Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 201(6): 797-804, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20832053

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of conservative and radical treatment of liver hydatid disease. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent surgery for liver hydatid disease between 1980 and 2005 were reviewed. Outcomes measured were operative morbidity and mortality, hospital stay, and recurrence. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients underwent conservative treatment (external drainage, marsupialization, omentoplasty), and 240 had radical surgery (hepatic resection, cystopericystectomy). Operative morbidity was 79.9% and 16.2% for conservative and radical procedures, respectively (P < .001). Operative mortality was 6.5% for conservative procedures and 9.2% for radical procedures (P = .3). The recurrence rate was 30.4% in patients having conservative surgery and 1.2% in patients undergoing radical surgery (P < .001). No recurrences occurred in patients with clear cysts after conservative surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Cystopericystectomy was a safe and effective procedure that achieved excellent immediate and long-term results. Hepatic resection should be considered only in exceptional cases, because it involves the unnecessary sacrifice of healthy hepatic parenchyma. Conservative surgery and alternative procedures should be restricted to the treatment of clear cysts and to patients who cannot undergo radical surgery.


Subject(s)
Drainage/methods , Echinococcosis, Hepatic/surgery , Hepatectomy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Drainage/mortality , Echinococcosis, Hepatic/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatectomy/mortality , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Liver Int ; 27(2): 209-14, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17311615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bronchobiliary fistula (BBF) is an uncommon but severe complication of hydatid disease of the liver. Operation is considered the treatment of choice but the most appropriate operation is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes following different surgical procedures. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 31 patients with BBF was performed. Surgical access consisted of laparotomy, thoracotomy or a thoracoabdominal (TA) incision. Surgical procedures for the treatment of the cyst were classified as conservative or radical. RESULTS: Radical treatment including lung resection and pericystectomy was performed in all patients in whom the surgical exposure was obtained by either thoracotomy or TA. Of the patients treated by laparotomy, two had a pericystectomy, and four had drainage of the cyst. There were two deaths among the seven thoracotomy patients and one among the 18 TA patients. Pleural effusion was observed in six of the TA, two of the thoracotomy, and three of the laparotomy patients. Biliary fistula occurred in two of the five thoracotomy patients surviving operation and in two laparotomy patients (2/6). Progression of the lung disease was observed in four laparotomy patients and in one thoracotomy patient. CONCLUSIONS: The better outcome achieved in TA patients is the result of the simultaneous radical treatment of all the pathological aspects of BBF.


Subject(s)
Biliary Fistula/parasitology , Bronchial Fistula/parasitology , Echinococcosis, Hepatic/complications , Echinococcosis, Hepatic/surgery , Echinococcosis, Pulmonary/complications , Echinococcosis, Pulmonary/surgery , Abdomen/surgery , Adult , Drainage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laparotomy , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Thoracotomy/mortality , Treatment Outcome
3.
Arch Surg ; 138(1): 80-5, 2003 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12511157

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: To verify the adequacy of duodenal segmentectomy after intestinal derotation in the treatment of primary adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum. DESIGN: A retrospective review of the surgical management of patients who underwent derotation of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum was undertaken to determine long-term outcome. SETTING: Departments of surgery in 3 university hospitals. PATIENTS: Between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2000, 47 patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum were surgically treated at 3 different institutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Details of primary surgery were abstracted from clinical records of the original hospital referral. Postoperative clinical course and long-term outcome were evaluated by a review of the hospital records and follow-up. RESULTS: The results of a barium swallow test series was positive in 38 cases (80.8%) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was primarily diagnostic in 30 patients (63.8%). In all cases duodenal segmentectomy was attempted. Twenty-two patients underwent palliative gastrojejunal bypass and in 9 patients pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. In 16 cases duodenal segmentectomy was performed after intestinal derotation. Anastomoses were performed manually in all cases. Fifteen of the resected patients died of recurrent disease. A median (SD) disease-free survival of 36 (23.6) months (range, 6-85 months) was observed. The median (SD) overall survival was 37.5 (23.9) months (range, 11-85 months), the overall 5-year survival rate was 23% (11 patients), and the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 51% (24 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Duodenal segmentectomy associated with intestinal derotation was shown to be a straightforward, safe procedure for the treatment of the primary adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum. This surgical procedure should be preferred to pancreaticoduodenectomy because it is associated with negligible rates of morbidity and mortality, while allowing for satisfactory margin clearance and adequate lymphadenectomy.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...