent risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery. We report first intermediate outcomes of the Edwards Intuity valve system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, United States) in combined procedures METHODS: Fifty-eight patients underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with concomitant mitral valve surgery between January 2014 and November 2017 in our institution. The valve was assessed echocardiographically after 12 months. The median follow-up was 1.7 years with a cumulative follow-up time of 115.3 patient years. RESULTS: The mean age was 73.5 ± 6.2 years and the mean logistic Euroscore was 11.6 ± 3.1%. Concomitant mitral valve repair was performed in 43 cases (74.1%), and mitral valve replacement in 15 cases (19.0%). The mean cross-clamp time was 93 ± 21 minutes along with a mean bypass time of 118 ± 24 minutes. All-cause mortality after 30 days was 8.6%. Overall actuarial survival at 1 year was 87.2 ± 4.5% and after 2 years 82.8 ± 5.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in multiple valve surgery can be performed safely with good intermediate outcomes in elderly, high-risk patients.

Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Scanning for the Diagnosis of a Mediastinal Tumor.

Thymomas are rare tumors that commonly lie in the anterior mediastinum. The arteries supplying thymomas branch from the internal thoracic arteries and their collaterals. This report presents a patient with huge mediastinal thymoma, whose sensational vascularization is ensured directly by a single dominant tributary branch of the left internal thoracic artery. After initially performed computed tomography angiography, the tumor was suspect to be vascularized from the right coronary artery. Triple-rule-out computed tomography scan was a key step for accurate radiologic diagnosis.

Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in a minimal access setting: intermediate clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter procedures have overtaken conventional operations in Germany. Considering that this is a highly competitive field, a rate of 25% for minimal access aortic valve replacement seems to be disappointingly low. One way to promote minimal access techniques is through the systematic use of rapid deployment valves. METHODS: A total of 143 patients underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via upper right hemisternotomy between March 2012 and September 2015. All patients were followed up annually. Echocardiographic assessment of the valve was performed after 12 months. The cumulative follow-up time was 275.2 patient-years. The median follow-up time was 1.9 years. RESULTS: The mean age was 76.4 ± 6.2 years, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 11.0 ± 4.3%. Early all-cause mortality was 2.8% (n = 4). Actuarial survival after 1 year was 91.6 ± 2.4%, and after 3 years, it was 84.4 ± 3.6%. Mean transprosthetic gradient after 12 months was 10.3 ± 3.8 mmHg. New onset of higher grade paravalvular leakage did not occur during the follow-up period. Perioperatively, higher grade paravalvular leakage (aortic insufficiency >1+) occurred in 2 cases (1.4%) . CONCLUSIONS: Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement can be performed safely in a minimal access setting with low complication rates and good haemodynamic results. Therefore, rapid deployment valves are a relevant option in minimal access surgery.

The Use of Rapid Deployment Valves in Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgery: One-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing multiple valve surgery represent a high-risk group who could potentially benefit from a reduction of cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times because prolonged bypass and cross-clamp times are considered independent risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between July 2013 and November 2014, 16 patients underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system in the setting of concomitant mitral disease. Fifteen patients showed mitral regurgitation, whereas one patient had severe mitral stenosis. Fourteen patients received mitral valve repair and two patients received biological mitral valve replacement. Tricuspid valve repair was performed additionally in two patients. The mean ± SD age was 72.8 ± 8.4 years, and the mean ± SD logistic EuroSCORE II is 8.7% ± 3.4%. RESULTS: Within a 30-day perioperative period, no patient was lost (n = 0). The mean ± SD follow-up time was 11 ± 2 months. At 1 year, the overall survival was 81% (n = 13). A mean ± SD transaortic gradient of 10.7 ± 2.3 mm Hg and a mean ± SD effective orifice area of 1.7 ± 0.3 cm were measured echocardiographically. No higher-grade paravalvular leak (aortic insufficiency > 1+) occurred. Eight patients (61%) had no residual mitral regurgitation, four patients (30%) showed trivial regurgitation (1/4), and one patient (7.3%) had moderate mitral regurgitation (2/4). No interference of the subannular stent frame with the reconstructed valve or the biological mitral prosthesis was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system in combined aortic and mitral valve surgery can be performed safely with reproducible results. One-year follow-up data of this small series shows encouraging results potentially justifying the extension of the indication for rapid deployment valves to patients with concomitant mitral disease. Especially elderly patients undergoing multiple valve surgery may benefit from a reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemic times.

Aortic Valve Replacement with the Labcor TLPB Supra™ Porcine Bioprosthesis: Intermediate Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The Labcor TBLP Supra™ prosthesis is a second-generation tissue valve that has evolved from the Labcor TBLP™ prosthesis, first introduced in 1984. The Supra prosthesis is a triple-composite porcine valve, with no specific anticalcification treatment being used in its production other than standard tissue fixation with 0.4% glutaraldehyde. To date, more than 100,000 Supra valves have been implanted, mainly in South America. Despite this remarkably high number of implants, only marginal data exist concerning durability and safety issues. Hence, the study aim was to analyze short-term and intermediate outcomes relating to the clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Supra valve, as well as complication rates METHODS: A follow up study was initiated to evaluate outcomes and durability of the Labcor Supra prosthesis. Between September 2004 and October 2010, a total of 331 patients (mean age 75.8 ± 7.2 years; mean logistic EuroSCORE 8.5 ± 2.3%) underwent aortic valve replacement using the Supra porcine bioprosthesis. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (n = 16). The overall actuarial five-year survival was 72.3 ± 4.9%, and eight-year survival was 60.4 ± 5.6%. Actuarial freedom from reoperation was 96.3 ± 2.4% after five years, and 92.5 ± 3.5% after eight years. Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) was 99.7 ± 0.3% at five years, and 97.2 ± 0.8% at eight years; actuarial freedom from thromboembolism was 97.5 ± 1.0% and 95.7 ± 1.6% at these times. Actuarial freedom from event rates for endocarditis were 99.5 ± 0.3% and 96.8 ± 0.6%, and 96.1 ± 0.9% and 93.0 ± 1.4% for reoperation CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found of increased rates of SVD. All parameters studied were comparable to those examined for other second-generation porcine prostheses. Further long-term follow up investigations are required however, for the final judgment of this prosthesis.

Randomized Control of Sympathetic Drive With Continuous Intravenous Esmolol in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The BEtA-Blocker Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (BEAT-AMI) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the role of esmolol-induced tight sympathetic control in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Elevated sympathetic drive has a detrimental effect on patients with acute STEMI. The effect of beta-blocker-induced heart rate mediated sympathetic control on myocardial damage is unknown. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial involving patients with STEMI and successful percutaneous intervention (Killip class I and II). Patients were randomly allocated to heart rate control with intravenous esmolol for 24 h or placebo. The primary outcome was the maximum change in troponin T release as a prognostic surrogate marker for myocardial damage. A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between patients allocated to placebo and those who received sympathetic control with esmolol in terms of maximum change in troponin T release: the median serum troponin T concentration increased from 0.2 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 0.1 to 0.7 ng/ml) to 1.3 ng/ml (IQR: 0.6 to 4.7 ng/ml) in the esmolol group and from 0.3 ng/ml (IQR: 0.1 to 1.2 ng/ml) to 3.2 ng/ml (IQR: 1.5 to 5.3 ng/ml) in the placebo group (p = 0.010). The levels of peak creatine kinase (CK), CK subunit MB (CK-MB), and n-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were lower in the esmolol group compared with placebo (CK 619 U/l [IQR: 250-1,701 U/l] vs. 1,308 U/l [IQR: 610 to 2,324 U/l]; p = 0.013; CKMB: 73.5 U/l [IQR: 30 to 192 U/l] vs. 158.5 U/l [IQR: 74 to 281 U/l]; p = 0.005; NT-proBNP: 1,048 pg/ml (IQR: 623 to 2,062 pg/ml] vs. 1,497 pg/ml [IQR: 739 to 3,318 pg/ml]; p = 0.059). Cardiogenic shock occurred in three patients in the placebo group and in none in the esmolol group. CONCLUSIONS: Esmolol treatment statistically significantly decreased troponin T, CK, CK-MB and NT-proBNP release as surrogate markers for myocardial injury in patients with STEMI. (Heart Rate Control After Acute Myocardial Infarction; DRKS00000766).