A Non-Randomized Pilot Study on the Benefits of Baby Swimming on Motor Development.

According to the concept of "embodied cognition", motor development should not be considered distant from cognitive and language processes. Motor development is essential in the first 1000 days of life, as the child explores and learns new information from the environment. Among motor activities, baby swimming allows infants to make movements that they are not able to perform on solid ground. Since movements become slower in water, the sensory perception of these movements is amplified. However, the relationship between early swimming experience and motor development has not yet been investigated. Therefore, we carried out a pilot study with the aim of exploring this relationship for the first time. To that end, 32 infants aged from 6 to 10 months were recruited. The Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 was used to assess motor abilities in healthy children who regularly carried out aquatic courses compared to children who never attended swimming practice. Independent-sample t-tests showed significant differences in favor of the group that performed infant swimming activities on measures of reflexes (t = −2.2, p < 0.05), grasping (t = −3.8, p < 0.001), fine-motor quotient (t = −3.4, p < 0.01) and total-motor quotient (t = −2.4, p < 0.05). Overall, in line with the embodied cognition perspective, these preliminary results are encouraging and allow us to investigate how motor development influences later language development.

Changes in the perceived epidemiology of primary hyperaldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism has been considered a rare disease in the past years, affecting 1% of the hypertensive population. Subsequently, growing evidence of its higher prevalence is present in literature, although the estimates of disease range from 5 up to 20%, as in type 2 diabetes and resistant hypertension. The main reasons for these variations are associated with the selection of patients and diagnostic procedures. If we consider that hypertension is present in about 20% of the adult population, primary aldosteronism can no longer be considered a rare disease. Patients with primary aldosteronism have a high incidence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and kidney complications. The identification of these patients has therefore a practical value on therapy, and to control morbidities derived from vascular damage. The ability to identify the prevalence of a disease depends on the number of subjects studied and the methods of investigation. Epidemiological studies are affected by these two problems: there is not consensus on patients who need to be investigated, although testing is recommended in subjects with resistant hypertension and diabetes. The question of how to determine aldosterone and renin levels is open, particularly if pharmacological wash-out is difficult to perform because of inadequate blood pressure control.

Blood pressure assessment in haemodialysis patients: comparison between pre-dialysis blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure measurement.

AIM: Hypertension is common in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Determining the most appropriate method of blood pressure (BP) measurement, representative of target organ damage, is still an issue. BP variations between pre- and post-HD treatment, or between on-dialysis day and off-dialysis day, are common. The aim of this study was to examine the possible differences between pre-HD office BP (OBP) levels, inter-HD (iHD) or HDday 24 h ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) with 48 h ABPM, where the latter was considered the gold standard. METHODS: 163 HD patients were studied. BP was monitored consecutively for 48 h with a Takeda TM2421 device, then sub-analysed into two periods of 24 h: HD and iHD day. An average of 12 sessions pre-HD OBP measurements was determined. RESULTS: OBP significantly overestimates systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) when compared with 48 hABPM. SBP and DBP are significantly higher on iHD day than on HD day: 141.2 1 20.8 versus 137.9 1 20.9, and 77.1 1 11.1 versus 76.1 1 10.9 (P < 0.01). No differences of SBP night/day ratio were reported between 48 hABPM and iHD 24 h ABPM or HD 24 h ABPM. The highest correlations were reported between 48 h SBP/DBP with iHD or HD 24 h ABPM (r 2 = 0.95, P < 0.001), while the lowest between 48 h SBP/DBP and OBP (r 2 = 0.40,P < 0.01, r 2 = 0.12, P < 0.01). The narrowest limits of agreement using the Bland and Altman test were reported between 48 h SBP or DBP and 24 h iHD or HD day ABPM. Considering 48 h ABPM, 80.5% of patients had BP higher than the norm, compared with 61.7% of patients in the case of OBP (c2 = 13.28, P < 0.001). The sensibility for detecting hypertension for iHD day 24 h ABPM was 98.4%, with specificity of 90%. The sensibility of 24 h HDday ABPM was 90.3%, with specificity 96.6%. In the case of OBP, sensibility and specificity were considerably lower, that is, 72.6% and 83.3% respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant differences are shown between OBP and 48 h ABPM in the recognition of a hypertensive state. OBP measurement has a lower sensibility and specificity than 24 h ABPM, which remains a valid alternative approach to 48 h ABPM in HD patients. Errors of OBP estimation should be taken into account, with possible negative impact on treatment strategies and epidemiology studies

Metabolic and endocrine effects of physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that the administration of large amounts of ghrelin to humans increases circulating concentrations of several pituitary and adrenal hormones, induces hyperglycemia and reduces serum insulin concentrations. At present, it is not known whether physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations affect glucose kinetics or hormone concentrations in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the effects of two- and three-fold increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations in eight healthy subjects during a 2 h intravenous infusion of 7.5 (GHRE7.5), 15 (GHRE15) pmol kg(-1) min(-1) acylated human ghrelin or placebo (PL), in a randomized double-blind study. Compared with PL (146 +/- 24 pM) plasma ghrelin concentrations increased at 120 min (p<0.001) about two-fold after GHRE7.5 (300 +/- 35 pM) and three-fold after GHRE15 (494 +/- 30 pM). GHRE15 significantly increased circulating concentrations of NEFA, GH, ACTH, epinephrine, and prolactin (p<0.01). GHRELIN7.5 significantly (p<0.01) increased only serum GH concentrations. Neither ghrelin infusions changed glucose flux or circulating concentrations of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, IGF-1, cortisol and norepinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: GH secretion is the only response that is stimulated by physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations; about three-fold increases in plasma ghrelin concentrations are required to elicit the responses of epinephrine, prolactin, ACTH and NEFA.

Make your diabetic patients walk: long-term impact of different amounts of physical activity on type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the impact of different amounts of increased energy expenditure on type 2 diabetes care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of long-term effects of different amounts of increased energy expenditure (metabolic equivalents [METS] per hour per week) through voluntary aerobic physical activity was performed in 179 type 2 diabetic subjects (age 62 +/- 1 years [mean +/- SE]) randomized to a physical activity counseling intervention. Subjects were followed for 2 years and divided into six groups based on their increments in METs per hour per week: group 0 (no activity, n = 28), group 1-10 (6.8 +/- 0.3, n = 27), group 11-20 (17.1 +/- 0.4, n = 31), group 21-30 (27.0 +/- 0.5, n = 27), group 31-40 (37.5 +/- 0.5, n = 32), and group >40 (58.3 +/- 1.8, n = 34). RESULTS: At baseline, the six groups did not differ for energy expenditure, age, sex, diabetes duration, and all parameters measured. After 2 years, in group 0 and in group 1-10, no parameter changed; in groups 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, and >40, HbA(1c), blood pressure, total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and estimated percent of 10-year coronary heart disease risk improved (P < 0.05). In group 21-30, 31-40, and >40, body weight, waist circumference, heart rate, fasting plasma glucose, serum LDL and HDL cholesterol also improved (P < 0.05). METs per hour per week correlated positively with changes of HDL cholesterol and negatively with those of other parameters (P < 0.001). After 2 years, per capita yearly costs of medications increased (P = 0.008) by USD393 in group 0, did not significantly change in group 1-10 (USD 206, P = 0.09), and decreased in group 11-20 (USD -196, P = 0.01), group 21-30 (USD -593, P = 0.009), group 31-40 (USD -660, P = 0.003), and group >40 (USD -579, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Energy expenditure >10 METs . h(-1) . week(-1) obtained through aerobic leisure time physical activity is sufficient to achieve health and financial advantages, but full benefits are achieved with energy expenditure >20 METs . h(-1) . week(-1).